Flaura and Fauna on that siteWhat is the due diligence you have to do over the purchase of a plot of land? Isn't it just the land searches usually done by solicitors and approaching the planning authorities? There might of course be a land audit to see if land is suitable and to be carried out by buyer but what else is due diligence? Arent the removal or settlement of charges over the property usually the problem of the vendor and settled out of the proceeds? What other due diligence is there? Just curious.
Every time I read something about this 'new stadium' I am oversome with the urge to punch the nearest person in the face. Which can be problematic if I'm watching Peppa Pig with my youngest daughter.
Fuck off Fisher/Sepalla, you lying pieces of shit, so that we can bring our club home.
What is the due diligence you have to do over the purchase of a plot of land? Isn't it just the land searches usually done by solicitors and approaching the planning authorities? There might of course be a land audit to see if land is suitable and to be carried out by buyer? How long would that take ? Arent the removal or settlement of charges over the property usually the problem of the vendor and settled out of the proceeds? What other due diligence is there? Just curious.
Every time I read something about this 'new stadium' I am oversome with the urge to punch the nearest person in the face. Which can be problematic if I'm watching Peppa Pig with my youngest daughter.
Fuck off Fisher/Sepalla, you lying pieces of shit, so that we can bring our club home.
maybe they are also buying the Brandon Bees.
Anyone else get the impression Les Reid is suspicious about whether Sisu will build a new stadium? He's now doing what Footy Law blog did this summer and asking neighbouring authorities whether they've been approached.
The article says:
"Last month, Rugby Borough Council maintained it had still received no approach from any party acting for Coventry City interested in buying the Brandon site.
"The Telegraph has today asked all borough and district councils in Warwickshire bordering Coventry’s administrative boundary whether any approach has been made, for planning or any other purpose."
Not sure if this is new information. It certainly does not prove they are doing anything.
And yes that blog did a piece along the same lines. They however do not have the access that Mr Reid enjoys with the sources.
Lets take them at their word, for now. Though it might be worth checking the information provided by CBRE.
"The Telegraph has today asked all borough and district councils in Warwickshire bordering Coventry’s administrative boundary whether any approach has been made, for planning or any other purpose."
That's good investigatory journalism, don't just take their word for it check. The last time this was asked by people other then the Telegraph it came back as a No. I wonder what the answers will be this time as it is suggested:-
"It [CBRE] claims it remains the case that the relevant council had been approached for two of those four sites."
So this time there is a good chance that it will be a yes response. They are Councils after all are subject to the FOI Act. So the responses should be newsworthy when all the Councils are asked that have authority over:-
"sites within six miles of the city centre, as measured by Coventry Council House."
The evidence of them doing something must be out there. I await the information and not just the suggestion.
Not sure if this is new information. It certainly does not prove they are doing anything.
And yes that blog did a piece along the same lines. They however do not have the access that Mr Reid enjoys with the sources.
Lets take them at their word, for now. Though it might be worth checking the information provided by CBRE.
"The Telegraph has today asked all borough and district councils in Warwickshire bordering Coventry’s administrative boundary whether any approach has been made, for planning or any other purpose."
That's good investigatory journalism, don't just take their word for it check. The last time this was asked by people other then the Telegraph it came back as a No. I wonder what the answers will be this time as it is suggested:-
"It [CBRE] claims it remains the case that the relevant council had been approached for two of those four sites."
So this time there is a good chance that it will be a yes response. They are Councils after all are subject to the FOI Act. So the responses should be newsworthy when all the Councils are asked that have authority over:-
"sites within six miles of the city centre, as measured by Coventry Council House."
The evidence of them doing something must be out there. I await the information and not just the suggestion.
Hasn't the FOI request of neighbouring councils been done already? Was it by the guy who's article incensed Our Les and led to his Twitter tirade? The feedback returned was that nobody had heard of Fisher and or his representatives. Make of that what you will
Very interesting how LR has punctuated the article with information on what the CT had done in the past on this subject
Problems with Brandon:
Contested ownership and unpaid tax
Road infrastructure
Rugby council resistance to development
Listed buildings
Residents are anti development
Actually it seems right up SISU's street?
Hasn't the FOI request of neighbouring councils been done already? Was it by the guy who's article incensed Our Les and led to his Twitter tirade? The feedback returned was that nobody had heard of Fisher and or his representatives. Make of that what you will
The information held by the Councils will change with time. What dates did the original request go in? I am unsure, but was the original requests done before SISU appointed CBRE to act on their behalf? It is highly likely that information could change between the Councils responding to that FOI and the new Telegraph led request, As people make approaches all year round. The councils also have no duty to contact previous FOI Askers to update their requests.
The only way to check is to ask again.
As CBRE are claiming they have done it, the councils might respond in a different way. If they all still say no, then the conclusion we can draw is that they are not as far along the new stadium route as they are claiming they are. Make of that what you will.
If they were 100% comitted to Fish faces plan A then they wouldnt still be trying to derail the 14m loan agreement between CCC and ACL.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?