Port Vale (Away) Match Thread (2 Viewers)

Nick · Feb 5, 2016

Match thread for Port Vale (Away). Discuss Predictions, Tactics and the game!<div style="float:right; text-align:center;"><h2>Port Vale (Away) </h2>

Vale Park
2PM Kick Off

</div>

italiahorse · Feb 5, 2016

Difficult to predict with all the changes expected.
Probably spend the first half trying to recognise the new players.

Want this to be the change in fortune so will go for a positive 3-1 win for us.

covcity4life · Feb 5, 2016

3-1 also. league on tour begins again sunday!

ClarkeZ · Feb 5, 2016

Nervy 2-1 win.

I want him to change the shape a bit but I know he wont. Not the team I would choose but I reckon most likely:

----------------RCC

Lorentzon Cargill Ricketts Stokes

---------Stephens Fleck

Rose--------Maddison--------JOB

-------------Armstrong

Subs: Burge, Haynes, Murphy, Tudgay, Henderson, Lameiras, Cole

covcity4life · Feb 5, 2016

i doubt rose will play wing

Hcut PUSB · Feb 5, 2016

Naa as Mr Bassett said 4-4-2 its the only way to play.

Its Vale away what could go wrong.

C yawl in the Terrace

tom88 · Feb 5, 2016

win Sunday

----------------RCC

Lorentzon Stephens Ricketts Stokes

---------Rose Fleck

Murphy--------Maddison--------JOB

-------------Armstrong

Subs: Burge, Haynes, Hunt, Cargill, Henderson, Lameiras, Cole

Covstu · Feb 5, 2016

Very physical game ahead, our quick players will get kicked and they will stick two men on Armo. Wont be one for the purists... 0-0

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 · Feb 5, 2016

Murphy shouldn't play. He needs to earn his place back. Give other players a chance who could make a difference and are prepared to work harder for it.

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 · Feb 5, 2016

But he

Lorentzon Ricketts Stephens Stokes

---------Fleck

Lamerias-----Maddison--------JOB

-------Armstrong - Henderson

Maybe throw Rose in there too at some point.

Captain Dart · Feb 5, 2016

He will almost certainly play both Ramage & Hunt.

Nantwich Skyblues · Feb 5, 2016

He wont start Henderson ,he has hardly figured for scunny and by all accounts is carrying plenty of lard!...impact sub i would think

skyblue14 · Feb 5, 2016

blackburn_skyblue said:
He wont start Henderson ,he has hardly figured for scunny and by all accounts is carrying plenty of lard!...impact sub i would think

And surely he won't be stuck out wide like MAF is when he comes on. Straight down the middle!

malkitccfc · Feb 5, 2016

We'll miss Vincelot. Thought they looked decent at our place on Boxing day, but it was one of the few games we've won recently. 2-0 defeat unfortunately

RoperCCFC96 · Feb 5, 2016

My preview of Sunday's away clash with @portvale is now available to read here...

https://mattyroper.wordpress.com/2016/02/05/port-vale-preview-skybet-league-one-2/

PUSB

You can check out my blog here - mattyroper.wordpress.com

Mcbean · Feb 5, 2016

Nobody said must win game yet so I think I better

oh and Mowbray out

oh and Sisu's fault

PUSB

Otis · Feb 5, 2016

Mcbean said:
Nobody said must win game yet so I think I better

oh and Mowbray out

oh and Sisu's fault

PUSB

We have lowered our expectations so much, I now have this down as a 'must get a shot on target, not get beaten 3-0 game.'

Baby steps and all that!

stupot07 · Feb 5, 2016

10- 0 win to city. Anything less than you're accused of being negative.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

Fergusons_Beard · Feb 5, 2016

Can anyone explain why the fook it's on a Sunday?

(Sorry if been posted a million times)

In went in off Ferguson's beard....

Mcbean · Feb 5, 2016

Otis said:
We have lowered our expectations so much, I now have this down as a 'must get a shot on target, not get beaten 3-0 game.'

Baby steps and all that!

I think that could be allowed as a variation to the usual record !

Otis · Feb 5, 2016

Fergusons_Beard said:
Can anyone explain why the fook it's on a Sunday?

(Sorry if been posted a million times)

In went in off Ferguson's beard....

Because Stoke are at home on Saturday.

Fergusons_Beard · Feb 5, 2016

Otis said:
Because Stoke are at home on Saturday.

Cheers Otis-thought that it might be that as not on TV.

Not that many stokies will go to Vale Park!!

In went in off Ferguson's beard....

hill83 · Feb 5, 2016

stupot07 said:
10- 0 win to city. Anything less than you're accused of being negative.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

You are so negative. You even assume you are going to make a grammatical error or spelling mistake before you actually do.

torchomatic · Feb 5, 2016

I can actually see us doing alright on Sunday.

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Gazolba · Feb 5, 2016

I was going to forecast a win or draw on Sunday but now I fear with all these new players coming in, we'll be a disorganized mess. We could potentially feature five new/newish players (Lorentzen, Rose, Cargill, Stephens and Henderson) so difficult to foresee how they will all meld together.

Macca · Feb 5, 2016

Ecstatic with a draw, expect a shitty ugly 1-0 defeat

Gazolba · Feb 5, 2016

Otis said:
We have lowered our expectations so much, I now have this down as a 'must get a shot on target, not get beaten 3-0 game.'

Baby steps and all that!

I see it as being a different 'must' for each player. E.g. Rcc - must not screw up again, Lorentzen - must learn English so I know what TM is saying, Cole - must try to last 90 minutes, Maddison - must get a new hairstyle, Murphy - must try to look more like I'm trying, Armstrong - must get a goal or at least a shot on target, MAF - must get on the pitch, Tudgay - must find a new club, TM hates me.

tskezz · Feb 5, 2016

0-0 for me if we stick to one up top again.

Johhny Blue · Feb 5, 2016

italiahorse said:
Difficult to predict with all the changes expected.
Probably spend the first half trying to recognise the new players.

Want this to be the change in fortune so will go for a positive 3-1 win for us.

No pun intended?

stupot07 · Feb 6, 2016

hill83 said:
You are so negative. You even assume you are going to make a grammatical error or spelling mistake before you actually do.

To be fair, my assumptions are usually right when it comes to making grammatical errors or spellings mistakes- I'd even made one in the post you'd quoted and replied to.....Luckily the grammar police haven't been seen on here for a while.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

phildownunder · Feb 6, 2016

As long as the first part of the result is Port Vale 0, I`ll be happy.

letsallsingtogether · Feb 6, 2016

Hopefully a win with all the other results going our way.

I_Saw_Shaw_Score · Feb 6, 2016

4-2 Cov

Armstrong x2, Fleck & Henderson.

No dramas.

brez · Feb 6, 2016

Could well be called off. Couple of games off allready today and the forecast isn't to good, not a great pitch at vale.

hill83 · Feb 6, 2016

We play tomorrow. The weather looks like calming down a bit by then.

Port Vale (Away) Match Thread (2 Viewers)

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency