To be fair Forest got nearly £5 million for Samba. 20% of that for Moore? Unlikely but not impossible.
Well exactly-so why the particular scrutiny on this window? If we can’t find anyone willing to bridge the gap what are we meant to do?
Because we have a shortfall as we have a wage bill exceeding money in
The only way the club can maintain its existence in the league with these owners is to sell players and buy others at a much smaller outlay
Easier in lower leagues but clearly they Hope a player is deemed good enough to attract a large premier league fee
So if Gyokeres can keep scoring and improve on his conversion rate I would think there’s the plan
The issue with Gyokeres is if he has another successful season how much his value would be affected by him entering the last year of his contract next summer.
I've noticed the reported asking price for Brereton has dropped from £25m to £15m. Would be very interesting to see what he goes for.
Certainly might invoke some thought by those within the club as when to sell Gyokeres.
Well exactly-so why the particular scrutiny on this window? If we can’t find anyone willing to bridge the gap what are we meant to do?
Because we have a shortfall as we have a wage bill exceeding money in
And next summer a large chunk of that wage bill expires
But by then we are bust!
You don’t think we can hang on until then when the big 3 can all be sold at once and a whole wedge of expensive unwanted players let go?
Or perhaps to offer Gyo a contract extension on the basis that he has his choice of destinations in the summer. In his case though his value is pretty much proportional to goals scored.
You don’t think we can hang on until then when the big 3 can all be sold at once and a whole wedge of expensive unwanted players let go?
I’m not sure how much clearer I can be than to literally reword your quote for you.How am I wrong? So by your logic even if a club had met Boddy's valuation then O'Hare or any of the club's key assets for that matter would still be here then?
Make it make sense.
Well….clearly not and those 3 have declined in value and we have a wage bill until July 31 2023 at £20 million - also then what? That’s the Orange Ken approach as you’ve got declining disposable assets declining quality of players and relegation round the corner
Assuming there's the budget for it - albeit at the minute that's looking somewhat unlikely - but I'd imagine conversations regarding a new contract may have already begun, or if not they'll certainly be tabled in the first few months of the season.
The timing of Gyokeres' sale will obviously very much be determined from the outcome of those talks.
As previously stated I'd imagine there's a reason behind why the club whats a larger upfront fee rather than the fee being spread out in instalments.
Payment on transfer instalments owed and to mitigate cashflow issues will probably be two of the core reasons.
Why is that lazy. Do you honestly think Kompany no longer wants O’Hare ? I don’t … if they bring in more funds for Cornet, McNeil etc they will be back in for him I’m sure.
If we don’t sell Vik this summer then the prudent thing to do would be to offer him a better longer contract with an agreed transfer fee clause.
I don’t disagree. The question there really is can Seppalla find the finance in the case we can’t drum up a big enough fee.
Or if that's not possible then sell two at a cut price deal....
Well I’m sure if he’s sold for £5 million Mr Boddy will say it’s a good price
Unlikely the young players we’ve got in seem to have their heads screwed onAnd if he says no?
You say this as if £5m would be underselling him but have constantly said that “we clearly over value our players as noones bidding what we deem them worth”. Which is it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But then presumably not replace them and struggle to stay up. As I said, very tough balancing act.
My word the conjecture on here is insane. Let it all go folks. Close the thread. No one is leaving as yet.
Unlikely the young players we’ve got in seem to have their heads screwed on
Generally release clauses are set very high and only ever triggered if a player has a fantastic season and has multiple clubs after them. You wouldn't want to set too low a release clause as you could be doing yourself of 5-10 millionWe over value as we have release clauses far in excess of that
It's a huge balancing act, and in all fairness to Boddy I wouldn't want to be in his position. As the way I see it none of the options on the table are particularly positive if clubs don't meet his valuation on O'Hare.
Trying to understand this.
8 weeks of hysterics and speculation over one of the big 3 being sold.
Now hysterics by some over one of the big 3 NOT being sold?
Sometimes the club just can't win.
Unlikely the young players we’ve got in seem to have their heads screwed on
This is a football forum. Conjecture is it’s reason for being.My word the conjecture on here is insane. Let it all go folks. Close the thread. No one is leaving as yet.
Generally release clauses are set very high and only ever triggered if a player has a fantastic season and has multiple clubs after them. You wouldn't want to set too low a release clause as you could be doing yourself of 5-10 million
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Hmm I'm not sure I agree with that. I think they're very much a mixed bag. Look at Haaland's at Dortmund as a classic case in point.
For clubs of our stature they're usually agreed to convince in-demand players to stay in the short term, but under the guise that the club can't/won't out-price interested parties as and when they come in.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?