olderskyblue
Well-Known Member
He can now….Not sure Maddison can play left back
He can now….Not sure Maddison can play left back
Well he will score the teams he plays in are all set up to feed him to the detriment of the team. Spurs we’re flying when he left it’s a shame the got so many injuries. England would be a far better team without him in it.While scoring 40 plus goals , the man who made Bayern worse was Tuchel.
I was surprised Southgate didn't sign Maatsen in the January window.Perhaps he should have not played most of the season like Shaw! Don't get it!
Has he thrown a tantrum and stormed out of the camp? Weird that he’s the only player named and he’s left so early.
Has he thrown a tantrum and stormed out of the camp? Weird that he’s the only player named and he’s left so early.
Last place he would want to be seeing all his mates get in and you are getting cut and a waste of his time hanging aroundHas he thrown a tantrum and stormed out of the camp? Weird that he’s the only player named and he’s left so early.
So you think maddison gets in ahead of palmer foden and Bellingham? Why waste the place. You mention options then dismiss someone who can play in more than 1 position.
Or Eze, who’s ended the season strongly and can cover both wings.So you think maddison gets in ahead of palmer foden and Bellingham? Why waste the place. You mention options then dismiss someone who can play in more than 1 position.
How certain were you about Maguire and Grealish?No, but justify why the likes of Shaw, Maguire and Grealish are almost certain to be on the plane.
They've either shown no form or simply not shown this season. Maguire, apart from his goal was bang average in the semi and was only in the team because they had an injury crisis, Shaw is a crock and Grealish hardly played for Manx Shitty towards the final third of the season.
There are/is more than very capable alternatives for each of those players.
It's a fact that we have a glut of talented midfielders and it's unfortunate that Maddison is the one that's misses out but I'm biased because he's a Cov kid like us all and I can't see further than that
Clearly I wasn't, but then I don't claim to be ITK.How certain were you about Maguire and Grealish?
Im surprised Dunk is in the squad , had an average season , so slow and coming up to 34.Bbc
Clearly I wasn't, but then I don't claim to be ITK.
My assumption was based on knowing absolutely nothing about anything.
He's also behind Saka, Gordon and Eze. I think he's capable of being at least as good as the latter two but not on current form, so I don't see how Southall could possibly have included him.Maddison is behind Bellingham , Foden and Palmer. They all had better seasons, not taking him is the correct call
Dunk is about as mobile as an oil tanker.Maddison has been unlucky with injury and form since his return. Based on the first three months of the season, he would be ahead of Palmer in the pecking order.
The only decision I really disagree with is Dunk over Branthwaite. I do realise that if Stones gets injured/suspended then we lack experience but Branthwaite still looks more solid than Dunk. More mobile and had a better season too.
I dunno, you can get them to turn a bitDunk is about as mobile as an oil tanker.
May as well because the defence is crapDo people think we should just pick a squad of 26 attacking players?
Never mind Iceland, we'd struggle against Lidl and Aldi after a performance like last night.
Agree Ck55 but what do I know other than Jack Shit.I still think that more than any other England midfield player, Maddison can thread a pass through and unlock a tight defence. Foden and Bellingham are excellent players, but I don’t think they have that ability to the same extent as Maddison. I’d have taken him, even before last night.