MISERABLE (CWR) IAN - Rubbish again was it ??? (1 Viewer)

johnniericoh · Oct 19, 2011

Comments please

PUSB

BenInTurin · Oct 19, 2011

Does anyone from here try to phone up? I prefer cwr to mercia but they do seem to always speak to the same miserable people!

Macca · Oct 19, 2011

johnniericoh said:
Comments please

PUSB

too busy enjoying the result to be honest

georgehudson · Oct 19, 2011

far too busy being up themselves,
slightly better than nausia ( oops mercia ),
still mass debating (two words), upon their own self esteem,
stuart hall should cover us, even though he is in his dotage,
PUSB

stevo_ccfc · Oct 19, 2011

Did that clown phone in moaning again?

Mumford and Daughter · Oct 19, 2011

I even tried phoning but the lady at bbc said she could not understand me cos of my voice

and no i werent going to moan

BenInTurin · Oct 19, 2011

Mumford and Daughter said:
and no i werent going to moan

That's why she couldn't understand you...

Kuklinski · Oct 19, 2011

So does anybody know if Ian rang up last night?

Nonleagueherewecome · Oct 19, 2011

I didn't hear him.

wingy · Oct 19, 2011

There was a text read out near the end from an Ian read out by Linnel ,it was'nt negative ,draw conclusion

stgeorge1966 · Oct 19, 2011

Heard it all and Ian from Shipston did not ring.!!!. it was all positive news last night may be that's why the bore didn't ring!

Covstu · Oct 19, 2011

I love people who have a reputation for all the wrong reasons! I love this people who slate the team and pick out players but then say they were sitting at home listening to the radio!!!

sky blue zam · Oct 22, 2011

Im sure this idiot phoned up twice today saying the same thing both times

Nonleagueherewecome · Oct 22, 2011

He was on at the end going on about 442. He really is a pratt of the highest degree.

stupot07 · Oct 22, 2011

It is quite literally the most boring football he's ever seen

Nonleagueherewecome · Oct 22, 2011

Whereas first half was the best display of entertaining football I've seen in 18 months.

les_miserables · Oct 22, 2011

Nonleagueherewecome said:
Whereas first half was the best display of entertaining football I've seen in 18 months.

Trouble is there are two halves to a game of football and we always tend to play one. Once Burnley took over control the result was inevitable.

Didge76 · Oct 22, 2011

Now let's get this right, do you all agree that this diamond formation really works? I certainly don't and agree with Ian that 442 would be better suited. Think what he is getting at is the lack of width meaning alot of the time the opposition have 2 players up against our fullbacks! At the end of the day it's alright playing nice football but when you don't win that's what matters, nothing against Thorn but his win ratio is shit.

johnniericoh · Oct 22, 2011

I see it as we have an abundance of width with Christie and Hussey very often parked wide on the halfway line awaiting balls from defence and midfield (of which there are plenty during the course of most games).

But again and again its that FINAL THIRD when our forwards go missing very often chasing down deadends instead of lurking in the pen area.

Simples

PUSB

wingy · Oct 22, 2011

Theres a void in that the midfield do not back up the strikers ,we never get enough bodies around the area ,to take avantage of knockdowns ,clearances

Mumford and Daughter · Oct 22, 2011

wingy said:
Theres a void in that the midfield do not back up the strikers ,we never get enough bodies around the area ,to take avantage of knockdowns ,clearances

Exactly thats why the position at the tip of the diamond is so important. Bell didn't play too bad but he isn't right for that role. I personally like to see juke and platt with Cody running in picking up the loose balls. He looked a Livewire today and a right nusiance

stupot07 · Oct 22, 2011

Why would we play a striker who natural inclination is to play off the defenders shoulder at the tip of diamond in midfield? The reason Cody looked dangerous was because he was always on the last man gambling.

Didge76 · Oct 23, 2011

Sorry guys but to be Frank let's fuck this diamond crap and go with 442 and try it out. Surely it won't hurt for a few games, play Baker(when fit) and Mcsheff(when fit) and see how it goes. I know it probably won't make a jot of difference but surely it's worth a go. Thorn needs to sort it out because theres no plan B!!!!!!!!

wingy · Oct 23, 2011

Listened to the post match phone in on i player earlier ,there was another Ian called around 44mins in .I believe he's a guy called Ian Small ,an absolute City zealot,writes a column in jimbo's twist and shout and travels to and from his home in France to watch us,the subject turned to the new contracts offered some of our percieved less able players ,Linnel put the Sisu case of increasing the asset value of the club,thus enabling them garner more investment from existing and new lines of speculator .Ian pointed out that in any market people will only pay what a product is worth and essentially these guys hold no value ,thus they are effectively taking from the business.Conversely it only increases Sisu's strangle hold on the club by ,as we know detering potential suitors ,so why are we all apethetically ,passively ,standing by watching them driving our club into oblivion ,they obviously see us in that way as they've felt emboldened enough to release the ken /Igwe statements this week,For christs sake City fans wake up and smell the coffee,please don't just roll over while they rape our club

MISERABLE (CWR) IAN - Rubbish again was it ??? (1 Viewer)

Member

Facebook User

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

New Member

Facebook User

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Active Member

Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency