Maybe you should ask your boss if the Niemoller quote is appropriate, then scoot on back to your 2 up 2 down £1m pad in Walthamstow for a quick single malt.
The net's closing, Pete.
Would you like to explain?
I am looking forward to the JR hearing. So who will end up in the court room? Timothy has always seemed to slip up. Lobotomy (can't remember his real name) gets flustered at the first proper question.
And then we have Joy. And most of us know what happened the last time she tried something similar. And if you are forgetting Lemon I will just remind you what the judge said
[h=5]
"Ms Seppala was the least satisfactory of all the witnesses. In making my general comments above, I said that no-one was deliberately lying. But I fear Ms Seppala has a distorted recollection of some events – particularly about what happened at the meetings in New York in January 2005 – and, with the benefit of hindsight, has introduced a "spin" (I am sorry not to be able to find a better word) which suits the Applicants' case. She is also prone to exaggerate – the Respondents would characterise it as lying, but I give her the benefit of the doubt on that – for instance her suggestion (eventually withdrawn by her) that Mr Wallace had "continually" represented to the Applicants that the RCF Banks had a strong direct claim against TXU Corp when in fact he never said that at all. She also recollects (and she may well have believed what she was saying) events which did not, as I conclude, take place (namely a conversation with Mr Wallace "in a small room" and Mr Olin reading and explaining a position paper in New York on 11 January 2005). She is, I am quite sure, an astute and effective business woman. I totally reject her description of herself as naïve. I am quite sure that she was closely involved in developments as the representative of SISU as a Committee Creditor. But she had many other business matters on her mind and when it came to producing her witness statement and giving her oral evidence, her recollection was not, I think, as accurate as she would like to make out"[/h]
So yes the net is closing. It is closing in on the truth. And we all know that it is one thing that SISU are not very good at. Or are we going to find out about this new ground in the next week.....you know......the one we were going to find out about a few months ago......the same one that is going to be on the border of Coventry and two local councils are in advanced talks.......FOI act is cool
And this time they are not after persecuting just one or two persons. They are taking on CCC and a charity. The first hasn't been scared into submission and has still tried to have talks after everything that has gone on. The second is a charity, and by law can't give in to SISU's threats.
The last time Timothy spoke was the closest to the truth he has come out with IMHO....when he said that the purpose of the JR was for the truth to come out and that was the only reason as they wouldn't be after damages. This was just after the rent free offer for this season and 100k for the next two that SISU tried to make out that hadn't been offered. Timothy was soon replaced by another mouthpiece. And not a very good one either. Forced out of the Ricoh? This part had to be dropped by Joy as the FL well know about it. And she wouldn't lie in court......would she?
So yes the net is closing. It is about time the truth was out. We don't know everything that has gone on. But we soon will. Could be very interesting.