One of the major differences i've noticed. (1 Viewer)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
He's better than both as a full back. Is that really questionable? I do like Haynes though i'll admit, before he completely lost his confidence that is. And Fleck would never of nicked the ball and set up that second goal last season, he has the quality to do that and for me, i'd like to see more of it!

Flecks had occasional moves forward before. It still was a very mixed bag. He was very average in the first half and his passing was as poor as ever. His work rate I think has always been pretty good and never seen less than 100% commitment. He is, ultimately though, a league one player.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
There certainly are, but I don't think that was really prevalent in this thread. It's the 'we're definitely losing, I'll come back and say I told you so after' kind of posts that reek the place out for me, but I wouldn't really class anything in this thread (yet) as being that kind of razorblades to wrists kind of bleating.

And yeah sorry, most of my post wasn't aimed at you at all so much as me going on a tangent within the same post.

Fair enough! :)
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
He's better than both as a full back. Is that really questionable? I do like Haynes though i'll admit, before he completely lost his confidence that is. And Fleck would never of nicked the ball and set up that second goal last season, he has the quality to do that and for me, i'd like to see more of it!

Yes he would have, and did get forward on a number of occasions last season. Mowbray will continue to use him mainly as a deep lying cm with Vincelot to protect the back 4.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top