It would help if he said what action he wanted them to take.
What does he want them to do?
Is that Northern Northampton, or Southern Northampton?add a temporary backstop at Northampton
What do you think the efl can do?Not going to make any difference & not even going to generate much publicity.
Cunningham & Colleen Fletcher would be better employed getting a statement out of the EFL on which they can comment publicly.
What do you think the efl can do?
To see if there are other options to help save ccfc or fishing for information for wasps?There has been speculation the EFL will prevent CCFC playing next seasonif they can't play in Coventry.
This is not going to happen in my opinion, I don't think they have sufficient control to do that.
I think it is worthwhile that the MPs find out what options are on the table as far as the EFL are concerned.
I agree, if he had a semblance of a suggestion it may be beneficial but the reality is he doesn't have a dog in the fight.It would help if he said what action he wanted them to take.
What does he want them to do?
I do question the legitimacy of a statement like this. Surely Cunningham knows that in reality little can be done to resolve our plight with governmental intervention so what purpose does he have for speaking to the press? It seems to me he just wants to put his head above the parfait and paint a portrait of himself of being 'an MR that cares'. Maybe I'm being sceptical but bizarre to be coming out with it now.
Not much older than Geoffrey Robinson was at the last election!Surely the last hurrah, he will be 80 come the next election, he can't possibly stand again?
Jim Cunningham said:This football club is part of our fabric as a city and as we enter 2019 as the European City of Sport, it would be unforgivable for the Government to stand idlily by and let our football club leave our city or worse, collapse altogether.
...
This cannot continue. We must ensure the home of Coventry City Football Club remains in Coventry.
Anyone actually disagree with what he's said...?
Ensure Coventry City remain in Coventry.It's not disagreeing with it, it's more asking what he wants them to do when calling on them.
He may be singing the right hymn but not sure what good it's going to do. Truth is politics and government both National and Local has never been such a shambles. Dominated by self interested, nest lining, expense fiddling, pension amassing vultures. No one trusts any of them any more do they ?
Ensure Coventry City remain in Coventry.
That's what we all want, right? So therefore it's a message we should be getting behind so everyone says it, right?
That's not really the point, is it.Yes but how are the people he is sending the message to able to do that?
That's not really the point, is it.
For how long have we complained that nobody sends a single message we can all get behind, that Coventry City should remain in Coventry?
For how long has it been criticised that there is too much partiality, and no re-iteration of this simple message?
For how long have we asked for the profile of this to be raised?
And then, when someone with a public profile, asserts exactly that, we decide to try and break it down, run it down, or look for holes.
As opposed to getting behind a unified message and raising it still further.
We're fucking doomed.
Alternatively, you start with the simple, unifying message and, once you get people behind it, you then sort out the detail.Yeah but it would help if he says what they could do and how they should help.
The more I think about this the more I wonder if someone is pulling his strings to create a distraction.
Absolutely agree with the sentiment but I'm not sure what asking the culture secretary to arrange a meeting of Coventry and Warwickshire MPs, which surely he could do himself anyway, is really going to help.
He's a labour MP and we have a labour council who stated that Wasps ownership would not impact the football club, maybe that is where he should be targeting. Would expect him to have more influence there and while the council can't directly solve the situation they undoubtedly have influence over those that can.
Alternatively, you start with the simple, unifying message and, once you get people behind it, you then sort out the detail.
Or... you argue over the detail, get nobody behind the core message, as a result everybody thinks nobody cares if the club remains in Coventry, and it goes tits up.