Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
It would have been interesting if everyone had gone over
It would have been interesting if everyone had gone overI know rules are rules but to deny a player a semi final because they had overriding emotion to a match winning 100 minute goal is a shambles of the game, of which football is all about.
I know rules are rules but to deny a player a semi final because they had overriding emotion to a match winning 100 minute goal is a shambles of the game, of which football is all about.
It happens. Often see managers encroaching the pitch after a goal too. Rarely a booking.It would have been interesting if everyone had gone over
What’s the thinking in booking players for removing their shirt?
I assumed it was something like that but then players are walking round with their tops off after the game with no punishment.Who is it offensive to?
I suppose if he scores goal 5 out of 5 then perhapsCan you imagine the shit on here if Diallo scores the winning goal for united in the semi final
Can you imagine the shit on here if Diallo scores the winning goal for united in the semi final
stay_up_skyblues V the machine update.
I had a go at challenging Bet365’s decision not to pay out. They’ve come back and said that they voided because Palmer was booked after the final whistle. He wasn’t, he was booked during the celebrations for the goal, not the win. I’ve put that to them and will see what comes back. No doubt this is all in vain but worth a squirt.
What’s the thinking in booking players for removing their shirt?
Can we not appeal the yellow card to become a red card so that he can have the same advantage as Diallo. We see managers who encroach onto the pitch being sent off and sent to the standsNot really as the rules are clear
Can we not appeal the yellow card to become a red card so that he can have the same advantage as Diallo. We see managers who encroach onto the pitch being sent off and sent to the stands
But not the semi final!It’s not an advantage as he’d then miss a league game
But not the semi final!
And so did ours after Wright's goal. Bit different to running across the entire width of the pitch for a knee slide.All the Wolves bench and subs were on the pitch after they went 2-1 up, there's a YT vlog by a Wolves fan in the new stand behind the goal and you can see them all on there
Well yes you do have a pointAnd so did ours after Wright's goal. Bit different to running across the entire width of the pitch for a knee slide.
And so did ours after Wright's goal. Bit different to running across the entire width of the pitch for a knee slide.
It was running full pelt across the pitch that got him in trouble but that’s truepics of the Manure game show their subs on the pitch after the Diallo goal - no cards just wrong
If that’s the case it means rather than it being a binary ‘must be given a card or the ref gets in trouble’ there’s an element of discretion the ref can applyIt was running full pelt across the pitch that got him in trouble but that’s true
Yep agreedIf that’s the case it means rather than it being a binary ‘must be given a card or the ref gets in trouble’ there’s an element of discretion the ref can apply
the laws don't say "running across the pitch" is a yellow card but "going on the pitch but not running" isn't, it's nonsense.It was running full pelt across the pitch that got him in trouble but that’s true
Be disappointed if the club are not looking into historical examples where the rules have not been applied. It does not need a circus just a pointed letter of concern.the laws don't say "running across the pitch" is a yellow card but "going on the pitch but not running" isn't, it's nonsense.
The ref by rights should book everyone or no one. There were other city subs on the pitch.
The problem is the section of the rules you’ve shown doesn’t say running the length of the pitch is a lot different, it just says you can’t enter the pitch. It doesn’t seem like it’s something that should be down to discretion.Lots of people really missing the point here! Palmer sprinted over from one side of the pitch to the other-he got carried away (like we all would have understandably) and it’s alot different from bench personnel/subs etc celebrating on the same side of the pitch,ie by running down the line to celebrate with the team(on the same side of the pitch).
Referee isn’t a fan like most of us with our Sky Blue tinted glasses on and must apply this sanction-it’s mandatory……..
A player who leaves the field of play to correct or change equipment must:
• have the equipment checked by a match official before being allowed to re-enter
• only re-enter with the referee’s permission (which may be given during play)
A player who enters without permission must be cautioned, and if play is stopped to issue the caution, an indirect free kick is awarded from the position of the ball when play was stopped, unless there was interference, in which case a direct free kick (or penalty kick) is awarded from the position of the interference.
He clearly wasn't thinking it through, but who would in that situation? I am sure so many would have done the exact same thing. Caught up in the moment. And what a moment it was.
Absolutely! But people think that discretion can be applied by the Referee, unfortunately it can’t and is in black and white.He clearly wasn't thinking it through, but who would in that situation? I am sure so many would have done the exact same thing. Caught up in the moment. And what a moment it was.
Yeah no common sense, the referees are just robots.
It's ok to nearly take someone's eye out, but you can't celebrate a winning goal.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?