No matter what some claim, the state of the Conservatives at the moment makes it almost inevitable.
They'll be in the self-centred 10% thentaking steps to safeguard their wealth
Far from inevitable. I sense people are already beginning to wake up to the nightmare that would follow a Labour victory and a likely coalition with the SNP.
I agree that the Conservative party are a joke with a feeble, ineffective leader but at the moment the alternative is too awful to contemplate.
I have a feeling that Mr Farage feels his job is not done and may well return to stir things up in the near future. That would go a long way to ensuring Labour never get anywhere near power.
I'm apprehensive about Corbyn and don't understand the cult around him. I have heard some worrying things about Momentum at the local Labour meetings and hate the idea of them trying to deselect excellent local MP, Peter Kyle.
I also feel that a section of his supporters believe that he is actually more pro-remain than they think- I know a Corbynista who he is convinced Corbyn is pro-EU. I believe his views on Europe will ultimately be his downfall, particularly as a majority of members and Labour voters are pro-Europe, especially the young.
Not sure how Farage is going to stop Corbyn's rise though? A problem the Conservatives have is that there is no one to come in and replace May, Johnson is a buffoon and wouldn't last 5 minutes.
I suspect it's partly the caricature of Corbyn as the looney lefty. and then when the manifesto ends up something that other left leaning parties in government run with... this caricature has to continue.The fact the manifesto is regarded as radical shows how far to the right the country has drifted!
The fact the manifesto is regarded as radical shows how far to the right the country has drifted!
Cameron was the most acceptable face of the Tory Party since Major, but he was in no way a Ted Heath, who'd be seen as a loony lefty nowadays!We are nothing like drifting to the right. Cameron and May are hopeless liberals without a conservative bone in their bodies.
Cameron was the most acceptable face of the Tory Party since Major, but he was in no way a Ted Heath, who'd be seen as a loony lefty nowadays!
His wife is a neo-nazi and has a swastika tattooed on her chest. Lovely people.
When listening to the radio I bet your favourite programme is sounds of the 70's
The fact the manifesto is regarded as radical shows how far to the right the country has drifted!
You think how far to the right we have drifted when we have a very central and liberal conservative government is bizarre.
I would love to see what you would say if we had a real conservative right of centre government.
Saw a documentary featuring this Mark Collett fella a few years back. The programme was about the BNP and I'm pretty sure the show concluded with Collett flouncing out of the party because they weren't right wing enough.
Just saying...
I suspect it's partly the caricature of Corbyn as the looney lefty. and then when the manifesto ends up something that other left leaning parties in government run with... this caricature has to continue.
I also like the fact that at least there are positive solutions thought of to solve issues, rather than a culture of blame, hatred, and resentment. Perhaps instead of just repeating strong and stable, and Brexit means Brexit, the Tory Party had come up with some positive solutions, they might have done better.
Or are they so scared by their own default of negativity, that they don't feel able to put solutions forward for fear of this?
I'm apprehensive about Corbyn and don't understand the cult around him. I have heard some worrying things about Momentum at the local Labour meetings and hate the idea of them trying to deselect excellent local MP, Peter Kyle.
I also feel that a section of his supporters believe that he is actually more pro-remain than they think- I know a Corbynista who he is convinced Corbyn is pro-EU. I believe his views on Europe will ultimately be his downfall, particularly as a majority of members and Labour voters are pro-Europe, especially the young.
Not sure how Farage is going to stop Corbyn's rise though? A problem the Conservatives have is that there is no one to come in and replace May, Johnson is a buffoon and wouldn't last 5 minutes.
For the second day, militants attempted to disrupt the Tory conference. At one stage a group disrupted a meeting being held by Rees-Mogg, shouting and waving banners. I don't believe that any Tories did the same to Labour's conference last week, but moving on, here is some footage of a protester challenging RM:
I decided to check his assertions:
1) "People are dying because of Tory policies." I can find no evidence of this.
2) "A million people depend on food banks." As already discussed, nobody depends on food banks - they are there on an exceptional basis for emergencies. In fact there were 1.1 million hand outs in the last year. As, people can return several times over a year, it seems extremely unlikely that a million people are using them.
UK foodbank use continues to rise
3) "We are the only advanced economy with depreciating wages". Not true on any level. UK wages are not depreciating
United Kingdom Average Weekly Earnings Growth | 2001-2017 | Data | Chart
and they are appreciating faster than France (for example):
France Monthly Wages Growth QoQ | 1999-2017 | Data | Chart | Calendar
4) "That's a categorical lie [that employment is the best way out of poverty]". I don't know where to start. If employment isn't the best way out of poverty then what is? Unemployment?
This kind of hyper-emotional rhetoric is being bandied about all over the place by similar people. It just doesn't stand up to scrutiny. If the only objections are not true, could it be that their opinions are built upon the sand?
Unless you missed it, and it would be easy to do so due to how inept they are, the Conservatives are the party of government. It is for that reason that protests tend to happen at their conference rather than the Labour one.
Where have you looked for the evidence of people dying due to Tory policies? The Daily Telegraph?
If somebody needs to use a foodbank at any point, they have a degree of dependency on them. If a million people have used foodbanks, a million people have been dependent on them not necessarily simultaneously.
Why have you produced a earnings growth chart from 2001 - 2007? Labour were in power at that point.
One should also consider wealth per capita, as it's not great to have no inequality but low income. This shows wealth per capita for OECD countries. Again the UK comes out well - higher than Germany & France. The UK is a wonderful place to live - we should count ourselves fortunate.
List of countries by financial assets per capita - Wikipedia
One should also consider wealth per capita, as it's not great to have no inequality but low income. This shows wealth per capita for OECD countries. Again the UK comes out well - higher than Germany & France. The UK is a wonderful place to live - we should count ourselves fortunate.
List of countries by financial assets per capita - Wikipedia
Considering Britain has more billionaires than ever before with an increasing share of the country's wealth, the assets per capita tells you very little about the average working man or woman.
What tells you a lot more is stories like this: Subscribe to read
I haven't found any evidence anywhere. Find some and prove me wrong.
Extremely unlikely that 1 million people have used them at all, if the total number of times used is only just greater than 1 million. 'Depend upon' implies constant use and that of course isn't the case. Had he said "There were 1 million food bank visits last year" it would have been accurate - but then that doesn't sound so good does it?
The charts are to 2017, not 2007.
"There were 1 million food bank visits last year" it would have been accurate - but then that doesn't sound so good does it?
Hmmm. My employers might be upset if I listened to said video but, if that is solely what he said, then he is of course wrong... and mad."That's a categorical lie [that employment is the best way out of poverty]"
Hmmm. My employers might be upset if I listened to said video but, if that is solely what he said, then he is of course wrong... and mad.
It would be valuable to differentiate between *types* of employment however, some of which don't help get people out of poverty. As a soundbyte it's... tenuous, but expanding there's a very real debate to be had about the quality of employment contracts.
As for earnings, the link you gave says that "Adjusted for price inflation, average weekly earnings including bonuses fell 0.4 percent, following a 0.5 percent decrease in the previous period and marking the fourth straight drop. Excluding bonuses, real earnings went down 0.4 percent, the fifth consecutive decline."
So he's not wrong about wages going down.
It is for that reason that protests tend to happen at their conference rather than the Labour one.
Are you aware of any incident, ever, whilst Labour were in power or not, where Conservative supporters disrupted their conference? Either with marches, invading rooms and shouting, or in any other manner?
And yet, I believe this happens at Tory conferences every year. I recall last year that eggs were thrown and people spat at delegates. If the love for Labour is to wane, I believe this is how it could happen: reasonable people realising how unreasonable and aggressive these militants are. Also of course, the economy may finally become much more healthy over the coming 4.5 years.
Is it likely to become much more healthy with the uncertainty caused by Brexit and a possible Tory coup led by someone like BoJo or Gove?
It has zero to do with Brexit you clown.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?