What happened when Moussa no longer played?
I'm not sure. Probably.
I do see Grendel's point, he could have been restricted in this poor squad this season, and therefore not hit form.
However, a 1 in 2 ratio in the last 14 games when we had nothing to play for, and he'd been injured for 3 months, disproves Grendel's post Clarke point.
You're not that stupid so don't pretend to be.
No I'm not - it's you who lazily trotted out a stat without checking facts.
Once moussa vanished as you yourself admitted his form nosedived - one goal in 720 minutes.
Now you may argue the likes of Connor Thomas Jack finch and Adam Barton would have provided more assists than Moussa. I assume that is what you are argiung
Maybe 1 of TM demands is holding onto maddison add more quality and have a real go... Other than that carry on selling the quality bringing in shit and selling fans on a bullshit script and blaming everyone else apart from themselves, while going backwards..
Maybe SISU should offer a Sky Blue Bond?
Be able to keep Maddison, give Joy a few Bob, Bond holders get a nice bit of interest, everybody's happy.
Because they can see raw talent just as we can.
I'm not sure that even 100% interest is enough to make investing in this bond a reasonable idea. There are no assets, the club already pretty much insolvent the only reason we haven't gone bust is that the investors took seemingly worthless shares instead of insisting on their money back, bond holders wouldn't do that. I personally thought the wasps bond was too risky for only 6.5% interest but the bond you are jokingly suggesting would be an order of magnitude worse at least. No right minded investor would touch it with a bargepole.
We could brag about our wealth then.We could have a punt at promotion through the league's to the top flight with the money raised, big money then.
Surely a bond such as this would be oversubscribed?
Most seem to want us to have a go, this would be a good way to put your money where your mouth is, make it minimum £1-2000 and soon reach the target.
Every club is a selling club.
Maybe they can do a deal, you build us a ground and you have him?
We could have a punt at promotion through the league's to the top flight with the money raised, big money then.
Surely a bond such as this would be oversubscribed?
Most seem to want us to have a go, this would be a good way to put your money where your mouth is, make it minimum £1-2000 and soon reach the target.
He wasn't trying to say it was a great idea, we don't you need to explain in detail why it nobody would invest CCFC because it is obvious. As you said it was a joke, not to be taken seriously as you have with your response.I know you are trying to be funny and make a point but it's such a misinformed attempt at it.
Bond holders don't really benefit much from dramatic improvements in a companys fortunes, anyone investing in super high risk investment like you are proposing would need to be purchasing equity. No one would invest in a ccfc bond issue as things stand, it would be foolish beyond all belief, the company is worth significantly less than nothing.
Even if you were buying a share in the football club and you did believe that chucking a big chunk of money at it was a good idea you'd be an idiot to do so while the club is being run by sisu.
We could have a punt at promotion through the league's to the top flight with the money raised, big money then.
Surely a bond such as this would be oversubscribed?
Most seem to want us to have a go, this would be a good way to put your money where your mouth is, make it minimum £1-2000 and soon reach the target.
They would make more pie money at the Bull and Butcher to be honest.£1-2000 is quite a big range.
Secure it against Ryton, have part of it for refurbishing the Bull and Butcher which would then be funded by the players going in there for steak and chips every lunchtime, more profit to the club as a result... before you know it We Are Premier League.
They would make more pie money at the Bull and Butcher to be honest.
Oh and that went bust.
Partly because it kept getting machete wielding nutters bursting in to the dining area to rob the place!
Needs to put on some timber to make a mark on these leagues.
Maybe he could phone Bigi to ask for a bit of advice of going too early.
He wasn't trying to say it was a great idea, we don't you need to explain in detail why it nobody would invest CCFC because it is obvious. As you said it was a joke, not to be taken seriously as you have with your response.
Partly because it kept getting machete wielding nutters bursting in to the dining area to rob the place!
Great someone else who people can post about long after he has left
Are you just not meant to mention players once they go then? Is that how it works? Nothing existed before a minute ago, that sort of thing?
If it was a joke haha type joke I wouldn't have responded in that way, but it's a snide dig at supporters and a sisu defence all dressed up as a sarcy joke and so the response was justified. If you are going to be an ass in that way what you are saying at least has to make sense but it didn't.
Summerisles post was an ironic joke, and it was funny, and it made sense, except to the super serious like you.
I think you will find that Summerisle was one of the lone voices against the arrival of SISU whilst people like you were welcoming them as saviours on their arrival, so stressing his post as a SISU defence means really that you are the poor joker.
It depends what mention is classed as? Whether it is posting every time they have a shit or not.
Let's be honest, the huge majority of CCFC fans were welcoming them as saviours when they first arrived, probably you too.
Summerisles post was an ironic joke, and it was funny, and it made sense, except to the super serious like you.
I think you will find that Summerisle was one of the lone voices against the arrival of SISU whilst people like you were welcoming them as saviours on their arrival, so stressing his post as a SISU defence means really that you are the poor joker.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?