Briles
Well-Known Member
Do undisclosed fees have to be declared on end of year financial reports?
Trouble is us fans won’t be told the true price he goes for,if he goes. Hope he doesn’t but fee will be undisclosed again
He’s not gonna tell fans shit, was my point. You don’t have to stop asking them though.
Do undisclosed fees have to be declared on end of year financial reports?
That alien headed c**t can pay up extra now for his amateur twat comments in the press
One of the most successful chairmen we've hadWe’ve made progress then under Fisher as well so I assume we should equally praise him?
You get a like for alluding to the size and shape of his bonce, it shouldn't have taken the forum this long. I have to share some of the blame.
Robins sounds pissed off about it. It also sounds like he's our player for the next few 'weeks' suggesting Burnley unlikely to meet our valuation and Kompany talking of our player as though there was almost a deal done. if they don't meet the valuation, thought to be around 10m then he stays.
Losing your best player for say 5m to a rival is just not on, so i imagine the fee we are looking for is 10m or there abouts. have Burnley got it? Apparently no.
He could want to wait for other offers but Boddy wants one gone he will sell to the first vaguely acceptable bid
Why do people keep going on about undisclosed transfer fees?
It's not exclusive to SISU
It's not exclusive to CCFC
If you look on the BBC Transfers page, most deals are free or undisclosed.
It's usually only deals involving Premier league clubs where a fee is quoted, and then I would bet it's not so much disclosed as sniffed out by journalists who can't be arsed to do the same for EFL clubs because nobody else cares.
And even if we sold a player for 10 million it's unlikely we would receive 10M upfront so you wouldn't see 10M in the published accounts.
He doesn't have to accept a contract. He's well within his right to turn down any offer. Contracts work both ways.
If we get what money we need Boddy will force him out the club no question
Yea, and rightly so. If it’s for the benefit of the club. What a ridiculous statement.
Club won’t benefit, SISU will.Yea, and rightly so. If it’s for the benefit of the club. What a ridiculous statement.
That’s okay if Robins gets a sizeable chunk to spend on the team but he wonts nowhere near half so it doesn’t really matter if it’s 2 mill, 5 mill or 10 and eveRobins sounds pissed off about it. It also sounds like he's our player for the next few 'weeks' suggesting Burnley unlikely to meet our valuation and Kompany talking of our player as though there was almost a deal done. if they don't meet the valuation, thought to be around 10m then he stays.
Losing your best player for say 5m to a rival is just not on, so i imagine the fee we are looking for is 10m or there abouts. have Burnley got it? Apparently no.
Boddy is a prick lucky to have a good job, pissing arsehole at Worcester City bit more coy here.He could want to wait for other offers but Boddy wants one gone he will sell to the first vaguely acceptable bid
Club won’t benefit, SISU will.
That wouldn’t be difficult.One of the most successful chairmen we've had
The benefit of the club - Jesus Christ
The benefit of the club - Jesus Christ
ExplainIt’s the most pathetic comment I’ve seen by a so called fan
Explain
I was referring to the clown saying we should get rid of o hare and it’s good for the club
That’s okay if Robins gets a sizeable chunk to spend on the team but he wonts nowhere near half so it doesn’t really matter if it’s 2 mill, 5 mill or 10 and eve
Boddy is a prick lucky to have a good job, pissing arsehole at Worcester City bit more coy here.
Another concern though is the sudden emergence of toxic Tim after months with his head down.
It's a pathetic feeWell according to my mate who had a chat with Overson today its £6 million.
Only delay is Burnley want to do it in installments and we want it in full whack.
Oh and not a penny of it is going to Robins for reinvestment
If thats the case, then thats the last 5 years of fan support gone in one move. I for one would stop sticking up for the owners if so
I was referring to the clown saying we should get rid of o hare and it’s good for the club
There are some on here almost obsessed with selling him, players like COH for a club ours has become are immeasurable his ability presence, impetus and fan appeal is immense. AND he loves it here.I was referring to the clown saying we should get rid of o hare and it’s good for the club
It's a pathetic fee
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Well according to my mate who had a chat with Overson today its £6 million.
Only delay is Burnley want to do it in installments and we want it in full whack.
Oh and not a penny of it is going to Robins for reinvestment
If thats the case, then thats the last 5 years of fan support gone in one move. I for one would stop sticking up for the owners if so
Burnley want to do it in instalments because as I said yesterday they are skint and that’s despite raking in a few million selling their better players, they fail to get promotion this season they are bolloxed.Well according to my mate who had a chat with Overson today its £6 million.
Only delay is Burnley want to do it in installments and we want it in full whack.
Oh and not a penny of it is going to Robins for reinvestment
If thats the case, then thats the last 5 years of fan support gone in one move. I for one would stop sticking up for the owners if so
We’ve been through this alreadyBurnley want to do it in instalments because as I said yesterday they are skint and that’s despite raking in a few million selling their better players, they fail to get promotion this season they are bolloxed.
Well according to my mate who had a chat with Overson today its £6 million.
Only delay is Burnley want to do it in installments and we want it in full whack.
Oh and not a penny of it is going to Robins for reinvestment
If thats the case, then thats the last 5 years of fan support gone in one move. I for one would stop sticking up for the owners if so
Lol do you really believe that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?