The whole point is that a huge turnout at MK isn't proving me wrong in my belief that NOPM will fail to persuade SISU to give up on their strategy. Indeed, it encourages them to continue as it shows fans forgive and forget, hand over cash and sustain a club regardless if it hangs on in there.
Ta for the backhanded compliment mind
One thing that will (probably) happen, is the clubs that left their roots but returned (or are close to doing so completely, back to the lane where they made their name) have by far the lower gate that day, than the club that left its roots but never returned. If you were a shadowy nefarious owner, that would give you food for thought about the sticking power of crowds. Even if our club were to return, it wouldn't exactly convince our owners we mattered after all.
Might be worth pointing out as well, the day it's confirmed we'll never return is the day that hopefully we all bog off to watch Bristol Rovers v Wimbledon.
The whole point is that a huge turnout at MK isn't proving me wrong in my belief that NOPM will fail to persuade SISU to give up on their strategy. Indeed, it encourages them to continue as it shows fans forgive and forget, hand over cash and sustain a club regardless if it hangs on in there.
Ta for the backhanded compliment mind
One thing that will (probably) happen, is the clubs that left their roots but returned (or are close to doing so completely, back to the lane where they made their name) have by far the lower gate that day, than the club that left its roots but never returned. If you were a shadowy nefarious owner, that would give you food for thought about the sticking power of crowds. Even if our club were to return, it wouldn't exactly convince our owners we mattered after all.
Might be worth pointing out as well, the day it's confirmed we'll never return is the day that hopefully we all bog off to watch Bristol Rovers v Wimbledon.
You've totally lost me. How does snubbing home games but going to away games in large numbers encourage SISU to continue with their misguided strategy? They've dropped a clanger and made a huge error of judgement testified by paltry home attendances resulting in them losing money hand over fist. I don't mean to be rude or offensive, but your talking utter bollocks.
I think you can read this both ways- like with most scenarios.
Yes- I agree the extent of the support at MK affirms that the fan base is there, as such supports rudimentary marketing analysis to suggest success would indeed fill any "home" stadium. Equally though you might also conclude this is a very clear 'V' sign to the owners Northampton strategy.
Lets not forget though, those like me that choose not to go to Northampton are bloody desperate to watch our team- it might just be as simple as that with little more analysis required- we can all be gulity of over analysing everything dont you think from time to time?
It's which away game it is.
There are other places a large crowd could gather that weekend, that would convey a far more powerful message...
I don't mean to be rude or offensive, but you're a moron btw
We going to go the personal route now?
Ta for engaging
Over analysing? Maybe, but here's one club in particular where it's probably worth avoiding.
if we were going excessively picky we could add the likes of Gillingham (Scally supported the move), Crawley (shadowy unknown owners with opaque objectives) and the like, but their dubious practices are less in the public eye.
One club that is in the public eye for such a move is MK Dons. One thing that doesn't happen is that anybody bar Coventry fans notices Coventry fans. Here was a chance to actually make a story by thinking outside the box.
Oh yeah, I'll add the edit as the 'bloody desperate to watch our team' is actually the argument for going to MK I can best understand, I can buy that as a reason for going.
guess I'm just a dad when all said and done?
How many fans travel from Wimbledon to Milton Keynes now ?
The whole point is that a huge turnout at MK isn't proving me wrong in my belief that NOPM will fail to persuade SISU to give up on their strategy. Indeed, it encourages them to continue as it shows fans forgive and forget, hand over cash and sustain a club regardless if it hangs on in there.
Ta for the backhanded compliment mind
One thing that will (probably) happen, is the clubs that left their roots but returned (or are close to doing so completely, back to the lane where they made their name) have by far the lower gate that day, than the club that left its roots but never returned. If you were a shadowy nefarious owner, that would give you food for thought about the sticking power of crowds. Even if our club were to return, it wouldn't exactly convince our owners we mattered after all.
Might be worth pointing out as well, the day it's confirmed we'll never return is the day that hopefully we all bog off to watch Bristol Rovers v Wimbledon.
Sisu are running out of cash to keep paying the wages, each months pay day they have to find hard cash ( not figures on paper of how much they are worth) to pay the wages. The support at MK wil send a message to the team that the fans are still there.
The difference with this is MK Dons are a completely separate club to Wimbledon.
If it was 10 years ago I wouldn't be going, as then the boro of Merton had been robbed of its team. However Wimbledon now exists as a league club in the form of AFC.
We as city fans have a clear goal, get the sky blues back to the Ricoh.
Any form of boycott of MK Dons has no end goal. What do you want MK Dons to do? The people of Wimbledon certainly wouldn't want them back.
Im afraid any principled stance against MK Dons is 10 years too late.
It's a stance for CCFC, showing the consequences and memories remain long after the event, as opposed to being forgotten.
Attendance at MK shows that the goal of getting back to the Ricoh will easily be compromised if something else is offered somewhere else.
Attendance at MK shows that the goal of getting back to the Ricoh will easily be compromised if something else is offered somewhere else.
That's a pretty strong allegation to make, can you back that up with any proof?
MK a short journey? It's 16 miles further than Northampton..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
The fast train is 27 min, shorter time to milton keynes than northampton so must be classed as a short journey compared to going to northampton. If you walk it is longer.
MK a short journey? It's 16 miles further than Northampton..
It's a stance for CCFC, showing the consequences and memories remain long after the event, as opposed to being forgotten.
Attendance at MK shows that the goal of getting back to the Ricoh will easily be compromised if something else is offered somewhere else.
That's a pretty strong allegation to make, can you back that up with any proof?
Absolutely Norman.
My reason for going is to show Sisu what they are losing out on. It is one of the few grounds in this league that
A) will hold as many fans as we can take
B) is close enough for us to take as many fans as possible
It also represents a great experience to be part of a large following, these things are self perpetuating. This season, we are going to end up with a statistic that shows that we have averaged more fans away from home, than at home. That sends a clear message to Sisu.
You are missing out here!
The word "are" in the original post needed to be followed by the word "probably" as otherwise it appears to be stating a fact not an opinion. I agree that they are likely to be suffering from a lower income at Sixfields but we don't know for a fact that they are running short of cash. No one has provided any proof one way or the other about the state of the finances of our owners. I'm not defending Sisu and think that they are the worst owners we've ever had and deserve the disgust they get from us.It's called an opinion-one I share, as evidenced by the increased PR effort in recent months dating back to the Seppalla "interview" with Reid. I don't think we have to "prove" our opinions, do we? Not unless we're accusing anyone of something illegal.
The word "are" in the original post needed to be followed by the word "probably" as otherwise it appears to be stating a fact not an opinion. I agree that they are likely to be suffering from a lower income at Sixfields but we don't know for a fact that they are running short of cash. No one has provided any proof one way or the other about the state of the finances of our owners. I'm not defending Sisu and think that they are the worst owners we've ever had and deserve the disgust they get from us.
Im sorry but I can't take anything serious that someone who's been to sixfields comes out with. If you've been once or have a st you've all contributed to our exile from Coventry.
I'd actually like all that to be true and just wanted some proof that it was.Unless they've threatened to sue over the issue, it really doesn't. Nobody speaks like that IRL, James-or should I say Perry! Demanding that they do is a little restrictive and unrealistic. For example, "Otium are fucked. They're behind the 8-ball, up shit creek without a paddle and haven't got a bucket to piss in". Now, where exactly would you like me to insert the word "probably"?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?