skybluelee
Well-Known Member
The old me would have bitten.
Who the feck gives a shit about your frustration?
Our club is almost dead and you're typing apologies!
Get a kit!
Or the going on TV calling for the club to go into admin as it would get rid of SISU and we would live happily ever after..
Which would have happened if SISU had not moved the players into holdings. Or possibly if the administrator had investigated the facts 'before' administration.
I warmed to it seeing it in action, but I'm still not fussed. The retro one from two seasons ago has set the bar too high now I think.
Am I right in saying they are selling it without the sponsor on? Sure I saw some people who were wearing it yesterday and didn't see the sponsor
Just ordering one for the kid for Christmas.
You didn't know this?
Not One Promotion More
No I didn't. If they are selling it with no sponsor they may as well sell it with no sleeves in my opinion.
you have hit a low point when covcity4life thinks you are immature.
Does anyone know what time the new kit's going on sale on Sunday ?
Do you remember a time with Football Shirts with no sponsors on them?
That is not my point. When the sponsor is a charity, surely to get the best "charity" for said charity you need to get people noticing it. Not putting it on the supporter's shirt is crap if you ask me.
But the contract is only for 3 months!!
No, they are continuing to sponsor the charity.
As it is a temporary thing, they wouldn't put it on the shirt as it would be out of date in 3 months.
But it is a charity ............ how can you not see my point??
I would rather have a charity on my shirt, than CBRE or any money-making business for that. Personal Opinion.
Which is fair enough. Having a charity on the front would be chartiable and for the specific cause, however as Nick and Willie have pointed out, what the point in printing all the new shirts with a sponsor that will not be in date in three months?
Are you getting a new home shirt by the way?
Is it not the case that they have released a specific number of shirts now, prior to them releasing more shirts at christmas? Are the next batch going to have the proper sponsor on or be sponsor-less as well?
If the shirt had the charity on would it have stopped you buying one? Or would you buy one and then when the new sponsor is out would you buy another one?
I just personally think this batch of shirts should have had the charity on. Even if they gave you the option it would have been better.
No I am not. I would if they had the charity on and said £5 from each shirt goes to the charity.
Thing is I don't have a problem with people buying it. but honestly it will be out of date at Xmas because that is when the charity sponsorship finishes then you have to get the new one?
tynan scope said on fridays sky blue interactive that the sponsor is available to be printed onto the shirt. it will cost £5 and every penny from that will go to the charity, which is fair enough.
If that is the case:
1. Why are they not promoting this?
2. I still think they should sell the shirts at £35 with £5 going to the charity. By selling the shirts at £35 and offering the extra printing for £5 which goes to charity it suggests they are not prepared to take a hit on their own profits. If they offered it at £35 with £5 going to the charity, and optional sponsorship printing for free then I would buy one. In fact I would buy 2 as I would love to get my daughter one.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?