Maddison to Man Utd? (10 Viewers)

Kilclines curly mullet · Jun 30, 2019

Maddison has made very good career moves, ensuring that he plays lots of football to continue his development.
You only have to look at George Thomas to see that going straight to the premier league from league 1 is near impossible.
I can see him going right to the very top.
Edit, George Thomas is nowhere near Maddisons ability also.

covboy1987 · Jun 30, 2019

Sell on clauses are an eye opener -and can be all different when QPR sold Raheem Sterling to Liverpool in 2010, they made sure to include a 20% sell-on clause in addition to the initial transfer fee. The forward’s subsequent £49m move from Anfield to Manchester City in 2015 gave QPR a minimum £7.8 Million windfall being the original selling club
In James Madison's case - Coventry city it was reported received 15% of the transfer fee Norwich to Leicester (20 million) so received 3 million - They will receive a minimum 10% to 15% transfer fee from Leicester to Man Utd anything from a transfer fee quoted at 70 to 100 million whatever you believe - CCFC receiving potentially 7 to 10 million - we sold him for 3 million so we might make out of the total deal up to 15 million - - Football owners are not stupid when it comes to figures and it for certain it will be 10% or even the original 15% - there also will be probably add ons for full England caps etc - dod not know whey people quote such low figures

mrtrench said:
How do you know the terms of the sell on clause? What if it's 10% of first sale profit and 5% of next sale, forcing Norwich to ask for 15% knowing we get 5%? It'll be what's in the contract, and we don't know that.

Sell on clauses are an eye opener -and can be all different when QPR sold Raheem Sterling to Liverpool in 2010, they made sure to include a 20% sell-on clause in addition to the initial transfer fee. The forward’s subsequent £49m move from Anfield to Manchester City in 2015 gave QPR a minimum £7.8 Million windfall being the original selling club
In James Madison's case - Coventry city it was reported received 15% of the transfer fee Norwich to Leicester (20 million) so received 3 million - They will receive a minimum 10% to 15% transfer fee from Leicester to Man Utd anything from a transfer fee quoted at 70 to 100 million whatever you believe - CCFC receiving potentially 7 to 10 million - we sold him for 3 million so we might make out of the total deal up to 15 million - - Football owners are not stupid when it comes to figures and it for certain it will be 10% or even the original 15% - there also will be probably add ons for full England caps etc - dod not know whey people quote such low figures

clint van damme · Jun 30, 2019

Kilclines curly mullet said:
Maddison has made very good career moves, ensuring that he plays lots of football to continue his development.
You only have to look at George Thomas to see that going straight to the premier league from league 1 is near impossible.
I can see him going right to the very top.
Edit, George Thomas is nowhere near Maddisons ability also.

Spot on, I think his advisors chose Norwich.
I've said repeatedly what you have above, his career has been brilliantly managed by those around him.

vow · Jun 30, 2019

covboy1987 said:
Sell on clauses are an eye opener -and can be all different when QPR sold Raheem Sterling to Liverpool in 2010, they made sure to include a 20% sell-on clause in addition to the initial transfer fee. The forward’s subsequent £49m move from Anfield to Manchester City in 2015 gave QPR a minimum £7.8 Million windfall being the original selling club
In James Madison's case - Coventry city it was reported received 15% of the transfer fee Norwich to Leicester (20 million) so received 3 million - They will receive a minimum 10% to 15% transfer fee from Leicester to Man Utd anything from a transfer fee quoted at 70 to 100 million whatever you believe - CCFC receiving potentially 7 to 10 million - we sold him for 3 million so we might make out of the total deal up to 15 million - - Football owners are not stupid when it comes to figures and it for certain it will be 10% or even the original 15% - there also will be probably add ons for full England caps etc - dod not know whey people quote such low figures

Sell on clauses are an eye opener -and can be all different when QPR sold Raheem Sterling to Liverpool in 2010, they made sure to include a 20% sell-on clause in addition to the initial transfer fee. The forward’s subsequent £49m move from Anfield to Manchester City in 2015 gave QPR a minimum £7.8 Million windfall being the original selling club
In James Madison's case - Coventry city it was reported received 15% of the transfer fee Norwich to Leicester (20 million) so received 3 million - They will receive a minimum 10% to 15% transfer fee from Leicester to Man Utd anything from a transfer fee quoted at 70 to 100 million whatever you believe - CCFC receiving potentially 7 to 10 million - we sold him for 3 million so we might make out of the total deal up to 15 million - - Football owners are not stupid when it comes to figures and it for certain it will be 10% or even the original 15% - there also will be probably add ons for full England caps etc - dod not know whey people quote such low figures

So, that's £30M in total, double ~~post~~ bonus!

SkyblueBazza · Jul 1, 2019

scottccfc said:
They call it a solidarity payment and its only 1 or 2% of the whole transfer fee

Every penny counts for us though, so let's embrace it

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

robbiekeane · Jul 1, 2019

covboy1987 said:
Sell on clauses are an eye opener -and can be all different when QPR sold Raheem Sterling to Liverpool in 2010, they made sure to include a 20% sell-on clause in addition to the initial transfer fee. The forward’s subsequent £49m move from Anfield to Manchester City in 2015 gave QPR a minimum £7.8 Million windfall being the original selling club
In James Madison's case - Coventry city it was reported received 15% of the transfer fee Norwich to Leicester (20 million) so received 3 million - They will receive a minimum 10% to 15% transfer fee from Leicester to Man Utd anything from a transfer fee quoted at 70 to 100 million whatever you believe - CCFC receiving potentially 7 to 10 million - we sold him for 3 million so we might make out of the total deal up to 15 million - - Football owners are not stupid when it comes to figures and it for certain it will be 10% or even the original 15% - there also will be probably add ons for full England caps etc - dod not know whey people quote such low figures

Sell on clauses are an eye opener -and can be all different when QPR sold Raheem Sterling to Liverpool in 2010, they made sure to include a 20% sell-on clause in addition to the initial transfer fee. The forward’s subsequent £49m move from Anfield to Manchester City in 2015 gave QPR a minimum £7.8 Million windfall being the original selling club
In James Madison's case - Coventry city it was reported received 15% of the transfer fee Norwich to Leicester (20 million) so received 3 million - They will receive a minimum 10% to 15% transfer fee from Leicester to Man Utd anything from a transfer fee quoted at 70 to 100 million whatever you believe - CCFC receiving potentially 7 to 10 million - we sold him for 3 million so we might make out of the total deal up to 15 million - - Football owners are not stupid when it comes to figures and it for certain it will be 10% or even the original 15% - there also will be probably add ons for full England caps etc - dod not know whey people quote such low figures

Highly doubt we would receive 10-15% of a Leicester sale of Maddison. Happy to be proven wrong but where did you get this from?

Sick Boy · Jul 1, 2019

robbiekeane said:
Highly doubt we would receive 10-15% of a Leicester sale of Maddison. Happy to be proven wrong but where did you get this from?

It’s more likely we’d get 10-15% of Norwich’s profit.

skybluegod · Jul 1, 2019

Sick Boy said:
It’s more likely we’d get 10-15% of Norwich’s profit.

Or 10-15% of the figure over 25 Mil

robbiekeane · Jul 1, 2019

skybluegod said:
Or 10-15% of the figure over 25 Mil

How would that ever work contractually? Who's going to pay us that then, Leicester? That would mean Norwich would have had to put in that clause when they sold him to Leicester...doubt it.

Sick Boy said:
It’s more likely we’d get 10-15% of Norwich’s profit.

Agree if anything it would be this. Would we have been that forward looking though? Hopefully

skybluegod · Jul 1, 2019

robbiekeane said:
How would that ever work contractually? Who's going to pay us that then, Leicester? That would mean Norwich would have had to put in that clause when they sold him to Leicester...doubt it.

Agree if anything it would be this. Would we have been that forward looking though? Hopefully

I'm not a contract lawyer? But have seen/read of some contracts which do have such clauses. I was saying it was an option, but tbh i don't really care. I seriously doubt he will move this summer.

robbiekeane · Jul 1, 2019

Just saw a reddit thread on people's experiences with him and he sounds like a right prick. Are people just naturally like this or is it the way they're brought up?

SKYBLUES90 · Jul 1, 2019

robbiekeane said:
Just saw a reddit thread on people's experiences with him and he sounds like a right prick. Are people just naturally like this or is it the way they're brought up?

This made me laugh

ccfchoi87 · Jul 1, 2019

SKYBLUES90 said:
View attachment 12514

This made me laugh

I’d love to know what people gain from making up these stories. Must have vivid imaginations.

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Jul 1, 2019

robbiekeane said:
Just saw a reddit thread on people's experiences with him and he sounds like a right prick. Are people just naturally like this or is it the way they're brought up?

I seem to remember from school that a few of those that were good at sport were full of themselves - I think a lot of the time because they were the ones constantly getting in the school paper etc and getting loads of attention, esp from the girls. I guess when you're at a point when you're just clearly so much better than others like Maddison and most of your friends are similar and it's a macho competitive environment it just exacerbates it. Similar with the girls - you tended to find the prettier ones and those that 'developed' earlier become the vacuous bimbos because they're used to attention and people getting them things without having to try.

*That's not to say all those good at sports/pretty are like this - there were plenty from the sports teams who were also great company. And the clever ones were just as bad in terms of self-confidence they were just far more discreet and didn't want attention drawn to them so they could be more devious and you'd arguably have to keep a much closer eye on them.

mrtrench · Jul 1, 2019

robbiekeane said:
How would that ever work contractually? Who's going to pay us that then, Leicester? That would mean Norwich would have had to put in that clause when they sold him to Leicester...doubt it.

Agree if anything it would be this. Would we have been that forward looking though? Hopefully

This is how I imagine it would work, if CCFC has terms in the contract for payments on future sales. I don't know if they do, so conjecture follows.

CCFC has a contract with Norwich for a cut of future sales. I would imagine the cut is on the profit of future sales (so CCFC don't get paid on the same sum twice). Let's imagine it's 10% - just because the maths is easier.

Norwich sell to Leicester for £20m. We sold for £3m so it's £17m profit and Norwich pay City £1.7m.

Leicester sell to Man U for £70m. That's £50m profit and Norwich pay City £5m (because the contract is between CCFC and NCFC). In all likelihood, Norwich added a clause into their contract with Leicester. They don't have to - but it makes sense if they know they have an ongoing liability to CCFC. Let's imagine that it's 20%. LCFC pay NCFC £10m and NCFC pay £5m to CCFC.

Danceswithhorses · Jul 1, 2019

SKYBLUES90 said:
View attachment 12514

This made me laugh

JAMIE Maddison...who is this guy ?

Terry_dactyl · Jul 1, 2019

Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I seem to remember from school that a few of those that were good at sport were full of themselves - I think a lot of the time because they were the ones constantly getting in the school paper etc and getting loads of attention, esp from the girls. I guess when you're at a point when you're just clearly so much better than others like Maddison and most of your friends are similar and it's a macho competitive environment it just exacerbates it. Similar with the girls - you tended to find the prettier ones and those that 'developed' earlier become the vacuous bimbos because they're used to attention and people getting them things without having to try.

*That's not to say all those good at sports/pretty are like this - there were plenty from the sports teams who were also great company. And the clever ones were just as bad in terms of self-confidence they were just far more discreet and didn't want attention drawn to them so they could be more devious and you'd arguably have to keep a much closer eye on them.

You had a school paper?!

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Jul 1, 2019

Terry_dactyl said:
You had a school paper?!

Kind of. It was more like one of those residents association newsletter things - about 8 pages of school 'news' and filler from students to pad it out. Always had a section on the sports with the players getting regular name checks, as well as mention in stuff like assemblies and school notices.

Covstu · Jul 1, 2019

Surely our cut was exhausted when Norwich sold him to Leicester? We wouldn’t be entitled to anything after surely?

Terry_dactyl · Jul 1, 2019

Covstu said:
Surely our cut was exhausted when Norwich sold him to Leicester? We wouldn’t be entitled to anything after surely?

The club said that the deal was such that cov would benefit for the duration of Maddison’s career...or words to that effect. Seemingly this includes percentage of future transfers, payments for international caps etc

robbiekeane · Jul 1, 2019

Class A tosser I reckon. Who rocks up to a leamington spa barbers in that...

Covstu · Jul 1, 2019

Terry_dactyl said:
The club said that the deal was such that cov would benefit for the duration of Maddison’s career...or words to that effect. Seemingly this includes percentage of future transfers, payments for international caps etc

Bloody good deal but can’t see this being a percentage as this would be out of norwich’s Control.maybe a fixed fee?

Skybluemichael · Jul 1, 2019

When you sell someone you could put whatever you like in it could ask for 50% of every sale of his career then it’s up to the buying club to add that every time he is sold again

robbiethemole · Jul 1, 2019

didn't Chris Anderson say we would be getting money from Madders, and it would put the Club right for years??

steve cooper · Jul 1, 2019

When we bought our house we were the third owners, but there was a clause in the deeds that stated if we wanted to carry out certain works to the house we had to get the original builder's permission, and pay them a fee for their approval. It was pointed out by our solicitor, that although there was no contract between us and the original builder, by signing the contract we were legally bound by the clauses in the deeds. Same thing?

Terry_dactyl · Jul 1, 2019

steve cooper said:
When we bought our house we were the third owners, but there was a clause in the deeds that stated if we wanted to carry out certain works to the house we had to get the original builder's permission, and pay them a fee for their approval. It was pointed out by our solicitor, that although there was no contract between us and the original builder, by signing the contract we were legally bound by the clauses in the deeds. Same thing?

If your house used to fall over a lot and have a stupid band round the top to stop the roof flapping about then I’d say ‘yes’.

higgs · Jul 1, 2019

robbiekeane said:
Class A tosser I reckon. Who rocks up to a leamington spa barbers in that...

Some motor

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Nick · Jul 1, 2019

robbiekeane said:
Class A tosser I reckon. Who rocks up to a leamington spa barbers in that...

I probably would to be fair

oldfiver · Jul 1, 2019

robbiekeane said:
Highly doubt we would receive 10-15% of a Leicester sale of Maddison. Happy to be proven wrong but where did you get this from?

Move the decimal point by one place to the left

shepardo01 · Jul 1, 2019

robbiekeane said:
Class A tosser I reckon. Who rocks up to a leamington spa barbers in that...

Its his car. He was going to get his hair cut. I'd go in my car too. Just so happens it is a fiesta. Should he buy a fiesta to go to the barbers? Some people have very nice cars, usually those who have a bit of cash...

Evo1883 · Jul 1, 2019

SKYBLUES90 said:
View attachment 12514

This made me laugh

Because it didn't happen?
Outrageous the things people make up for likes on social media

Gazolba · Jul 1, 2019

Houchens Head said:
Report on MSN Sports suggest he could be heading for Old Trafford. <snip>

Ready-made replacement for Pogba. Better too.

hill83 · Jul 1, 2019

SKYBLUES90 said:
View attachment 12514

This made me laugh

And then I said "Hey don't be a big smell head" then everyone in the shop clapped and carried me out chanting my name and I won the FA cup with a 40 yard screamer and won the x-factor.

steve cooper · Jul 2, 2019

hill83 said:
And then I said "Hey don't be a big smell head" then everyone in the shop clapped and carried me out chanting my name and I won the FA cup with a 40 yard screamer and won the x-factor.

I don't believe this, the x-factor isn't on at the moment

shmmeee · Jul 2, 2019

SKYBLUES90 said:
View attachment 12514

This made me laugh

That’s a well known meme. It’s not actually saying that happened

"I Saw Flying Lotus in a Grocery Store..." Copypasta | Know Your Meme

Maddison to Man Utd? (10 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Attachments

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency