Madine himself said they wouldnt want a fee for him
http://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/sheff-weds/sheffield-wednesday-madine-fears-for-owls-future-1-7005971
Even if they did want a fee, surely it would be small enough to pay, as after all, he is young, will score at this level and will have a value, so its not as much of a risk as some signings would be.
His scoring record is pretty dire actually
he is only 24, and has only had one real full season at our current level when he was 21. He scored 18 in 38.
Appreciate that he didn't do as well at Championship level, but my point would be, if the fee was, lets say £100k, if he has a similar run in the next season / season and a half, he would be worth more than what we pay for him, you don't agree ?
That's his one good season. Prior to that he'd scored 18 in 87 league one games.
He's not mcgoldrick .
Agreed. McGoldrick scored 21 in 131 games before joining us.
I'd be disappointed if we don't sign him. He's the type of target man we need to play off.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
In a higher division - a division which maiden managed how many? One in every 11 played?
which i acknowledged.
In my opinion, £250k for a 24 year old striker who has done well in this league wouldnt represent a gamble for SISU
Madine himself said they wouldnt want a fee for him
http://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/sheff-weds/sheffield-wednesday-madine-fears-for-owls-future-1-7005971
Even if they did want a fee, surely it would be small enough to pay, as after all, he is young, will score at this level and will have a value, so its not as much of a risk as some signings would be.
Didn't they do something similar prior to signing Clarke? Got him on loan, extended it a little to allow for further negotiations to take place?
yeah because sheff wed are not smart enough to figure that one out ......
The year before he went to Wednesday he did very well for a spell with Carlisle I recall hence why he got the move to Wednesday. Think they paid a bit of money for him. The loan extension actually might be a very shrewd move for all concerned. The only clubs which might gazump us are top League 1 clubs fighting for promotion I suspect.
I think when we want something not paying the asking price tends to go well for us.
Lets stick to that plan
What if the asking price is too high? Should we just pay it anyway?
What if they say £2m (I know they won't) but that's the asking price, should we just pay it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
How about arranging something creative like we'll pay them $1000 for every goal he scores and if we sell him at a profit, they get 25% of the fee. If we get promoted this season, we owe them an extra $100,000 (pretty safe there).
Let's face it, if he goes, we can kiss goodbye to a few hundred more supporters and may well get relegated.
What if the asking price is too high? Should we just pay it anyway?
What if they say £2m (I know they won't) but that's the asking price, should we just pay it?
He's free to talk to clubs in January anyway, Sheffield Wednesday don't want him so should be thankful to get him off their wage bill 6 months earlier, I can't see anyone in our league shelling out on him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
No we should not pay it. We should come up with a cunning plan to pay nothing as I say always works normally
Like every other club in league one with a couple of exceptions you mean?
Like every other club in league one with a couple of exceptions you mean?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?