We also have a manager that can do that but that's not true, the teams with the best players more often than not end up at the top.Often it doesn’t and the best managers get better than the sum of a team’s parts.
Yes see Man United and Chelsea.Often it doesn’t and the best managers get better than the sum of a team’s parts.
What's that supposed to mean? The team with the best players won the Prem again.Yes see Man United and Chelsea.
And the best manager.What's that supposed to mean? The team with the best players won the Prem again.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Man Utd also have a lot of experienced playersAnd the best manager.
Chelsea and Man United have two of the most expensive squads and should do far better.
I have always supported the kid and always will ( apart from them (****in corners).
Cost us nothing and has improved every season.
As we have got better, so has he.
Adi rates him one of the best midfield players in the division, that’s good enough for me.
Of course we do. I must admit I can't understand why you keep jumping on my posts and saying I am negative. I thought this was a place for discussion and I really have no problem with people disagreeing with me at all. It doesn't mean I am going to necessarily always agree with the majority on here. To be honest I find that boring and prefer people with opinions.Man Utd also have a lot of experienced players
Tbf we both want the club to do well I'm sure so no point in arguing... but it is our investments that are allowing us to move forward.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
2 of your posts and they were both negative and tbh you had the whole forum on your case with one of your posts so its not a me thing. I think you just need to enjoy it more and remember where we've come from tbh mate. These are good days.Of course we do. I must admit I can't understand why you keep jumping on my posts and saying I am negative. I thought this was a place for discussion and I really have no problem with people disagreeing with me at all. It doesn't mean I am going to necessarily always agree with the majority on here. To be honest I find that boring and prefer people with opinions.
They only thing I don't like is people hating on our players and posting derogatory comments about them. I don’t think you do this by the way.
I don’t want to bore the rest of the forum by continuing this.2 of your posts and they were both negative and tbh you had the whole forum on your case with one of your posts so its not a me thing. I think you just need to enjoy it more and remember where we've come from tbh mate. These are good days.
I'm not having a go you, it would be way more obvious if I was.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
I don’t want to bore the rest of the forum by continuing this.
Wage bills have to be within the rules. It remains to be seen if this is the case . Although I'm pretty sure that judgements re the serial offenders will be manipulated in some wayWasn’t there something a while ago that showed that wage bill was by far the biggest indicator of league position? Which kinda backs up Toms point.
How many assists did Sheaf get this season?
I tend to agree on the points regarding Sheaf, as such; very good player, however he has those immense drops in form, gets injured a lot and really doesn’t seem to shine unless he wants to. Just my opinion.Crickets. What a surprise.
Another arrogant poster that has next to no value where it matters.
If it’s signed sealed and delivered he won’t careKnowing that Robins likes to keep his deals quiet and close to his chest, if this one is a goer I’ll bet he’s furious with all the publicity
But if you break that down it just doesn’t make sense. Case for Browne. Proven, no risk, no fee, just wages. Case for Stamenic. Not proven, therefore a risk, 4m fee and wages.I think it’s working though, the club’s in the best state it’s been for decades and the punts from European leagues have worked so far. I’d rather risk it and go for Stamenic than Browne.
Maybe we need one more than one midfielder ??But if you break that down it just doesn’t make sense. Case for Browne. Proven, no risk, no fee, just wages. Case for Stamenic. Not proven, therefore a risk, 4m fee and wages.
Let's go back to the days where all our signings were free. That was a real hoot.But if you break that down it just doesn’t make sense. Case for Browne. Proven, no risk, no fee, just wages. Case for Stamenic. Not proven, therefore a risk, 4m fee and wages.
If we're changing to a flatter 3 we could definitely be after both.Maybe we need one more than one midfielder ??
Kelly has gone
Howleys progress has slowed
Sheaf is rumoured to be a target
Maybe Allen wants a move to play more
Hopefully not, but I do have a feeling it may be. He seems too much of a prospect, and our interest is bound to have alerted other clubs.#Hijacked!!
I think it makes perfect sense? Literally said I’d rather go for the risk in Stamenic than go for the 29 year old Browne that’s going to offer little resale value in 3-4 years time.But if you break that down it just doesn’t make sense. Case for Browne. Proven, no risk, no fee, just wages. Case for Stamenic. Not proven, therefore a risk, 4m fee and wages.
Maybe we need one more than one midfielder ??
Kelly has gone
Howleys progress has slowed
Sheaf is rumoured to be a target
Maybe Allen wants a move to play more
BothI think it makes perfect sense? Literally said I’d rather go for the risk in Stamenic than go for the 29 year old Browne that’s going to offer little resale value in 3-4 years time.
Let's go back to the days where all our signings were free. That was a real hoot.
I think Browne would be decent fwiw but I do find some peoples attitude a bit strange, almost scared to move forward.Exactly, so many people on here seem to be over the moon with a 29 year old geezer from Preston and anything with slight risk involved is deemed “dangerous” and “lacking experience”.
Our European signings last season revolutionised our attack, Haji got better with each game, Van Ewijk, one of the best signings we’ve ever made, Sakamoto, turns defenders inside out for literal fun, Torp does a bit of everything and has a hell of a shot on him.
I genuinely don’t get this obsession with sticking to players in the championship and league 1, we need to be picking the cream of the crop from around Europe if we want to get out of the championship, forever scrapping with Preston, Milwall, Norwich for 8 place.
I think the point with somebody like Browne is that he's got that bit of experience and know-how in this league. We can be a bit naive at times and we've lost a significant amount of experience this year, two former captains so we do need somebody to help take on those roles.Exactly, so many people on here seem to be over the moon with a 29 year old geezer from Preston and anything with slight risk involved is deemed “dangerous” and “lacking experience”.
Our European signings last season revolutionised our attack, Haji got better with each game, Van Ewijk, one of the best signings we’ve ever made, Sakamoto, turns defenders inside out for literal fun, Torp does a bit of everything and has a hell of a shot on him.
I genuinely don’t get this obsession with sticking to players in the championship and league 1, we need to be picking the cream of the crop from around Europe if we want to get out of the championship, forever scrapping with Preston, Milwall, Norwich for 8th place.
I think Browne would be decent fwiw but I do find some peoples attitude a bit strange, almost scared to move forward.
But what if Browne just didn't want to come here?But if you break that down it just doesn’t make sense. Case for Browne. Proven, no risk, no fee, just wages. Case for Stamenic. Not proven, therefore a risk, 4m fee and wages.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?