D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
You're on the wrong board, then!but I don’t appreciate being taken for a prick TBH.
Anyway, this whole thing is quite simple really.While there might have been a case for the first JR, nobody has ever been able to explain why the city council, after noting the litigious nature of SISU, would sell the stadium without eleventy billion lawyers checking that the deal followed the rules.
What we see is exactly what it was, a stalling exercise to tie up funds, sow doubt in the minds of sponsors, and cause expense and disruption.
Now, I don't mind Wasps going bust, but let's at least see it for what it is and was, and not pretend there was anything else behind this particular avenue of complaint.
And just think how much further down the line in resolving our own long-term future we'd have been without all this inane vindictive distraction.
Last edited by a moderator: