If a new stadium on that site were being considered.....
Still be swapping one rented ground for another rented ground though wouldn't it. I cannot see CCFC ever owning a share of the site can you?
Not going to be ready any time soon either, so doesn't solve immediate problems
Also if BCFC were there then CCFC would no doubt be the 2nd not primary tenant. As such incomes & costs would be split on the basis of who generated what much like the Liberty stadium. It might be a bigger better site but unless CCFC can provide success on the pitch and increase crowds is it a better option?
CCFC would be expected to commit to a long term agreement. Given how far we have fallen down the football pyramid then CCFC has become less attractive under the present owners and potentially bigger risks for the landlords.
I would think that any incentives from Birmingham Council would be aimed at BCFC particularly given the BCFC links to money men in far east (I don't mean Carson Yeung). BCFC also have a city centre site to sell and contribute ..... CCFC?
Being a prestige site then I would expect that the rent would be significant at the NEC. Could easily be more than a commercial rent at the Ricoh.
Undoubtedly some fans would be put off by being so far outside the City boundary.
Whilst in L2 or even L1 such a move doesn't seem to make much sense in terms of incomes, cost, convenience etc. I think it would actually create a financial burden.
Also how is 8000 fans rattling around in a 40000+ seater stadium better than 8000 fans in a 32000 seater stadium
If in Championship or above then it could work but surely with such success CCFC would be able to get a better deal at the Ricoh or build their own with or without BPA
I do not believe it to be a good solution or that it will happen
Birmingham City FC accounts make interesting reading ...... not the figures but the details.
BIRMINGHAM CITY FOOTBALL CLUB PLC - Filing history (free information from Companies House)