Transfer Rumour New signing pending - Rabbi Matondo (236 Viewers)

GIMOC

Well-Known Member
The loaning club would have had to agree the terms so we’d know that before he showed up at Ryton

what about the part where we have option to buy. how does that work?

some of you on here really obsessed with info I get
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I said the meeting didn’t go well then told he’s on 30k a week

maybe we don’t want him here because the 30k could be spent elsewhere

Maybe Lampard didn’t like him as a person

who knows

The club would know what he’s being paid and would have agreed terms with Rangers
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
It might be the wages for when he gets a permanent move not the loan

Might end up being just a loan for now. No option to buy. Who knows
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Maybe frank got wind of his 400 injuries in 6 seasons

Season 2 Shrug GIF by The Office
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
That's the point, he's clearly a target but it's the wages thing that people are laughing at, especially as you claim the same about Schlupp now as well
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
To be fair, I've seen other sources online saying he was in coventry today .

If he indeed doesn't sign , something has ofcourse happened I don't know why GIMOC is getting so much flak on this one tbh

Not giving GIMOC flack. I’m believe in GIMOC like GIMOC believes in chemtrails (mostly out of faith and a desire to be contrary but also maybe know something others don’t)
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
It’s more likely lampard met him, didn’t like his character and thought his personality wouldn’t fit the dressing room
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
But as has been said , main media outlets reporting he is in cov

it will be nothing to do with wages if he doesn’t sign
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
it will be nothing to do with wages if he doesn’t sign

I have to ask if it's a loan to perm when do they discuss the topic of his wages upon the permanent move?

Is it entirely not possible that rangers agreed ro a loan to buy but the player and his agent needed to meet the club to negotiate wages ?

I can't pretend to be a transfer guru
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Live by the sword. If you can’t expect shit, when your pending signing was in fact a far bit off and has now been turned down, don’t post it.

I’ve posted some shite I was given and got rightly laughed at.

Well in fairness , sky sports news have been reporting it
 

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
I have to ask if it's a loan to perm when do they discuss the topic of his wages upon the permanent move?

Is it entirely not possible that rangers agreed ro a loan to buy but the player hand his agent needed to meet the club to negotiate wages ?

I can't pretend to be a transfer guru
We wouldn’t discuss permanent terms yet, as it’s not an obligation to buy but an option. At most we might discuss the barebones
 

larry_david

Well-Known Member
It feels like if gimoc breaks the news,generally it doesn't happen. Either that's wages break down, generally personalities of player and management don't click, or Sakamotos life threatening may not be able to walk again hip injury turns out it wasn't life changing after all

But generally doesn't happen. It's odd
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I have to ask if it's a loan to perm when do they discuss the topic of his wages upon the permanent move?

Is it entirely not possible that rangers agreed ro a loan to buy but the player hand his agent needed to meet the club to negotiate wages ?

I can't pretend to be a transfer guru

They’d also have agreed the fee and we’d have known what his wage demands are going forward
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top