The Freedom Of Information requests made of neighbouring boroughs, combined with the lack of any quantifiable progress; viewed in conjunction with the costly Judicial review in respect of a stadium they've 'moved on from' tells you everything. It's horse-shit. Jack it in and get negotiating candidly, Mr Fisher
I wish I had ten minutes interviewing TF. He wouldn't squirm his way with me with his answers I assure you. He doesn't even believe what he says you can tell. Poor man.
"So Timmy, is it right you are just a 2 faced stooge working for an evil and corrupt empire who are running this fucking club into the fucking ground. ? What do you fucking say to that you fucking posh twat?"
Yep, that should work.
"So Timmy, is it right you are just a 2 faced stooge working for an evil and corrupt empire who are running this fucking club into the fucking ground. ? What do you fucking say to that you fucking posh twat?"
Yep, that should work.
"So Timmy, is it right you are just a 2 faced stooge working for an evil and corrupt empire who are running this fucking club into the fucking ground. ? What do you fucking say to that you fucking posh twat?"
Yep, that should work.
More insults. I think you'll find the poster offered up already this morning a very considered piece. At no point has he/she insinuated that they would address Fisher in such a way.
But hey - don't let facts stand in the way of your usual diatribe. Why don't you address the ambition of this thread, as opposed to attacking it's contributors? Oh, just remembered, it's because your conscience won't afford you to do so...
Assuming he could get to Fisher with you all over him like a cheap suit.
i read the court transcripts cover to cover and never once did the SISU QC bring up the fact that the Council & ACL were bringing presure to bare on their suppliers regarding the alledged proposed new stadium! I would have thought it would have been part of a key arguament that ACL/CCC were trying to distress them?More Fisher lies, if he did believe what he was saying (which he doesn't) what does he think is going to happen when they eventually do announce the land and apply for planning permission. At that point the evil council (in his eyes) will then be able to apply the pressure and if they have the powers he alleges them to have then they won't get planning permission and they will be left with a piece of land they can't use. It's not possible to do this in secret, if the council really are someone they have to defeat to achieve this (which they don't) then they may as well get it out of the way.
There is no new stadium, thats what the evidence tells us. It was meant to be finished in 2 years, at the current rate they won't even have planning permission by then.
i read the court transcripts cover to cover and never once did the SISU QC bring up the fact that the Council & ACL were bringing presure to bare on their suppliers regarding the alledged proposed new stadium! I would have thought it would have been part of a key arguament that ACL/CCC were trying to distress them?
The "ambition" of this thread, oh lofty talk for basically you all saying is "Fisher is a bullshitter " . I think we know that. What that has to do with my conscience is irrelevent.
i read the court transcripts cover to cover and never once did the SISU QC bring up the fact that the Council & ACL were bringing presure to bare on their suppliers regarding the alledged proposed new stadium! I would have thought it would have been part of a key arguament that ACL/CCC were trying to distress them?
i read the court transcripts cover to cover and never once did the SISU QC bring up the fact that the Council & ACL were bringing presure to bare on their suppliers regarding the alledged proposed new stadium! I would have thought it would have been part of a key arguament that ACL/CCC were trying to distress them?
The excuse changed since last year.. when I get time I'll find an older quote, but if I remember correctly the previous excuse for secrecy was commercial confidentiality required because there were 2 different sites & they didn't want the respective owners to know about each other..
I am sorry Mr Fisher, but that sounds incredibly vague and inappropriate, with no substantial evidence.
That said ACL's financial pursuit of Northampton wouldn't help matters..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I thought ACL dropped it and it never went to court.
Yet another 'smoking gun' that presumably get left in the metaphorical gun cabinet. As they all must have, as I saw or heard none. I genuinely expected some anti-CCC/ACL revelations to come out of this process. They don't exist. They can't
I am sorry Mr Fisher, but that sounds incredibly vague and inappropriate, with no substantial evidence.
That said ACL's financial pursuit of Northampton wouldn't help matters..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The excuse changed since last year.. when I get time I'll find an older quote, but if I remember correctly the previous excuse for secrecy was commercial confidentiality required because there were 2 different sites & they didn't want the respective owners to know about each other..
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-owners-considering-land-5710823Tim Fisher confirmed this evening he had been told by CBRE that heads of terms were now completed on one site – but said the club was bound by commercial confidentiality not to reveal any of the prospective sites, as doing so might unhelpfully push up the potential price.
Mark Labovitch, a non-executive director at the club, said negotiations were under way about two sites for a new stadium, but said it would be "suicide commercially" to reveal them