Premier League thread (8 Viewers)

[Wyken Sky Blue]

Everton and Nottingham Forest expect to be told on Monday that they have breached the rules.

Everton and Nottingham Forest are braced for charges TODAY

TOM COLLOMOSSE AND LEWIS STEELE: Everton and Nottingham Forest are expecting to be informed that they have been charged with breaking Premier League spending rules on Monday.

www.dailymail.co.uk

And yet Man City with a pending 115x charges are still getting away with things...

And Chelsea too!

Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk

 

---

[SlowerThanPlatt]

Did Forest not stop to think after their 25th foreign import?

Owner is mental.

 

[Sick Boy]

After all this, I don't see how they can't harshly punish Man City without the whole thing looking like a huge farce.

 

[Deleted member 9744]

After all this, I don't see how they can't harshly punish Man City without the whole thing looking like a huge farce.

And Chelsea?

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

Until I see otherwise, FFP exists to maintain the status quo.

 

[Sick Boy]

And Chelsea?

Forgot to mention them!

 

[Robinshio]

Everton and Forest face MINIMUM six-point deduction after 'FFP breach charges'

EVERTON and Nottingham Forest face minimum six-point deductions this season after being accused of breaching Premier League financial rules. After weeks of speculation, League chiefs confirmed the …

www.thesun.co.uk

 

[Robinshio]

May make championship very tough next season

 

[David O'Day]

And yet Man City with a pending 115x charges are still getting away with things...

And Chelsea too!

Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk

they haven't got away with anything? it's still being investigated

 

[Robinshio]

they haven't got away with anything? it's still being investigated

but if this brings everton to -16 in total, Man city must be looking at relegation -

 

[Flying Fokker]

Those final-day fixtures? Luton v Nottingham Forest and Sheffield United v Everton.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67983930

 

[Flying Fokker]

Sheffield United have scored only 15 goals so far. It’s a step up for Hamer. He must be looking at our atmosphere at the moment and relishing the day he gets a chance to enjoy himself.

 

[wingy]

Take away parachute payments from anyone who gets deducted?

 

[David O'Day]

but if this brings everton to -16 in total, Man city must be looking at relegation -

if we don't go up this year at least they will give us a big allocation

 

[San Francisco]

but if this brings everton to -16 in total, Man city must be looking at relegation -

Straight to League 2.

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

Take away parachute payments from anyone who gets deducted?

Take away parachute payments full stop.

 

[JohnWH]

Straight to League 2.

Straight to the one-team Man City League Super Variety Hour

 

[Tommo1993]

Fanny.

 

[wingy]

MC trying to get 5mloan fee and £135 k a week paid in full for Phillips.🫣

 

[wingy]

Fanny.

Those arms thrown to the air just dramatising the pathetic looking for the foul by Trafford!

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

Are Everton in the shit they are in because they think they are a big club? They might be a big club support wise but success on the field is not something they have achieved in a long time.

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

Fanny.

All this falling on the floor to waste time has gone to far now and it has gone all the way down to kids football. They need to put a clock on these keepers when the ball his held by them the fourth official presses a button and it goes onto the stadium clock after six seconds a direct free kick on the edge of the box is given. I reckon within a couple of weeks it’s gone away.

 

[Nuskyblue]

Are Everton in the shit they are in because they think they are a big club? They might be a big club support wise but success on the field is not something they have achieved in a long time.

I think they're in the shit because their owner thought it was just a case of chucking money at the thing without any particular plan.

I think they've been under special measures due to their recent issues so god knows how they've fallen foul of the regs if that is the case.

I'm confused how forest are there, aren't these things done over 3 years (I'm assuming in the Prem)?

 

[ovduk78]

I think they're in the shit because their owner thought it was just a case of chucking money at the thing without any particular plan.

I think they've been under special measures due to their recent issues so god knows how they've fallen foul of the regs if that is the case.

I'm confused how forest are there, aren't these things done over 3 years (I'm assuming in the Prem)?

Forest over spent in the 1st year back up. If they had sold Johnson 2 months before they did they would be OK. Normally money spent on ground improvements/builds are excluded from whst was spent but the PL are refusing Everton's claim on money paid for new stadium as apparently it isn't obvious it was spent solely on the new stadium.

 

[Nuskyblue]

Forest over spent in the 1st year back up. If they had sold Johnson 2 months before they did they would be OK. Normally money spent on ground improvements/builds are excluded from whst was spent but the PL are refusing Everton's claim on money paid for new stadium as apparently it isn't obvious it was spent solely on the new stadium.

Fair enough, I thought they did it over a 3 year period was all
(Something like a club is able to loose £105M over 3 years without penalty (which is mental)).

What Forest did the first season up was mental and it sounds like Everton are accounting creativity...

 

[ovduk78]

Fair enough, I thought they did it over a 3 year period was all
(Something like a club is able to loose £105M over 3 years without penalty (which is mental)).

What Forest did the first season up was mental and it sounds like Everton are accounting creativity...

The way it works is that a club can be charged for the same year more than once as it can be in more than 1 3 year period and that is happening to Everton with this new charge. I'm not sure what the year is in question.

 

[wingy]

I think they're in the shit because their owner thought it was just a case of chucking money at the thing without any particular plan.

I think they've been under special measures due to their recent issues so god knows how they've fallen foul of the regs if that is the case.

I'm confused how forest are there, aren't these things done over 3 years (I'm assuming in the Prem)?

Just that one payment for the transfer to Spurs being just too late due the time dea done apparently.players preference for spurs holding up the deal while the had one agreed.

 

[wingy]

Anyway sanctions, what good are when you're trying to maintain the status quo of the premier league, businesses according to one influencer on sky,
What have the governing bodies got to do with it?

 

[Frostie]

All this falling on the floor to waste time has gone to far now and it has gone all the way down to kids football. They need to put a clock on these keepers when the ball his held by them the fourth official presses a button and it goes onto the stadium clock after six seconds a direct free kick on the edge of the box is given. I reckon within a couple of weeks it’s gone away.

The '6 second' Law is still in the Laws of the Game but referees are advised against enforcing it.

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

The '6 second' Law is still in the Laws of the Game but referees are advised against enforcing it.

I assumed it had gone, why do they not enforce it?

 

[speedie87]

Should we be worried at all that our new exec chap is coming from Forest?!

 

[Frostie]

I assumed it had gone, why do they not enforce it?

As above, still there but I know refs have been advised against enforcing it as it is felt that the punishment (a free kick inside the penalty area) is too severe.

In truth, 6 seconds really isn't very long, especially if there was a crowded penalty area after a set piece or similar & so advice is usually just to warn them. In my opinion, when it is clearly an act of timewasting though then fine, allow them 1 warning but then enforce when it is clear that they are massively exceeding it intentionally.

 

[SBT]

I know refs have been advised against enforcing it as it is felt that the punishment (a free kick inside the penalty area) is too severe.

I'm all for referees being allowed some flexibility, but straight up advising refs to ignore some laws because you personally disagree with the punishment is bizarre and clearly a sign of something going badly wrong higher up the chain of command.

 

[fernandopartridge]

MC trying to get 5mloan fee and £135 k a week paid in full for Phillips.🫣

Guess that's to help offset their consistent FFP breach

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk