Maddison (1 Viewer)

[rexo87]

Starting for England for first time. Anyone know how much this earns us. Expecting billions as Anderson said it was a fantastic deal...

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

 

---

[dadgad]

Why would starting make any difference. Surely the clause would be ‘first England cap’?

 

[rexo87]

Why would starting make any difference. Surely the clause would be ‘first England cap’?

Think people ITK at the time he made an appearance said that it only came into affect when he starts

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

 

[PVA]

Well deserved and well overdue.

Hope he has a good game.

 

[robbiethemole]

He'll certainly be an upgrade on Phillips, who looked leggy and slow last game.

 

[Grendel]

He'll certainly be an upgrade on Phillips, who looked leggy and slow last game.

He’s not replacing Phillips

 

[JimmyHillsbeard]

Why would starting make any difference. Surely the clause would be ‘first England cap’?

How it was reported when he first made the squad.

Maddison cash delay and whether Sky Blues boss will see it

The Sky Blues are set to receive a six figure sum when Leicester City star James Maddison makes his first England start

www.coventrytelegraph.net

 

[Calista]

How it was reported when he first made the squad.

Maddison cash delay and whether Sky Blues boss will see it

The Sky Blues are set to receive a six figure sum when Leicester City star James Maddison makes his first England start

www.coventrytelegraph.net

In excess of £100,000 wow.
It still rankles with me that we were in such a bad state that we couldn't achieve anything like Maddison's obvious (to most) potential value, or keep him longer and build around him. At that time we had been turned into a small town club run by charlatans.

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

In excess of £100,000 wow.
It still rankles with me that we were in such a bad state that we couldn't achieve anything like Maddison's obvious (to most) potential value, or keep him longer and build around him. At that time we had been turned into a small town club run by charlatans.

2bh haven’t we received over 6m for him

 

[Calista]

2bh haven’t we received over 6m for him

Don't know about that, have reliable numbers ever been made public? Even if it's true, the money only went into keeping us afloat in the absence of meaningful investment.

 

[robbiethemole]

Playing very well and making chances, still not sure what Henderson adds to the side, always backwards and sideways

 

[SkyblueDad]

2bh haven’t we received over 6m for him

We haven’t sisu might have.

 

[Grendel]

We haven’t sisu might have.

no the club has

 

[Grendel]

Playing very well and making chances, still not sure what Henderson adds to the side, always backwards and sideways

Other than an assist for a goal? Nah your right

 

[SkyblueDad]

no the club has

I bet Joy got more than the club

 

[Grendel]

I bet Joy got more than the club

She didn’t

 

[Alan Dugdales Moustache]

He's come on leaps and bounds.
Remember how absolutely shite he was when we loaned him back from Norwich ?

 

[robbiethemole]

Arsenal fans going on about him having a moan at Saka not passing to him, saying he should wind his neck in. Wankers.

 

[SkyblueDad]

He's come on leaps and bounds.
Remember how absolutely shite he was when we loaned him back from Norwich ?

We were shite also

 

[SomersetSB]

In excess of £100,000 wow.
It still rankles with me that we were in such a bad state that we couldn't achieve anything like Maddison's obvious (to most) potential value, or keep him longer and build around him. At that time we had been turned into a small town club run by charlatans.

“How high” should our Charlatans have got for him?

 

[SkyblueDad]

Unfortunately it was a buyers market when we sold Maddison but to get what we eventually did and considering we were in division three makes it a good deal for us.

 

[Grendel]

In excess of £100,000 wow.
It still rankles with me that we were in such a bad state that we couldn't achieve anything like Maddison's obvious (to most) potential value, or keep him longer and build around him. At that time we had been turned into a small town club run by charlatans.

Without the deal we’d have struggled to exist - most of our transfer kitty in robins era has been funded by the Wilson and Maddison deals

 

[Calista]

Without the deal we’d have struggled to exist - most of our transfer kitty in robins era has been funded by the Wilson and Maddison deals

Yes, and what you are saying is not contrary to what I am saying.

 

[Calista]

“How high” should our Charlatans have got for him?

As I said, they had run us down to the point where we had to make a distressed sale on deadline day. So under those circumstances and at the time they chose to cash in, they probably got as much as they could. It doesn't make it any less annoying.

 

[SomersetSB]

As I said, they had run us down to the point where we had to make a distressed sale on deadline day. So under those circumstances and at the time they chose to cash in, they probably got as much as they could. It doesn't make it any less annoying.

I’m just a North country boy so didn’t understand them really.

 

[Calista]

I’m just a North country boy so didn’t understand

Ah I see you are pulling my plonker. Although I haven't necessarily got a plonker

 

[SomersetSB]

Ah I see you are pulling my plonker. Although I haven't necessarily got a plonker

I’m just quoting charlatan song titles no offence
One of my favourite bands.

 

[Calista]

I’m just quoting charlatan song titles no offence
One of my favourite bands.

Yeah it took me a while (the nineties were already after my time ) but then I realised you were just tellin' stories.

 

[Calista]

Daily Telegraph reporting that L****ster have put a price of £50m on Maddison. Would we get any of that?

Spurs are apparently favourites to sign him. They're years too late in making that decision IMO, when you look at some of the rubbish they've signed in the meantime.

 

[Saddlebrains]

Daily Telegraph reporting that L****ster have put a price of £50m on Maddison. Would we get any of that?

Spurs are apparently favourites to sign him. They're years too late in making that decision IMO, when you look at some of the rubbish they've signed in the meantime.

Didnt waggot say we get add ons through hos whole career?

So say he goes for 50 million, Norwich get 10 % of that then we get 10% of the 10%?

If so 500k

 

[SBT]

Daily Telegraph reporting that L****ster have put a price of £50m on Maddison. Would we get any of that?

Spurs are apparently favourites to sign him. They're years too late in making that decision IMO, when you look at some of the rubbish they've signed in the meantime.

I assume we’re entitled to a percentage of Norwich’s profits from any sales, so if Norwich profit from any deal then we do too.

 

[rob9872]

My understanding is that we have 15% of 15% above the last purchase price. Eg bought for 20m sold for 50m profit 30m. Norwich get 15% of 30m which is 4.5m, we get 15% of that which is 675k. Would pay a decent players salary for a year or 2/3 of a Martyn Wagehog

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

My understanding is that we have 15% of 15% above the last purchase price. Eg bought for 20m sold for 50m profit 30m. Norwich get 15% of 30m which is 4.5m, we get 15% of that which is 675k. Would pay a decent players salary for a year or 2/3 of a Martyn Wagehog

So this is likely to be the last pay out as he is unlikely to leave for more.

 

[Calista]

Would pay a decent players salary for a year or 2/3 of a Martyn Wagehog

The aptly named Wagehog

 

[rob9872]

So this is likely to be the last pay out as he is unlikely to leave for more.

I think so yes. Someone did say something about England caps and starting games so not sure if we got anything there or even extras for World Cup where he went but didn't play or even on appearances or titles etc almost impossible to say without seeing the actual wording, but pretty much will have come to the end of it. I think we'll have had somewhere approaching 4-5m at the end which isnt too shabby for where we were at the time.