Astute
Well-Known Member
Do you mean get rid of Labovitch and Fisher?
I reckon you're right. However, if we want to get back to the Ricoh then a bit of bridge building needs to be done and it'll probably be SISU that has to get the tools out.
Do you mean get rid of Labovitch and Fisher?
I am not sure that will help Astute..
We all know that Tim Fisher and Mark Labovitch are running this Club on behalf of Joy Seppala..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fair point.
On the other hand, most matches were that shite that half the crowd seemed to stay in the bar!
I am not sure that will help Astute..
We all know that Tim Fisher and Mark Labovitch are running this Club on behalf of Joy Seppala..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If a football team is not doing well the manager gets the sack, so if the football club isn't doing well why can't Fisher or Labovitch get the bullet?
Said it before, will say it again.
Personalising it don't always help. Am sure Fisher would happily fall on his sword as a negotiating tactic if needs be, but having a new face, and everyone saying how much better he/she is than the old one ain't so useful if behind it all is the same organisation pursuing the same philosophy.
See years of the new brooms of McGinnity and Robinson for example!
If only Robinson had bogged off with Richardson...
Said it before, will say it again.
Personalising it don't always help. Am sure Fisher would happily fall on his sword as a negotiating tactic if needs be, but having a new face, and everyone saying how much better he/she is than the old one ain't so useful if behind it all is the same organisation pursuing the same philosophy.
See years of the new brooms of McGinnity and Robinson for example!
If only Robinson had bogged off with Richardson...
So you would rather have McGinnity, Robinson and Richardson still here then?
Said it before, will say it again.
Personalising it don't always help. Am sure Fisher would happily fall on his sword as a negotiating tactic if needs be, but having a new face, and everyone saying how much better he/she is than the old one ain't so useful if behind it all is the same organisation pursuing the same philosophy.
See years of the new brooms of McGinnity and Robinson for example!
If only Robinson had bogged off with Richardson...
What if.....
Management buyout. Fisher gets new investors and buys out JS for a couple of million.... Main problem is not TF - he agreed HOT only to be overriden by Joy. Joy doesn't negotiate - Tim might.
Tim blames everything on Joy - e.g. "Joy is bonkers" - then brings CCFC back to the Ricoh in the spirit of "healing and reconciliation". Rehabilitated at a stroke.
That gets rid of Joy and following that, ML ( cannot seewhat ML does, apart from making annoying snide comments and wearing different hats when it suits ).
I'd have rather it be recognised they were all responsible for the chronic mismanagement, and the only way past that was for them all to front up to that.
Of course that never happens. Far easier to have a new broom that's not a new broom and blame the past on individuals - SISU do that, incidentally, with the sadly departed Mr. Igwe...
I'd have rather it be recognised they were all responsible for the chronic mismanagement, and the only way past that was for them all to front up to that.
Of course that never happens. Far easier to have a new broom that's not a new broom and blame the past on individuals - SISU do that, incidentally, with the sadly departed Mr. Igwe...
I see Joy's hard ball tactics as a bigger problem than Fischerisms
I agree that Fisher is the best of a bad bunch. Had the 400,000 interim deal as per HOT ( agreed by Tim ) gone through, we may be still in negotiations whilst playing in Cov. If Joy had not tried to force down the Higgs' price and the YB loan buy-out down to the ridiculous, Tim's road map may have had a chance. Had Joy not said unencumbered freehold on my terms, or else. CCC may have not have been so hostile.
I see Joy's hard ball tactics as a bigger problem than Fischerisms ( e.g. 3 weeks, 3000 regulars at Sixfields, 7000 if city doing well ).
She is using the tactics for dealing with medium sized businesses in trouble, instead of appreciating the emotions connected with a football club and the resources of a 300,000 population city - as well as the duties the council has to it's citizens.
She has seriously miscalculated and should cut her losses and go.
If a football team is not doing well the manager gets the sack, so if the football club isn't doing well why can't Fisher or Labovitch get the bullet?
It's completely different, The Manager for instance picks the players, requests new players to be brought in, creates the tactics, chooses the style of play, etc.
All Tim Fisher is doing is acting under Joy Seppala's instruction, as Astute said, if we wanted a fall guy you could get rid of Fisher, but that doesn't solve the issue.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fishers done an outstanding job.
Managed to not answer any difficult questions for 18 months.
Split the fan base in two.
Weakened the only proper fan representation.
What more could you ask for?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?