Suffolkskyblue
Well-Known Member
Sums it up really!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The coverage makes very little difference, do prospective new owners really look at the Daily Heil for inspiration?
I've never bought the Daily Mail in my life, but I find the anti DM agenda nauseating and lazy. The ironic thing is (and I can see the reverse irony in this sentence) is that it's often from those quick to point out that people shouldn't be generalised by their demographic of race, sexual orientation, gender etc and yet are happy to brand DM readers as public enemy number one, in some kind of superiority dick waving contest that they are somehow better than them. Very odd behaviour.
That just fogs the water.I suspect this will intensify nationally as our crisis deepens I'm not sure if the lack of a home ground in one years time has struck home yet.
I've never bought the Daily Mail in my life, but I find the anti DM agenda nauseating and lazy. The ironic thing is (and I can see the reverse irony in this sentence) is that it's often from those quick to point out that people shouldn't be generalised by their demographic of race, sexual orientation, gender etc and yet are happy to brand DM readers as public enemy number one, in some kind of superiority dick waving contest that they are somehow better than them. Very odd behaviour.
I would say it drives the views, rather than represents them.Spot on! Its just the fashionable thing to do, to show how cool and PC you are. Like it or not (and I don't) the DM represents the views of a sizeable chunk of the population.
Aren't we ? In a few months time not next May we have to tell the FL where our home games are to be played if we can't do that the process of losing this Golden Share will happen and other clubs in the FL will make sure it does, you bury your head in the sand my dear but don't come crying on here should it happen.That just fogs the water.
We are not homeless in a year yet, we just don't have a deal yet.
Wasps and CCFC have yet to say we are out.
I've never bought the Daily Mail in my life, but I find the anti DM agenda nauseating and lazy. The ironic thing is (and I can see the reverse irony in this sentence) is that it's often from those quick to point out that people shouldn't be generalised by their demographic of race, sexual orientation, gender etc and yet are happy to brand DM readers as public enemy number one, in some kind of superiority dick waving contest that they are somehow better than them. Very odd behaviour.
Don't worry, it's the FL and they will be lenient. Particularly as the CCFC chairman has told them we are moving to the Butts.Aren't we ? In a few months time not next May we have to tell the FL where our home games are to be played if we can't do that the process of losing this Golden Share will happen and other clubs in the FL will make sure it does, you bury your head in the sand my dear but don't come crying on here should it happen.
I've never bought the Daily Mail in my life, but I find the anti DM agenda nauseating and lazy. The ironic thing is (and I can see the reverse irony in this sentence) is that it's often from those quick to point out that people shouldn't be generalised by their demographic of race, sexual orientation, gender etc and yet are happy to brand DM readers as public enemy number one, in some kind of superiority dick waving contest that they are somehow better than them. Very odd behaviour.
Correct tI would say it drives the views, rather than represents them.
It's a rag, and as someone else mentioned unfortunately that sizeable chunk of the population are fairly susceptible to being influenced by this comic. They create hatred and then profit off it, regardless of the impact.Spot on! Its just the fashionable thing to do, to show how cool and PC you are. Like it or not (and I don't) the DM represents the views of a sizeable chunk of the population.
As did the dear old queen mum, and other high ranking royals.You're quite wrong about me, now who is generalising.
The Daily Mail supported Oswald Mosley's blackshirts in the 1930s, that is why I call it the Daily Heil.
You're quite wrong about me, now who is generalising.
The Daily Mail supported Oswald Mosley's blackshirts in the 1930s, that is why I call it the Daily Heil.
I know it's almost like some are actually content with our situation and therefore try too shunWhat is wrong with our fans, I want every newspaper in the land to highlight our plight, every billboard to say SISU SELL NOW, we are sinking into oblivion and people get upset that a national newspaper highlights our plight. I just don't get it!
It was owned by Rothermere back then wasn't it? Whilst the Mirror has moved on to new owners the Mail is still owned by the Rothermere family.As did the Mirror so perhaps we could dub that the Daily Fuhrer
Spot on! Its just the fashionable thing to do, to show how cool and PC you are. Like it or not (and I don't) the DM represents the views of a sizeable chunk of the population.
Totally different era, Moseley was supported and financed by most of the political elite of the day, army top brass and the Royals.
It does seem to come from people "who never read it" as well, so, an informed judgement by them then
I guess we should all read the sun or mirror to get the truth about anything and everything....
Viscount Rothermere is a title, the family name is Harmsworth, but yeah they still own it.It was owned by Rothermere back then wasn't it? Whilst the Mirror has moved on to new owners the Mail is still owned by the Rothermere family.