Would we have scored today if Tyler Walker wasn’t on the pitch?
Who knows? Going by that same thought process would Walker have scored two the other day if Max hadn't been on the pitch? He won the penalty and chased down the goal kick to get us in for the second. And without those two goals we don't win that match, so by that argument Biaomou won us that match cos Walker wouldn't have scored without him doing those things.
Consider this. If we'd been able to play two of Walker today instead of max and walker, would that've been better? Apart from the set up Walker did very little and won''t do because it's not his game. So if we play two of him the ball is going to pretty much constantly come back at us because Walker isn't going to chase, challenge or hold up the ball. Max does that so Walker doesn't have to. It's a complimentary relationship that works heavily in walker's favour.
Like I've said before it's the Rosario argument. Everyone complained about his goalscoring and stated how much better Mickey Quinn's was. Rosario got sold and Quinn pretty much stopped scoring. Why? Because the person doing all the donkey work allowing him to score goals wasn't there doing it anymore.
Now when Godden is fit I'd fully expect him to come in for Max and we play a front two of Walker and Godden, but Godden will have to do most of the work because Walker won't. If we ever go back to one up top Walker is not the man you want playing it.