So where does this all sit with your boddy hatred then ?
As your hatred makes no sense based on what you've just told me
Boddy is the same as fisher with a smiley face - no one likes fisher - where is the difference? Also his track record leaves a train wreck wherever he has been
I don't understand you grendel , one minute you talk about the basket case of a club , having to sell players to survive .. to then hating on the people that have to work under these horrible conditions all whilst maintaining a respectable league position in a tough league.
You're an oddball my friend
No one has to work under any conditions and as I say Boddy has a very dubious history and engages in building a new ground nonsense
We made £2 million in the last accounts on player sales
Well They do else we wouldn't have a club
Don't mix P&L profit/loss with cash flow !!
mmm I thought Tim’s friend would pop up
No one of note but we had transfer income from other sources.Who did we sell last season
No one of note but we had transfer income from other sources.
I'm going to need more than just SBT members word for this one I'm afraid
I think SISU have enough acumen now to start being sensible.Boddy said words to that effect last week when he met the Leamington lot.
His actual words were closer to what Sky Blue Jay said, 'if the price is right, we will sell'.
Don't think that's really jaw dropping news to anyone, it's what gets reinvested which is the main cause of speculation.
Who did we sell last season
You’re desperate for that to be trueI mean the individuals. Boddy doesn’t have to lie about great owner support, the Brentford model, 365 revenues, financial prudence, other clubs like stoke are far worse. A certain mr Johnson is lambasted for lying to his public - he should become our CEO he could tell tall tales all day long and have no recriminations - just good PR, enthusiasm and a jolly face
Sisu can operate in league 1 and league 2
The model does not work in the championship - who says so - a certain Timothy Fisher
We are hearing rumors of no money will not be available to MR, but im starting to think that this is from a player budget meeting. And maybe that the wages out can be reinvested back in, which is where this non investment is coming from.
I would hope and now think they must of been a separate conversation regarding the 3. If any are sold, due to an agreed valuation met between Joy and MR a percentage would then be made available for him to replace.
I think MR is to crafty not to be up to his nuts in this, and the longer this goes on. The more i think MR is really holding a strong hand in this process. Which means, the price is right for him and the club, not solely right for the owners. And if thats the case its a good thing for the fans.
You’re desperate for that to be true
SBB has come on recently and said MR is playing the perfect game re fees and playing things down. Fans need to trust and let the professionals do their thing
SBB hinted we’d be more active in January but the wages would be freed up this summer, given what he usually provides id imagine he’s spot on.SBB has come on recently and said MR is playing the perfect game re fees and playing things down. Fans need to trust and let the professionals do their thing
The no reinvestment thing doesn't make any sense. We've got a recent history of spending a relatively small amount and getting potentially huge returns on that outlay (even taking wages into consideration), why would you cease doing the very thing that makes money.
I could believe that we won't reinvest this summer. If we were unsure which player was leaving, and for how much, it's probably quite challenging to find the right player - if they were even available this summer.
Also every other club knows we'll have money in our pocket, so therefore it's probably wise to publicly and even internally state that the money won't be reinvested.
I mean the individuals. Boddy doesn’t have to lie about great owner support, the Brentford model, 365 revenues, financial prudence, other clubs like stoke are far worse. A certain mr Johnson is lambasted for lying to his public - he should become our CEO he could tell tall tales all day long and have no recriminations - just good PR, enthusiasm and a jolly face
Sisu can operate in league 1 and league 2
The model does not work in the championship - who says so - a certain Timothy Fisher
I mean he’s not wrong, we’ve been successful in the last 5 years in spite of them, not because of them.You are obviously too embarrased to have Robins as your target these days. So you have switched to the owners.
I mean he’s not wrong, we’ve been successful in the last 5 years in spite of them, not because of them.
I mean I’ve cut them slack over the years, but ultimately, they’re not to be trusted.
fisher did once say our model isn’t feasible in the championship. Eventually it’s going to go tits up - and they know it will
I mean he’s not wrong, we’ve been successful in the last 5 years in spite of them, not because of them.
I mean I’ve cut them slack over the years, but ultimately, they’re not to be trusted.
fisher did once say our model isn’t feasible in the championship. Eventually it’s going to go tits up - and they know it will
I don’t disagree, and that’s kind of my point - Robins and Vivaesh have worked miracles with a style of play that’s easy on the eye. I back us to stay up easily.We have one of the best managers outside of the premiership, along with a brilliant coach in Adi Viveash. Even in the worst scenario that the Big 3 were all sold, and no money was available for Robins apart from a loan, I would still back us to stay up comfortably next season.
As much as £500k ??I don’t disagree, and that’s kind of my point - Robins and Vivaesh have worked miracles with a style of play that’s easy on the eye. I back us to stay up easily.
We talk of the Brentford model but they sell players then spend 10m on Ivan Toney.
we’re likely to sell O’Hare for 9m, give Robins 500k at most and say “good luck with that Mark”
Our wage bill alone has increased by 300% in two years
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?