Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
He hadn’t nothing to do with signing mccallum
So if the recruitment (even for U23) is not part of his remit and is decided by others you can't argue he's been given more money can you? All players signed for U23's haven't been signed by him and thus can't be included in his transfer spending. And that's assuming all first team signings were entirely his decision - not uncommon for players to be bought/sold against the wishes of a manager.