skybluegod
Well-Known Member
Mcdonald imo needs to start we looked so much better tonight when he came on him and mcgoldrick both have a little bit of pace so when they make runs the defense is stretched and we made more chances.
Mcdonald or ball? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter skybluegod
- Start date
Sky Blue Sheepy
New Member
McDonald for me. I don't have a problem with Ball but McDonald is a good finisher once he gets regular games and we do need them atm
Black6Osprey
New Member
McDonald all day long.
Yorkshire SB
Well-Known Member
Ball offers nothing, don't understand what he actually brings to a football team.
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
so McDonald he does makes us so much more threatening
bamalamafizzfazz
New Member
Roy O'Donovan :facepalm:
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
cody, balls had a good spell but needs resting now
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
he looked good vs stevenege
Jimmy Hill's Chin
Well-Known Member
Has to be McDonald. Ball looks awful.
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
Looks like robins doesn't rate him
UNCLE MONTY
New Member
That's the problem. Cody for me should be playing every game I just worry about how injury prone he seems to be. He also looks overweight from what I have seen of him this season. Has to be a better bet than Ball though. Not sure why MR doesn't rate Elliott, looked ok to me.
ashbyjan
Well-Known Member
Elliott works hard but is not a natural striker, Ball should be the focal point of the attack but seems overweight and hardly ever wins a header, McDonald is a proper striker, always harrying defenders and knows how to find space in the box - if he was a better finisher he wouldn't be with us but he's certainly the best of the ones we have. Wonder how it would be if we had Cody and Ball upfront with McG playing wide right?
kevinleftpeg
New Member
this just shows how desperate things are. IMHO they are both not even 'average' & defo not good enough at this level