His thinking...‘I need a tough tackling, no nonsense LWB...good job I have Shippers up my sleeve’.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Shipley used to be a left back, so I guess it makes sense if Robins wants to keep Dacosta on the right.
How many times have I told you to keep out of my garden!!Bizarrely feeling very confident of a win.... I’ve no idea why but everything seems great since eating those mushrooms I foraged for my morning fry up.
No, he scored in Saturday.I thought Cantwell had gone to West Brom?
It certainly looks probable that Shipley will start as LWB but given the stamina and physical attributes needed for that role I would expect him to be out on his feet by half time, so we definitely need a back up plan. For the sake of the balance of the team I would rather not see Da Costa moved there, but rather include Newton on the bench and bring him on if needed. Not ideal, as given that MR has brought Reid it suggests he doesn't rate Newton that highly, but I see it as the least worse option available to us.
Just because we've brought a second LWB into the club doesn't necessarily mean he doesn't see a future for Newton, who isn't long back from injury. It's a position we're light at within the club and we now have 2 development prospects. Both could make it or neither could make it.
is Reid injured?
Can't see us getting anything here, especially without a recognised left back (great squad planning that).
I’d take a performanceI’m going to sound like a broken record but I’d take a point
We should rest Shipley for the big push next seasonYep. Suspect that's why Shipley came on there against Cardiff. Slight concern but it might actually suit him.
Playing DaCosta at left back would pretty much nullify his natural attacking threat.I'm amazed so many have us down to play wingbacks that formation completely plays into Norwich's hands we will be destroyed.
Can't believe MR will be as foolish to play wing backs and play somewhere there who is a square peg in a round hole.
A 4-3-3 compact formation makes sense to me with Hamer, James & Sheaf the midfield 3 to try to combat Norwich's 3 behind Pukki.
I expect Osti to move right Fadz to come in for Hyam and DaCosta to play left back.
I'm amazed so many have us down to play wingbacks that formation completely plays into Norwich's hands we will be destroyed.
Can't believe MR will be as foolish to play wing backs and play somewhere there who is a square peg in a round hole.
I'm amazed so many have us down to play wingbacks that formation completely plays into Norwich's hands we will be destroyed.
Can't believe MR will be as foolish to play wing backs and play somewhere there who is a square peg in a round hole.
A 4-3-3 compact formation makes sense to me with Hamer, James & Sheaf the midfield 3 to try to combat Norwich's 3 behind Pukki.
I expect Osti to move right Fadz to come in for Hyam and DaCosta to play left back.
I take it you didnt look at their forums then!!Well, Giles was recalled. Reid was signed and then injured. Things happen, you can't have 3 players for every position. Norwich had no strikers when we played them earlier this season. I doubt their fans were screaming about "great squad planning".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?