Its convenient to ignore how good he is when so many had written him off. The forum wasn't as bad as the Facebook group for that obviously, but there are still a good few with egg of their faces.
I really like him and Hamer in the middle. Anyone who thinks Kelly should be in over Sheaf just sees what they want to see rather than watching whats in front of them.
Great for Sheaf but also good to see Hamer and Allen in there. Kelly?
Probably not played the >600 minutes yet?
Its almost as if players with potential can improve given a prolonged run in the team.
On the same note it would be nice if Walker (who has been good when starting/getting a run) could be afforded some time rather than being written off every time he comes on for 15-20 minutes and doesn’t notch.
Also applies to a front two of Godden and Walker. If it were to be a genuine tactic, it really needs 5/6 games in a row before you can honestly say it doesn’t work.
The demand from the vocal few for “instant success”
If we revert to two forwards they can't be Godden and Walker. Both good strikers but neither hold the ball up well enough so we keep losing possession. Gyokeres has to stay on with one of them. Or Waghorn.
No they called us worse than average
Its almost as if players with potential can improve given a prolonged run in the team.
On the same note it would be nice if Walker (who has been good when starting/getting a run) could be afforded some time rather than being written off every time he comes on for 15-20 minutes and doesn’t notch.
Also applies to a front two of Godden and Walker. If it were to be a genuine tactic, it really needs 5/6 games in a row before you can honestly say it doesn’t work.
The demand from the vocal few for “instant success”
Yeah I’m guilty of that with Tyler Walker. I do appreciate it. It’s not the norm for a super sub to have an impact
Agree stay with plan to the end also they are on a dodgy run themselves.
