no home ground found?? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter intercity
- Start date
WillieStanley
New Member
Crisis talks with ACL and once again the council have CCFC right where they want them.
Danceswithhorses
Well-Known Member
Or the alternative view....the council rescue ccfc AGAIN, because of the incompetence of the club's owners.
Leamington Pete
Well-Known Member
This could be another question for Mr Fisher. We' re talking to three identified possible venues but have any actually said they would actually have us? I'm guessing no.
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
i agree DWH. really don't get this aggression to CCC (as far as ccfc is concerned
)
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Because they couldn't get the Ricoh on the cheap just goes to show what kind of company SISU really is cheap and nasty
:blue: doing
:blue: doing
i agree DWH. really don't get this aggression to CCC (as far as ccfc is concerned
I would rather it be "The American" lots of issues regarding
Human Rights in the far east, would hate to be owned by a bunch of "Despots"...Having said that..???????
Otis
Well-Known Member
I've just booked a ticket on this in case it is actually a trip to one of City's home games.
http://www.harryshaw.co.uk/itineraries/2465-mystery-afternoon-tour?currentpage=4&areafilter=
http://www.harryshaw.co.uk/itineraries/2465-mystery-afternoon-tour?currentpage=4&areafilter=
Ashdown what do you think the alternative is?i cant get my head round no skyblues man
Otis
Well-Known Member
What's confusing me a tad is this assertion that the FL have dictated the 3 grounds for the groundshare.
Do I take it by this then that the FL have cleared it with the 3 clubs in question?
Surely the FA can't just dictate to these clubs and tell them that they have to allow a club to groundshare with them just like that. The clubs have to be onboard. There would have to be negotiation. So in assuming this, the 3 West Midlands clubs must have already said yes.
But then if they have already said yes then surely Sisu know exactly how much the rent is going to be etc. etc.
It's all a bit confusing. Would have thought that what should happen is that the FL suggest and recommend clubs to share with rather than dictate where exactly a club must go.
All negotiating about the share and rent and logistics would have had to been agreed in principal between the FL and the clubs in question wouldn't it?
Do I take it by this then that the FL have cleared it with the 3 clubs in question?
Surely the FA can't just dictate to these clubs and tell them that they have to allow a club to groundshare with them just like that. The clubs have to be onboard. There would have to be negotiation. So in assuming this, the 3 West Midlands clubs must have already said yes.
But then if they have already said yes then surely Sisu know exactly how much the rent is going to be etc. etc.
It's all a bit confusing. Would have thought that what should happen is that the FL suggest and recommend clubs to share with rather than dictate where exactly a club must go.
All negotiating about the share and rent and logistics would have had to been agreed in principal between the FL and the clubs in question wouldn't it?
Bluegloucester
New Member
More BS from FisherWhat's confusing me a tad is this assertion that the FL have dictated the 3 grounds for the groundshare.
Do I take it by this then that the FL have cleared it with the 3 clubs in question?
Surely the FA can't just dictate to these clubs and tell them that they have to allow a club to groundshare with them just like that. The clubs have to be onboard. There would have to be negotiation. So in assuming this, the 3 West Midlands clubs must have already said yes.
But then if they have already said yes then surely Sisu know exactly how much the rent is going to be etc. etc.
It's all a bit confusing. Would have thought that what should happen is that the FL suggest and recommend clubs to share with rather than dictate where exactly a club must go.
All negotiating about the share and rent and logistics would have had to been agreed in principal between the FL and the clubs in question wouldn't it?
