I'm inclined to agree with the first part of this - if there were any truth to this, surely PWKH isn't going to confirm it on Page 4 of a thread on Sky Blues Talk? And no, I'm not saying he's lying, I'm merely pointing out that if this were true it would probably not be confirmed on here before a statement was issued to the press.
However, I'm still skeptical that there was any interview. I just find the concept of Haskell talking to anyone at this stage difficult to believe. Hope my skepticism is wrong, personally.
Can a reputable paper like the Sunday times make up an interview and publish it? If it never happened Preston could sue them?
Also as PWKH said on the radio he really can't talk about buyers or get ahead of themselves as the club is due in high court on tues and we need to await that outcome.
Peter also said there are 4 parties interested.
If the court rules in favour of Acls case on Tues then Sisu will be turfed out ASAP and hopefully buyers will be forthcoming.
Interesting times and hopefully a club will rise from the ashes once more and we can all talk footy again.
Let's see the SISU arselickers try and tell us that this is a bad idea!!!
Change the record mate
The same Sunday Times which published the bullshit about the 'Qatari Dream League' a couple of weeks ago.:facepalm:
We are a L1 team which ensures that the national press have no 'inside' knowledge...just repeating what they hear from the likes of the CET and CWR....there ends this story!
They want the club to control and have an interest in the development of the area because it will give the club extra income which they will need to finance operations at higher levels. It will also make the club have a better asset base which might be important in future.
Can a reputable paper like the Sunday times make up an interview and publish it? If it never happened Preston could sue them?
Also as PWKH said on the radio he really can't talk about buyers or get ahead of themselves as the club is due in high court on tues and we need to await that outcome.
Peter also said there are 4 parties interested.
If the court rules in favour of Acls case on Tues then Sisu will be turfed out ASAP and hopefully buyers will be forthcoming.
Interesting times and hopefully a club will rise from the ashes once more and we can all talk footy again.
So who interviewed him or did they make it up?
Err..so you think this is a bad idea??
Sorry PWKH. I think you maybe playing the story down. First time I have read Preston talk about Coventry like this to the press! You don't want too much detail out which I completely agree on. But someone has interviewed him and he seems interested.
"Coventry has a fantastic fan base - over 30,000 attended a Johnstone' Paint Trophy game this season - and I want to bring that support back into the club by inviting the supporters trust to take 20% of its shares. I also want to bring Joe Elliott back as Coventry's chairman. He's a man who bleeds Sky Blue and who is furious about what the current owners have done to his club."[/QUOTE]
WOW!!
I missed this. This sounds like a real statement of intent and could not be falsified by the press. I think if this man is in the wings with ACL then Mr K-H probably does know more than he is letting on but is wise not to say anything. I just hope someone making statements like this have the minerals to back up their claims. As said before with all the previous suitors w've had over the years it's foolish to build up my hopes but I just can't help myslef :facepalm:
Where this article differs from most is that in contains direct quotes from the man rather than using "according to sources...". Any paper in these times of media scrutiny and accountability would be reluctant to quote someone directly in this way I think.
Having said that I would've thought if there was any truth in there being a serious bid here then PKWH would've just not commented rather than issue an outright denial so I really don't think it's going to happen.
The option will lapse if admin is confirmed on Tuesday.For a start he can't buy the charity's share-only CCFC Ltd can do that, which means he would need to buy the club, and presumably its holding companies, as well. Bit of a non story in my view.
Why are you putting words in my mouth, I never said that, just bored of your constant barracking of people who have a different opinion to you
If these quotes are direct, why haven't they been picked up by the CET,CWR and SBT?
Surely the bloke would have made contact with someone connected with the fans/locality etc.? Maybe he has, but for a national newspaper to be taking the lead on this with the latest news just seems a little hard to believe.
Jeez, I hope it's true, but I just have this nagging doubt....if the CET or CWR had anything about them, they ring the ST and ask how they spoke to this geezer and contact him directly.
Lazy Sunday journalism. Never get any proper news on a Sunday.
I'm not putting words into your mouth mark, I am asking you a question. Do you think that this is a bad idea?
To me, it seems to be the best idea since someone worked out how to automatically separate loaves of bread into toast-able slices on an industrial scale, and then successfully market this idea.
I genuinely think that SISU's behaviour should offend and disgust all intelligent, rational, decent people - and I do not understand why some are defending them so passionately. No satisfactory explanation has thus far been put forward. No-one has even attempted to do so.
If these quotes are direct, why haven't they been picked up by the CET,CWR and SBT?
Surely the bloke would have made contact with someone connected with the fans/locality etc.? Maybe he has, but for a national newspaper to be taking the lead on this with the latest news just seems a little hard to believe.
Jeez, I hope it's true, but I just have this nagging doubt....if the CET or CWR had anything about them, they ring the ST and ask how they spoke to this geezer and contact him directly.
I'm afraid I agree with you on this one, BFF
BFF? I don't think we have even met before but yeah ok we can be BFFs
Mmm...it's like someone has read the forum and ticked everything off a fans' wishlist:
Elliot back? Check.
20% stake for SBT. Check
Free ice-cream for the kids? Check
I'm still confused though after PWKH said the bloke wasn't in the game. Sounds great, but we've had hopes like this before.
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/sport/football/Football_League/article1235092.ece
More to the story is there if you are a Sunday Times subscriber.
Please for the love of God can this be true.
"Coventry has a fantastic fan base - over 30,000 attended a Johnstone' Paint Trophy game this season - and I want to bring that support back into the club by inviting the supporters trust to take 20% of its shares. I also want to bring Joe Elliott back as Coventry's chairman. He's a man who bleeds Sky Blue and who is furious about what the current owners have done to his club."
I think Mark is trying to suggest that you read, consider & try to understand - even ask questions to try to understand more. Rather than resorting to what I guess is the equivalent of simply shouting-down others that have a different view.
fecking get in If he has we need to sell out the Ricoh to show him we believe in him and what can be achieved
Come on boys pusb
I'm not putting words into your mouth mark, I am asking you a question. Do you think that this is a bad idea?
To me, it seems to be the best idea since someone worked out how to automatically separate loaves of bread into toast-able slices on an industrial scale, and then successfully market this idea.
I genuinely think that SISU's behaviour should offend and disgust all intelligent, rational, decent people - and I do not understand why some are defending them so passionately. No satisfactory explanation has thus far been put forward. No-one has even attempted to do so.
I have asked those questions time and again, and never had a satisfactory response from anyone who sides with SISU. There's just a defeaning silence, followed by snide claims that I have a secret agenda of loving ACL and/or wanting the club to fold, both of which are untrue. I have lost count of the times I have asked people to explain their defence of SISU in terms other than glib comments along the lines of "there is no alternative" or "problems began with BR"...
I have tried this so often, and got nothing in response, that I can't be bothered now. I am so frustrated that a few people take the side of SISU, seemingly out of genuine loyalty, thus denying us all a united front against SISU
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?