skyblueeyesrevisited
Well-Known Member
Is Mr Panda a pseudonym for Nostradamus?
Is Mr Panda a pseudonym for Nostradamus?Mr panda said he’s going Lincoln
Is Mr Panda a pseudonym for Nostradamus?
Shots?Robins wants 3 more
Mr panda said he’s going Lincoln
So do we Mark. Get them in.Robins wants 3 more
Having the previous day saying he was coming here
Maybe 2 strikers and a number 10?So do we Mark. Get them in.
If we’re planning on a midfield 3 we need more in that area.Maybe 2 strikers and a number 10?
It was only two he wanted before. Now with Bayliss going it's gone up to 3.He's been saying he wants 3 more for weeks and weeks
Sent from my ELE-L29 using Tapatalk
Having the previous day saying he was coming here
It was only two he wanted before. Now with Bayliss going it's gone up to 3.
Give up mate. Things change
Robins also said we wouldn't sell Chaplin without having an immediate replacement ready to come inI feel more reassured having read MR's comments about future incomings. Nicer when they're across the line, though.
Do you think they’ve tried?Robins also said we wouldn't sell Chaplin without having an immediate replacement ready to come in
Do you think they’ve tried?
I think they've failed.Do you think they’ve tried?
Yep I agree but I don’t think he misspokeI think they've failed.
Sounds like there was an agreement in placeThat's alright then, immediate replacement means an agreement with a player in principle. Not a vague target who others might covet.
Sounds like there was an agreement in place
Allen, Jobello, Kastaneer, Pask, Rose, Dabo etc, etc....There clearly wasn't, otherwise he'd have signed here. It is bollocks.
We've sold two young players who were our players and accruing value and are going to replace them with one permanent player and another couple of loans. This is going backwards, where are the foundations on which to try and progress?
There clearly wasn't, otherwise he'd have signed here. It is bollocks.
We've sold two young players who were our players and accruing value and are going to replace them with one permanent player and another couple of loans. This is going backwards, where are the foundations on which to try and progress?
We’ve also lost loan players in Sterling and Thomas and gained Dabo and Jobello permanently. It’s swings and roundabouts.
That's alright then, immediate replacement means an agreement with a player in principle. Not a vague target who others might covet.
He’s probably behind Westbrooke and Eccles isn’t he?Is Burroughs ready to step in maybe bayliss departure helps his progression?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Allen, Jobello, Kastaneer, Pask, Rose, Dabo etc, etc....
You asked where are the foundations, they are in the players we've signed on mainly 3 year contracts.It implies they're additions rather than replacements for all of these who have left since January:
Grimmer, Willis, Burge, Chaplin, Clarke Harris, Ogogo, Bayliss
It's called being a realist. Panda chats as much sense as that clown ccfc4lifeDon’t know whether to admire your unadulterated scepticism or be irritated by it.
blah blah blah, keep digging.......We did have some kind of agreement with Walker, that's why I knew about it so early on. It just clearly wasn't a gentlemans agreement!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?