So how the fook have Ladbrokes got us as 3rd favourites for the league????
Easy give us cheap odds with no chance but if somehow we're up there amongst it then it suits the bookies nice and cheaply, instead of realistically putting us 25/1 and miraculously we somehow become contenders.
So why don't they quote every team under 16/1 say....surely odds are ALSO based on their assessment and probability???
One post-er on here (Gaz) argued that the fact that the bookies had us as one of the teams likely to struggle last season, and therefore, this proved that AT was up against it...yes, I'll go with that.
However, according to that theory, and the saying the bookies rarely get it wrong, surely we should expect AT to get us to challenge, when compared to relatively merits/strengths of the like of Hartlepool, Bury, Yoevil, Walsall etc...regardless of off-field issues????
Or do we just ignore the bookies as knowing fook all? (Despite their wealth through predicting such matters).
We will not have a poor season because of the quality of our squad. We could have a bad season because of the quantity though. Most teams have smaller squads in Div3 so it won:t be as bad as last season
You say that but last season we used 31 players and that includes Henderson and Roberts vs Southampton on the last day of the season -Only 13 teams used more players than us in the championship and only Doncaster used mora than 40.
In league one 16 teams used more players than we did and 5 teams had 40 or more players so they obviously had decent squads and/or the finances to bring in loans.
"Only 13"? So...most of them, then?
Well it's a majority, so technically, most is good-and really the "only" prefix was the unmerited spin that I was intending to highlight.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?