The reason of that being his contract situation, people are just lashing out. If he still had 3 years people would remain patient and supportive. Football fans are very fickle, nothing worse than thinking a player doesn't want to be at the club you support
Its the fact he’s fucking off the second he’s fit (or before). The decent thing would be a year extension and go for a reasonable fee in the summer after we’ve given him a chance to prove himself.
I think the fact we no longer play with a No 10 is a fair point to raise. People thought MvE couldn’t play any more cos we went to fullbacks!
Surely that is lacking fitness. At elite level fitness is the high intensity stuff like hard pressing.It is early days after such a long injury for O'Hare. But watching him v Plymouth I am not sure that he is lacking fitness?
Plenty of running constantly on the move, but he seemed stuck in second gear, lacking that sudden burst of energy to put the press on like he used to? Also there was one moment when Eccles or Sheaf was bringing the ball out in midfield with O'Hare to the side and slightly behind. O',Hate had a whole channel in front of him to attack, as the player on the ball drew the press. O,'Hare seemed aware of the opportunity but lacked the pace to get in front of the player carrying the ball.
When he gets on the ball he still has a trick or two and looks useful posing a creative threat. December into January will be an interesting time for him and us as a club?
It's a subtly different role home v away I think, almost seems ideal to rotate him and Allen in itWe played with a 10 against Stoke and started with one against Plymouth.
Seems to be quite adaptable depending on the the opposition and match situation.
He was awful in the first half an hour but one of the better players in the second half. He was consistently finding those pockets of space between the lines like he did pre injury.
Surely that is lacking fitness. At elite level fitness is the high intensity stuff like hard pressing.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Well, CoH is part of our present.The issue is he’s not playing better than Tats but started ahead of him. Tats is part of our future COH part of our history.
I have no issue with giving players minutes their current form doesn’t warrant if they are part of your future but if they are not it’s actually damaging your present.
That’s not my point.Well, CoH is part of our present.
I'd love it for him to be a part of the future too and get back to the level he's capable of. Whether that happens remains to be seen.
At the moment that's nothing but rumour, but no he isn't good enough to start right now. Though to be honest I wasn't expecting him back on the bench until New year.That’s not my point.
He doesn’t want to be part of our future and isn’t good enough currently to start in the present.
I fail to see how anybody can take the OP seriously ever again
Chin up lad it happensYou wanted to force people to take vaccines. People stopped taking you seriously a long time a go.
Get him back inWas in Samoan Joes last night....
Ohare will never be the same player he was before his injury as he will never have the pace he once had or quick feet. Whether he can adapt his game remains to be seen but one thing has struck me is Robins has not once said its like having a new player having him back which is what managers often say when long term injured players come back.
I would not be surprised to see him gone in January somewhere on loan with a mandatory fee as part of that deal.
Earlsdon does DallasYou wanted to force people to take vaccines. People stopped taking you seriously a long time a go.
Only seen game in a bar, Great body language from COH. For a player that is very talented but not a goal scorer , that was an exceptional performance, particularly in first half. Not sure where that leaves Ellis and Hadji. totally shown up by COH.
He’s goneOh I've missed singing that song! One of our remaining heroes. Sign the fucking deal, please.
Who was the bloke imitating him tonight then? He looked class.He’s gone
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?