McGoldrick (1 Viewer)

[Deleted member 4232]

Aside from all of the bile that makes up todays chat. I thought he had a good game. Took his goal well, displayed good presence and maturity on the ball, was willing to run at defenders, and showed a threat on either foot. Could score a good few goals. Would like to see him and McDonald gel, as I could see them being quite annoying for defenders.

 

---

[ccfcway]

would mean dropping elliott who is the only one who gives "110%"

 

[ajsccfc]

He looked at times like the only player who was actually trying to win the game.

 

[SkyBlue_Bear83]

Was the best player out of both teams.

Only player for us to play for longer than 30 mins

 

[Deleted member 4232]

would mean dropping elliott who is the only one who gives "110%"

I'd play Elliot behind those two, in a 4-3-1-2. In a CAM role. I could see him bomb onto some knock-downs and smashing some long range, definitely has the power.

 

[Macca]

Totally agree with this. The one bright spark

 

[ggrady]

Why did he go left mid at the end when he is right footed?

 

[ccfcway]

Why did he go left mid at the end when he is right footed?

"Coventry in having a striker on the wing shocker"

 

[Coventry La La La]

Why did he go left mid at the end when he is right footed?

I'm guessing it was so he could cut in and shoot and on his preferred right foot.

 

[PVA]

Why did he go left mid at the end when he is right footed?

Inverted wingers, very popular at the moment.

He was good today though, even without the spectacular goal he was the best player on the pitch.

 

[sw88]

He looks a very pleasing acquisition from what I've seen. But I won't hype him up too much too soon!

 

[Nick]

I like the look of him, he has fire in his belly and something to prove

He played well against burton too!

 

[sw88]

We'll soon train it out of him