Nick
Administrator
The same as they demanded money for a court case from a Charity while distressing them?
It's not Dick Turpin asking demanding it !!!
It's what they calculate Sisu silly court cases have cost them that they can't retrieve.
Why deal with them again if everytime it costs them money ?
Sometimes you need to take off your Sisu glasses, step back and understand the reasoning.
Agree, every side should be pressured. The council come out and make statements demanding money, but nobody really bats an eye.
Nope, I may well agree with the headline, but will the majority rely on headlines and hearsaySo you are agreeing with what I am saying then aren't you?
All it takes is a headline saying "Wasps offered an amazing deal" and the majority of people will only read that and not question it.
Wycombe was a stupid move, too.
Rugby clubs have made some stupid ones... they mostly end up going back home in some sense though.
Or, in Richmond's case, finding they couldn't sustain a top tier Rugby club so reforming at a lower level, and returning to their roots.
Now *there's* a model that should be welcomed.
They were asked to move out by QPR to accommodate Fulham.
The same as they demanded money for a court case from a Charity while distressing them?
So?
How does that not make Wycombe a stupid move?
You made it out they had a choice
Yes the £29,000 it cost Higgs to deal with them.
You might want to dig a little deeper into that and look into the ownership structure of QPR and Wasps and the finance Wasps took out against a massively overvalued asset.They were asked to move out by QPR to accommodate Fulham.
Is that how you operate your business? Anyone can ask you for money and you just blindly pay it?It's what they calculate Sisu silly court cases have cost them that they can't retrieve.
It cost them that because they weren't owed that were they?
How about the charity the council are screwing over at the minute?
Going to depend on the story that can be constructed.
- number of sites already considered, with FL involvement but nothing suitable
- CCC blocking proposed partnership at new site in city
- new site in City looked favourably on by FL
- Current landlord not willing to engage in talks
- CCC policy favouring Rugby and swimming
- CCC not dealing with club because of legal matters going on that are not the clubs
- unable to negotiate longer Academy deal
- Incomes being restricted despite high L1 average crowd numbers
- improvements have been made to being self sufficient so being responsible financially
- perceived conspiracy against the club
- club future at risk and only solution
- funding available to do it
- no site in Coventry or close to available
- alternative site or groundshare available for immediate use
- etc etc
Never said they were owed it. I said it's what it cost them for dealing with Sisu.
You will need to enlighten me on the charity story you've dug up.
I haven't "dug up" anything, its about CCC hammering a charity in Coventry. Strange it isn't widely reported though.
A city council has been forced to apologise after a report found it conducted an "unreasonable campaign" against a company and its director.
Seems that the BBC are also going through the council's dustbins. It must be getting crowded there.There's only you and Grendel that go through the councils dustbins
No they haven't.
People are either being naive or just a bit simple.
Which category do you fit into ?
Yes the £29,000 it cost Higgs to deal with them.
A charity that spend 30K of its money on lawyers on a single agreement has either really shitty lawyers or a poorly organised business.
You mean the charity that's made up by a family of lawyers
There's only you and Grendel that go through the councils dustbins
You mean the charity that's made up by a family of lawyers
Didn't realise that was the case. Even more ridiculous.
Yeah that professional they tie balloons to peoples cars whilst in the middle of a legal dispute....Perhaps that's why they wont deal with Sisu , because they are professional people they can see through there charade.
Yeah that professional they tie balloons to peoples cars whilst in the middle of a legal dispute....
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Yeah that professional they tie balloons to peoples cars whilst in the middle of a legal dispute....
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Perhaps that's why they wont deal with Sisu , because they are professional people they can see through there charade.
I posted a link to the CCC story in the 'Council helps football club' thread, which you'd posted on a few times, but have now oddly stopped. Actually, not that odd, as it's indefensible.
Firstly WASP did not buy the Ricoh. The freehold has never been for sale.
Perhaps that's why they wont deal with Sisu , because they are professional people they can see through there charade.
Firstly WASP did not buy the Ricoh. The freehold has never been for sale. This saga will go on and on and it's too time consuming to connect on here and see the rumour and conjecture getting out of hand on just about every subject matter re CCFC. The council have not dealt with the Ricoh situation well from day one and are culpable for many of our problems now along with our gracious owners. SISU have a right to take what legal action they think appropriate for them. That may not sit well with many but what is the alternative?
As for a 20 year deal - first I've heard this mentioned? If true it would be a great deal depending on the type of deal it was? A sub lease of sorts that was assignable? That would give the club an 'asset' to move on with the football club and a route for SISU to exit.
We can keep guessing and speculating all day but the in the mean time we must concentrate on the field and get promotions. Do that and the off field problems will start to be resolved very quickly I feel...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?