Pearson signs (2 Viewers)

Forums New posts
jackdg

jackdg

Well-Known Member
Non contract terms

Can't be arsed linking to twitter
 
Nick

Nick

Administrator
Would think he would be on the bench as backup rather than starting 11 wouldn't he anyway?
 
Skyblueweeman

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
A bit miffed with the non-contract bit. Leaves him open to walk away at any point. Surely a month by month contract would be better?
 
G

gspotgaz

Well-Known Member
Another word for pay as you play? Seems sensible given his injury record. If he impresses and plays we will most likely look at getting him on a contract
 
steve82

steve82

Well-Known Member
I'm sure we've a agreement in place that has a 2 year deal activated once he triggers so many appearances or proves his fitness... etc.

I doubt MR would be wasting time on him otherwise if he's gonna walk away
 
Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
Just to flip it around, before someone else beats me to it:

We're top of the league after 10 games. Pearson has been integral to our defence and we have shipped less than a goal a game. In come Fleetwood during November and offer him a bit more money than what we are paying. Pearson leaves. Our defence falls apart.

We're relegated. The end.

SISU OUT!!!
 
steve82

steve82

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
Just to flip it around, before someone else beats me to it:

We're top of the league after 10 games. Pearson has been integral to our defence and we have shipped less than a goal a game. In come Fleetwood during November and offer him a bit more money than what we are paying. Pearson leaves. Our defence falls apart.

We're relegated. The end.

SISU OUT!!!
Click to expand...

If he's played 10 consecutive games and been integral then I'm sure we'd of put the contract and a pen in front of him by that point.

I think the fact it's non contract terms have been accepted currently is the risk factor of him breaking down.
 
fernandopartridge

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
Just to flip it around, before someone else beats me to it:

We're top of the league after 10 games. Pearson has been integral to our defence and we have shipped less than a goal a game. In come Fleetwood during November and offer him a bit more money than what we are paying. Pearson leaves. Our defence falls apart.

We're relegated. The end.

SISU OUT!!!
Click to expand...

Or, we're bottom of the league after 10 games. Pearson played in 5 of them, 5 consecutive defeats. He's now injured for the rest of the season....
 
Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
steve82 said:
If he's played 10 consecutive games and been integral then I'm sure we'd of put the contract and a pen in front of him by that point.

I think the fact it's non contract terms have been accepted currently is the risk factor of him breaking down.
Click to expand...

images
 
Astute

Astute

Well-Known Member
I'm happy for him to be with us not under contract. We can let him go. He can go when he likes. It is a way of him getting back into football.

But I can already see it. He plays well. He gets offered a contract elsewhere. He leaves. Supporters go into meltdown because one of 'our' players walks away.
 
C

Chipfat

Well-Known Member
MR could be waiting on his fitness and for others to leave before he commits money to a player with injury and disciplinary history, he is running on a tight budget so this deal makes sense to me. If you want to be negative it leave's us open for others to come in if he proves himself, but MR gets paid to make these decision's regarding the budget and players and will be judged by his squads and results.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top