letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Correct..
It tells me 80% couldn't be bothered.
i didn't misread anything. it was a tongue in cheek comment regarding the size of the "home" crowds at sixfields that i didn't expect to be taken seriously.
Ok - the typed words makes it difficult to tell. There should be 'tounge-in-cheek' emoticon.
It tells me 80% couldn't be bothered.
Correct..
It might suggest that if Sisu get the Ricoh we will see crowds of about 6k... probably about right.
If a new owner was there it would probably be 12k. Go figure what is best for CCFC.
I think that's bollocks. I think the support would remain around the 10/12K mark. You can't base your evidence of that on 500 responses.
It tells me 80% couldn't be bothered.
I think that's bollocks. I think the support would remain around the 10/12K mark. You can't base your evidence of that on 500 responses.
Well common sense would suggest gates were lower than 10k before and a large body now hates Sisu with a passion (some evidence in this poll if it were needed)- not you obviously. So gates of 6 or 7k probably right. But logic has never been your strong point.
Agree. In fact I think if we came back crowds would rise temporarily.
So Sixfield boycotters, NOPM, this poll is obviously nonsense and a few 1000 Cov fans wouldnt go if Sisu remained owners at the Ricoh?
Agree with this, the novelty of having Coventry city playing in Coventry would probably swell the crowd for the first few games. All this is madnessAgree. In fact I think if we came back crowds would rise temporarily.
I'm a boycotter of ALL games and I would go back to the Ricoh like a shot if we returned there. I would bet most people would. Playing back in the City takes precedent over getting rid of SISU IMHO. We can try and do that once we are back home.
the team got us relegated by not getting enough points not the people in the stands expressing their feelings about the shoddy owners.How cunning!
Force ACL and sisu to make a deal so we can go back and have 15.000 shout 'sisu-out' - waving banners and sing anti Tim Fisher songs at each home game.
Just like the old days ... you know, the season we got relegated.
Well common sense would suggest gates were lower than 10k before and a large body now hates Sisu with a passion (some evidence in this poll if it were needed)- not you obviously. So gates of 6 or 7k probably right. But logic has never been your strong point.
I'm a boycotter of ALL games and I would go back to the Ricoh like a shot if we returned there. I would bet most people would. Playing back in the City takes precedent over getting rid of SISU IMHO. We can try and do that once we are back home.
It tells me 80% couldn't be bothered.
How, by shouting "SISU OUT", by boycotting the Ricoh, by signing petitions? Or is there some other guaranteed way to get rid of these maggots?
Well, it's a email poll, so those asked are members of either the Trust or signed up to KCiC.
In that case the results aren't really surprising.
I don't think the KCiC poll can be used to state other than those who support KCiC want the club to return to the Ricoh.
The interesting point is the large percentage of KCiC supporters who are firmly in the sisu-out corner. Maybe not surprising as it seem to be the most active and most vocal group.
Can I ask how the response rate was? How many mails sent out, how many resonded?
What would the results be if a poll was made at the turnstiles at sixfields with the exact same questions?
Ooh, hold on....
"In reality returning to the Ricoh is very easy: Joy Seppala simply has to say ‘I will accept Gary Hoffman's offer of three years rent free at the Ricoh plus paying all compensation costs at Northampton"
Is that true? Is the offer on the table to Sisu? Would The Club get the Matchday income from tickets etc (ie is "free" really. "Free") - I remember Fisher poo-pooed this offer because of strings attached or a flaw in the thinking, but at a time of High Passions in the race to get out of Admin just before the start of the season.... Now with things relatively calmer and The Sky Blue Trust making a positive policy change to encourage calm discussion can that option be unpacked again, put on the table, and potentially be the foundation to a return to Coventry?
would be inaccurate due to a very small poll,maybe include the Hill.Well, it's a email poll, so those asked are members of either the Trust or signed up to KCiC.
In that case the results aren't really surprising.
I don't think the KCiC poll can be used to state other than those who support KCiC want the club to return to the Ricoh.
The interesting point is the large percentage of KCiC supporters who are firmly in the sisu-out corner. Maybe not surprising as it seem to be the most active and most vocal group.
Can I ask how the response rate was? How many mails sent out, how many resonded?
What would the results be if a poll was made at the turnstiles at sixfields with the exact same questions?
Why are so many people bothered about us not being in Coventry if they won't go if we return?
The Sisu apologists continuing to try and discredit a poll that tells us all what we knew anyway. Thieving scumbags take our club out of Coventry. 90% + fans won't support that.
Might be something to do with Coventry having a football club in Coventry before some twats in suits started having a dick waving competition resulting in the club being moved elsewhere. Just a guess like...
The Sisu apologists continuing to try and discredit a poll that tells us all what we knew anyway. Thieving scumbags take our club out of Coventry. 90% + fans won't support that.
The Sisu apologists continuing to try and discredit a poll that tells us all what we knew anyway. Thieving scumbags take our club out of Coventry. 90% + fans won't support that.
The Sisu apologists continuing to try and discredit a poll that tells us all what we knew anyway. Thieving scumbags take our club out of Coventry. 90% + fans won't support that.
The Sisu apologists continuing to try and discredit a poll that tells us all what we knew anyway. Thieving scumbags take our club out of Coventry. 90% + fans won't support that.
What difference does it make if you don't go? Genuine question. You can't say to them "come back to our 32,000 seater stadium in Coventry please. Oh by the way, I still won't attend." Where is the incentive for them to come back? It's not just rent, all other costs are higher.
I am pretty sure more than 90% of fans are unhappy with their move. I am not sure where this sisu apologist stuff comes from, the poll tells us nothing at all except that Michael is a researcher at Warwick uni (no disrespect.to the job or Michael) but as its a tiny percentage of our fanbase it doesn't show too much.
It is a very misleading article.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?