Nick
Administrator
How unusual to have new users appear when we're in court :facepalm:
Yep, and kicking off as well because their post gets moved into the appropriate thread. Anybody would think they are just trying to stir up trouble a bit.
How unusual to have new users appear when we're in court :facepalm:
Yes, as in the football club. I'm sure there's technicalilites of exactly which branch of SISU is doing certain things but I find most of the time there's little point making the distinction between them and as they are our owners and dealing with matters relating to the stadium we play in it all comes under the umbrella of CCFC.
Yep, and kicking off as well because their post gets moved into the appropriate thread. Anybody would think they are just trying to stir up trouble a bit.
How unusual to have new users appear when we're in court :facepalm:
Yes new user after having old account blocked by Nick , after he sent me abusive message !
Nick , your like a child who takes his ball home . anything that does nt agree with you , You "deal with " Like a mardy child , and then send abusive messages about My family !
Nick , your like a child who takes his ball home . anything that does nt agree with you , You "deal with " Like a mardy child , and then send abusive messages about My family !
They fucking should be.They are all doing their stretches.
I’ve been ignoring the court case for so long I’d forgotten what it was all about. Just reading the CT article about it there I have to wonder if there’s not a chance SISU might actually win. If they do what’s the likely impact for the footballing side of the business. Is there any chance this might result in a bigger wages budget for next season (assuming we’re still in League One)? Or will SISU just take this money out of the pot for their hedge fund malarkey?
Now onto talk of rent levels at the time of the fall out between the club and ACL.Sisu QC says the great majority of clubs were paying substantially less than the £1.3m annual rent CCFC were paying at the time - and nobody else was paying more than half a million.
Coventry City FC was paying more than three times the level of rent of the next club in League One.
He adds: “Ms Seppala said this can’t go on.”
Justice Treacy: “It’s presumably a much bigger ground?”
Sisu QC: “An empty ground costs more. When you’re in League One crowds drop.”
Surely the lawyer should have compared it to rent in the leagues above? I am pretty sure Championship and maybe a couple of Prem teams pay less than £1.3 million per year for matchday only rent.
Doesn't really work the same when you compare it to Yeovil or Cralwy somebody like that who was in L1 then..
No expert, but the judge seems to be picking him apart.
Maybe you should be there representing SISU Nick?
It doesn't sound like he is doing a good enough job for you?
So an empty ground costs more?
So an empty ground costs more?
So an empty ground costs more?
When you're in league 1 crowds drop and whose fault was it that we ended up in league 1?
If you’re paying the same rent and your crowd drops, so it’s costing you more. Pretty self explanatory, I thought?
I thought it might be on ITV for a minute.
Apparently Judge Rinder isn't doing our case
If you’re paying the same rent and your crowd drops, so it’s costing you more. Pretty self explanatory, I thought?
I always felt the rent agreement was naïve - it should have been written to scale down in the event of relegation. So yeah... basically what BHSB said.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's what I mean, since I watched Making a Murderer and reading stuff on here I am an expert. I am just waiting for some tampered evidence to be revealed or something.
I don't think the wigs would suit me.
So an empty ground costs more?
When you're in league 1 crowds drop and whose fault was it that we ended up in league 1?
No, it costs the same, but it makes you less money. Our rent doesn't go up as attendances go down.
Don't get me wrong, it was way too expensive.
I see others in this thread talking about how it compares badly to other Championship and some Premier League grounds — any examples spring to mind (I’ve literally no idea how much they’d typically rent for, in fact I always thought most clubs owned their grounds)?
The club were offered s sliding scale rent but said no. It would go up if they were promoted. That's where they believed they were heading. They asked for fixed.
Christ, really? They really do deserve to lose this.