CIMF, (with the greatest respect) - that's a puzzle then to me. You want the club back at the Ricoh and sound disillusioned with how things are - yet you go to Sixfields and endorse what Sisu are doing?
Your choice, but a strange one.
Can't you see what Sisu are doing?
See the bigger picture.
CIMF, (with the greatest respect) - that's a puzzle then to me. You want the club back at the Ricoh and sound disillusioned with how things are - yet you go to Sixfields and endorse what Sisu are doing?
Your choice, but a strange one.
Can't you see what Sisu are doing?
See the bigger picture.
It's like suggesting we had 10,000 woman beaters roaring us on.
The bigger picture could always, after all, see fault in more places than SISU, and could always see the club as more than SISU... the bigger picture could see those who go to Sixfields end up as the heroes and saviours.
The bigger picture would stop wasting time on small-minded and petty things like picking people up on their leisure choices, and instead refashion the debate so that those leisure choices didn't actually matter. There are plenty of other avenues to take, after all...
Repeat ad infinitum
Somebody going to Sixfields but disillusioned with the situation is, dare I say it, the default position. Portraying a bunch of happy clappy Fisherphiles is frankly insulting, as insulting as it would be to suggest we have a bunch of fickle fans incapable of thinking for themselves, who brought this on themselves by welcoming SISU into the club and who are now overcompensating, turning this on others to assuage their own guilt.
Original or not Grendel, it is what that fan believes.
I personally understand why lots of posters hold the views they do regardless of their camp...they have explained why.
But at times the debate sinks into cheap shots between the divisions.
There comes a point when all our long standing views can be cast off sarcastically as 'original'....even your post of "original"...being a fan of irony!