You then need to deduct its liabilities. That's a net deficit of more than £30m.
Ltes face it, we didnt have a queue of rich suitors when the
club was up for sale previously so why would this change all of a sudden now? No-one in their right minds will come and save this club with the current debts, uncertainty and policitical shit that is going on. If they do they need their heads testing!
Further to this, it is likely that anyone who would purchase the club would face exactly the same issues as our current owners including financial constraints and no ground to play at. I think people think there are arab billionaires waiting to buy clubs every week. If there are, we are not going to be top of their list sadly!
The only realistic way out for SISU is to accept an offer in the region of £10-£20 million for the club, which would then include the write off off all debt to SISU and its related parties.
In this case SISU would have made a loss of the value of the debt less the consideration for the club, but this has to be better than the alternative which is to provide funds to the club to continue running without any foreseeable profit, and certainly nowhere near recouping their total investment.
The new owner would be in a position to take the club forward with very little external debt (probably only standard operating debts), and the ability to open fresh talks with ACL with a view to returning to the RICOH. With the right owner on board and a good relationship formed with the council and higgs, a future purchase of ACL to combine club and stadium wouldnt be too unfeasible.
The main stopping point is that SISU are being stubborn in the extreme and seem to want to continue chasing losses whilst alienating all other associated stakeholders. There are almost certainly parties interesting in buying out the club and for the amounts stated but they will not make an approach until SISU can be seen to actively want an exit. Until then SISU will want to play hardball and insist of a full payoff of their debt, which will quite rightly not be met by anybody.
Not really, SISU/ARVO have to write the liabilities off and accept a fraction of that amount, e.g. £5M or so.
They started at CCFC with about £12M investment for a Championship Club.. now they have £45/50M debt and a homeless league one club, it is their mess and they have to pay for it,
Why should anyone else pay for their mismanagement over nearly 7 years.
Great post Jim. I do agree.
It seems we're caught by owners that can't sell and therefore buyer's can't buy at a realistic price. Would you pay £10m-£20m for a business with a deficit of more than £30m?
I don't know the endgame here. Something tells me that SISU are in 'shit or bust' mode. I'm not sure it's the right strategy when they have been 'alienating all other associated stakeholders,' to borrow your phrase.
So your saying nobody but Sisu bidded for ccfc during the recent administration process ?
what i was saying was there isnt going to be anyone who is willing to throw bucketloads of cash at us.
So your saying nobody but Sisu bidded for ccfc during the recent administration process ?
Don't get me wrong we all want a rich Arab to come walking through the door with the Ricoh as his first purchase
This is an interesting point and one that probably needs its own thread. Even in a best case scenario where we started under new owners with zero debt and back at the Ricoh with access to all revenues without running at a loss how do you remain competitive? Look at Pompey this year, they have the FL over their shoulder making sure they don't spend more than they have coming in and despite the biggest crowds in the division, and you'd assume therefore the highest revenue, they are struggling to stay in the league. Not sure that FFP, unless it's tightened and enforced strictly, is going to resolve that issue so owners of clubs will always need to be prepared to lose money.
I don't particularly.
Especially not if he's walking hand in hand with Joe Elliott.
This is an interesting point and one that probably needs its own thread. Even in a best case scenario where we started under new owners with zero debt and back at the Ricoh with access to all revenues without running at a loss how do you remain competitive? Look at Pompey this year, they have the FL over their shoulder making sure they don't spend more than they have coming in and despite the biggest crowds in the division, and you'd assume therefore the highest revenue, they are struggling to stay in the league. Not sure that FFP, unless it's tightened and enforced strictly, is going to resolve that issue so owners of clubs will always need to be prepared to lose money.
Th huge fuck off list of former players they're still having to pay doesn't help Pompey move forward.
I get what point your trying to make Dave, but I don't think Pompey are a great example, the saying "Quality over Quantity" springs to mind when I think of Pompey this season.
Th huge fuck off list of former players they're still having to pay doesn't help Pompey move forward.
How do you know it's a bargain? Have you done due diligence on their books?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
You may want to dance around your handbags on the other thread with he said she said !
The facts that are relevant to ccfc supporters.
1) Sisu can't do a deal for the Ricoh.
2) Playing outside Coventry in front of 10% of fans.
3) 40million + In debt with nothing to show for it.
4) Paying fees and interest on debt of between 1-2 million a year which is unsustainable at sixfields.
5) Sisu can't deliver new stadium in Coventry.
Once you accept these facts then the only conclusion for all ccfc supporters is for Sisu to be replaced with owners who can deliver the basics required.
I've added one for you
6) No new owners would now want to deal with a council who have been shown to conspire against the tenants at the Arena
Living in hope.
But at least they invested in the team
Its obvious to me now that the only way CCFC can move forward now is with new owners.
Sisu had the opportunity to buy into the Ricoh but blew it with their tactics.
Why are Sisu fighting for the Ricoh when they deem the Higgs, Acl and the freehold all worthless ?
Its Sisu's fault the way things have turned out and all these court actions are just sour grapes.
I see comments on here with some of you saying hopefully they can do a deal now. Do you really think thay can happen ?
I can't believe that some fans who frequent this forum, were in uproar that a Council member had not told Sisu they were paying off the loan. But happily except Joy and Tim Fisher threatening to liquidate CCFC at every turn !!!!
To much has gone on now for a deal to ever happen so new owners are required to move CCFC foward. The longer Sisu are at the helm the longer our club stays in limbo !!!
I find it pathetic that any one of you want anything other than SISU gone and new owners. This club has huge potential and very loyal fans who have been through so much disappointment and crap over the years.
People seem to accept the current situation as if it isn't of SISU's making.
They are utter immoral, corrupt, inept clowns. That isn't up for debate - it's a fact.
Owners holding a club hostage? It simply doesn't fucking happen anywhere else. Why aren't people more willing to form a breakaway club?
What happens when they liquidate? Will there still be certain posters on here backing that decision? I'm sure there will; and I'm sure they aren't real supporters.
We all know who they are.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is no way these guys will go without any Wonga! so we are damn well stuck in Limbo if they lose the JRHear hear Rich.
Except for breakaway club that would have to be last resort.
I'm expecting Sisu to be laughed out of court at the JR !!
Then when they lose an appeal they will fuck off from our club eventually.
We are probably looking at another 12-18 months of pain though. Give or take a month depending on how long it takes the not so bright sixfields posse to wise up to them !!
Owners holding a club hostage? It simply doesn't fucking happen anywhere else. Why aren't people more willing to form a breakaway club?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?