Don't get me wrong here - not suggesting what anyone ought to think...merely considering different attitudes.
For the actual facts I would have to have been there & seen, & heard & applied my own interpretation.
I am in full agreement with you though from what I do see & hear, which are other's reports, he is a very unpleasant character. So are lots of others. In our society once someone serves their time our benevolent, forgiving society tries to draw a line under the incident. Could/should/would an employer with such a strong conscience give a job to someone who has defrauded an elderly person out of their life savings, but served their time, a job? Or would that be discrimination?
With the level of mysogyny shown on here today I think we might be on GMK around 2010.
You'll be posting soon about how great SISU are and anybody who thinks different obviously knows nothing about how businesses are run to totally bring back that "vibe".
If the offender isn't rehabilitated or shows any sign of remorse or guilt for his actions then no, he doesn't deserve a 14th chance.