Mowbray should have the full 2 years
To call for Mowbray to get the boot is ludicrous in the extreme. He has done far better than virtually all those we've had since we left the Premier League. He has had limited funds and support from the owners, but has given us a reasonable chance with a squad that is mostly quite ordinary.
Mowbray may not be Pep Guardiola, but this is Division Three and we are unlikely to find anyone better at our level. He's done better than most with his loans which has helped him, of course. Walsall have sacked their manager today - let's see where that gets them.
I fear that Mowbray will walk in the summer, and that would be a pity. There will be Championship clubs with bigger budgets who will want a change for next season and I would be pleasantly surprised if he is still here come August. Given our track record with managers, I dread to think who would replace him.
pessimistic or not would never bet on City losing9/1 double for us to lose against shrewsbury and blackpool - if we are so pessimistic, is this a banker
its crazy that anyone calling for his head
yeah its a bad run, yeah we can be pissed off or frustrated at him but ffs give him AT LEAST 1 full season with us!
only after 46 games can we see how he did. unfair to not give him chance to pull us out of slide.
Agree also who would we get in to change and turn it around long term
its crazy that anyone calling for his head
yeah its a bad run, yeah we can be pissed off or frustrated at him but ffs give him AT LEAST 1 full season with us!
only after 46 games can we see how he did. unfair to not give him chance to pull us out of slide.
Correct.....I said on a thread after last weeks defeat that I can't think of a manager who has ever won promotion in less than a full season
.
Furthermore, would just like to add, TM managed to scrape a lot (8 I think?) of ugly wins at the back end of last season, with a team that wasn't his. He wants to win games the right way, not the ugly way, maybe it is stubborn, but there is no doubt about his ability as a manager. We will win more games this season.
But then the question must be asked, is this or is this not, the best team we have had for many seasons?Thing is, there are *always* alternatives, that's a given.
It's more the craziness of ripping it up and starting again, when we can blame yet another manager. The strategy's set higher than the cloub manager, he'll always have constraints.
If a slump was abnormal for us then yep, by all means get rid of the boss man but... it isn't!
But then the question must be asked, is this or is this not, the best team we have had for many seasons?
Seen through Sky Blue glasses.
Or alternatively we've got...
An unproven keeper who's played next to no games.
A choice at right back of a player on his slide due to age, an inexperienced lad playing off the back of his Dad's name, a Swedish bloke who's never played in England before now.
Centre back is the sliding old guy, two kids with limited experience, or the archetypal league one centre back... who yeovil decided wasn't worth having in the end.
Left back is a former non league player or a kid with limited experience and confidence.. or a left midfielder who's not been given a contract for 6 months prior to us.
Right midfield is a kid who's gone on loan repeatedly.
Centre mid includes a bloke with a rep as a teenager who's slid down to our level, with question marks about motivation, and a guy who's come from a side who were relegated from this division last season, or two lads who have yet to play a full season.
Even centre forward sees a kid who's yet to complete a full season in the first team... and he's our star.
yeah its a bad run, yeah we can be pissed off or frustrated at him but ffs give him AT LEAST 1 full season with us!
I think we've moved past bad run. Since going top there is only one team in the division who have done worse than us and they are rooted to the bottom of the table!
The demise of our season for me is a lot down to bad luck with the injuries to reda and turner
Is it really 'bad luck' that those two were injured?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?