fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
It isn't as the ECJ, it isn't a judicial process
It isn't as the ECJ, it isn't a judicial processIs it worth putting something about the council assisting in finding a new ground or are we happy they’re doing something now?
A call to landowners to help?
Feel we need a position in case the current silence continues. We can’t just wait around for the ECJ judgement, it could be years we are away.
I’d like wasps to say it is as they acting as if it is and possibly quite rightlyIt isn't as the ECJ, it isn't a judicial process
It isn't as the ECJ, it isn't a judicial process
Yep, I'm happy to put my name to it too.Lots of users ive not seen comment before. Heartening
Yep agreeWhat I would say is it might be better to make an awareness what the forum is and number of a time members rather than individual names.
individual names will be a low number. That then looks like it’s a small number of supporters represented on here and will definitely get picked up on. I had the issue with the polls I did when Neil snd co said it’s a small sample.
How many on average view the site in a month. It would be better I think to quote stats like that - a lot of people will never have heard of this site - and then do a poll asking who supports its content. Then it’s legitimate to say there are x thousand members and in a sample poll y% endorse the stance
Yep agree
What I would say is it might be better to make an awareness what the forum is and number of a time members rather than individual names.
individual names will be a low number. That then looks like it’s a small number of supporters represented on here and will definitely get picked up on. I had the issue with the polls I did when Neil snd co said it’s a small sample.
How many on average view the site in a month. It would be better I think to quote stats like that - a lot of people will never have heard of this site - and then do a poll asking who supports its content. Then it’s legitimate to say there are x thousand members and in a sample poll y% endorse the stance
Without wanting to dilute the actual letter i think that's a pretty key thing to call out. Maybe in whatever email or cover note is supporting it...as grendel said, there are X amount of active members on SBT, and a poll showed that Y% of people agreed with the sentiment in this letter. For comparison purposes the average trust meeting has Z amount of people.Did he mention how many people were at the meetings compared to the 2,700? I'd say around 1%.
Yep nick do you have any metrics on that?Without wanting to dilute the actual letter i think that's a pretty key thing to call out. Maybe in whatever email or cover note is supporting it...as grendel said, there are X amount of active members on SBT, and a poll showed that Y% of people agreed with the sentiment in this letter. For comparison purposes the average trust meeting has Z amount of people.
Yep nick do you have any metrics on that?
Yeah, I am sure most of us are more than happy for you to put your real name on there, Torch.I'm happy to put my real name on it too. I'm sure many would.
Yep nick do you have any metrics on that?
Ok I just wondered if you had anything? ThanksThe most accurate way is a poll as there are too many different options
Users who post every day
Users who posted this month
People who only read threads
People who arent signed up but read threads etc
More to the point, who's prepared to organise it? It was tried during Northampton, but the nomination was late and it wasn't an overly impressive campaign, so arguably did more harm than good in that it encouraged CCC that the support was for the status quo.So who wants to be a councillor?
More to the point, who's prepared to organise it? It was tried during Northampton, but the nomination was late and it wasn't an overly impressive campaign, so arguably did more harm than good in that it encouraged CCC that the support was for the status quo.
I agree that it'd be an excellent way to put pressure on a solution, but it does need organising properly. Have you just volunteered?
Yeah, I am sure most of us are more than happy for you to put your real name on there, Torch.
Never had you down as Irish, Torch.That's Mr T O'matic, obviously
I understand what you're saying Nick but I think the thing with just having a Poll is that if 100 people vote then it's only a tiny sample of the fan base. I'm not suggesting that the sample size be masked but it would add some more weight if we could give a number of active members (understand this is a tricky definition) that this sample poll is representative of.The most accurate way is a poll as there are too many different options
Users who post every day
Users who posted this month
People who only read threads
People who arent signed up but read threads etc
No way youll ever guess mine! - errr damn it!Who else is going to play “guess the real names of SBT posters”?
Count me in - great idea and we as fans have been the ignored for far too long.
I would caution against quoting the 7000+ members of this forum, as it could undermine the strength of the message from any poll, if less than half responded.
If we had a couple of thousand fans, of which over 75% supported the statement, that would send a strong message to all the stakeholders.
Count me in - great idea and we as fans have been the ignored for far too long.
I would caution against quoting the 7000+ members of this forum, as it could undermine the strength of the message from any poll, if less than half responded.
If we had a couple of thousand fans, of which over 75% supported the statement, that would send a strong message to all the stakeholders.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?