Pretty much spot on but I’d give Waghorn 7 too.Wilson 7
Dabo 7
Rose 7
McFadzean 9
Panzo 8
Bidwell 7
Eccles 7
Hamer 9 motm
Allen 8
Palmer 7
Gyokeres 7
Waghorn 6
O'Hare 7
Just excellent from fadz 9.5
Gus one goal one assist much better performance (controlled aggression) 9.0
Eceles good game . system worked better when he and Gus swopped positions 8.5
Palmer is getting to grip with his career , looking strong and positive, as we improve he will , the sort of player who will grow as the team does 8.5.
Ben Wilson, your defenders are making life to easy for you. Just keep telling them what to do and pick up those silly shots . 8.0 steal the rest of your points off fadz and panz ( if you dare).
Reckon I was at a different match to most of these scores.Wilson 7
Dabo 7
Rose 7
McFadzean 9
Panzo 8
Bidwell 7
Eccles 7
Hamer 9 motm
Allen 8
Palmer 7
Gyokeres
Waghorn 6
O'Hare 7
If he plays like a proper midfielder every game, which he is more than capable of, surely even Robins can overlook the odd indiscretion from him... his through ball and goal were both pieces of class and the elf done well too...Fadz and Bidwell played incredibly well , obviously Hamer 2 moments of magic catch the eye as they won us the match ...
I agree, a lot of the scores are coloured by a good 20 minutes spell and a win. That being said I'm going to give a couple of 8s and 9s myself!Reckon I was at a different match to most of these scores.
Hamer and McFadzean were outstanding. How can you mark Hamer as a 7? Two pieces of Premier League quality for the goals and his overall play was consistently high. What more could you possibly expect from a defender than McFadzean did yesterday. Both were a 9 at least.I agree, a lot of the scores are coloured by a good 20 minutes spell and a win. That being said I'm going to give a couple of 8s and 9s myself!
Wilson 6 - Actually had next to nothing to do, but didn't also do much wrong. A couple of terrible clearance, and shanking one into touch with no pressure was quite the achievement. Playing long every time in the first half didn't help us either, whether that was by instruction or not.
Dabo 5 - stuck to his task defensively, but was no outlet, also some odd positioning a couple of times. Seems to have lost the confidence to even try his one trick of the stepover when going forward just atm.
Rose 7 - terrible, absolutely terrible distribution first half invited pressure. Did an excellent defensive job though, especially second half.
McFadzean 8 - continues to defy age, one top clearance hooked away, although it was his error that invited the pressure.
Panzo 7 - also shonky on the distribution, but did keep Stoke's crosses at bay. Finding it hard to mark Rose and Panzo as I thought they were poor in many respects and invited their own pressure that they had to mop up, but you can't argue with a clean sheet.
Bidwell 6 - he's been an outlet this season but wasn't today. Defensively solid. Both full backs however let Stoke get a lot of crosses in and invited pressure, be it tactically from Robins or their own decisions.
Eccles 5 - thought he was poor today, and unlike some of the others didn't improve in the second half. He does seem to struggle with confidence at times, so hopefully a run of games will make him believe he has a right to be there.
Hamer 7 - poor first half, came alive second half. Bonus point for goal but, although a couple of pieces of magic show why he has to play, the first half showed why he plays for us just atm and not a better team.
Allen 9 - I just don't get why he's everybody's boo boy on here. First half he was the best player for us, and the only midfielder making runs (Palmer did have played him in first half), along with one sublime pass and some quick feet. Second half great run for the goal. Normally he's better deeper, but today it was the other way around and he shrank back when moved deeper. Game was dead then though. Bonus point for the goal.
Palmer 7.5 - he has class and a good touch. Too distant from the holding midfielders first half, but what is a pleasant surprise is how hard he works to chase down and harry. He's no O'Hare in that respect, but he's not the luxury casual stroller we were led to expect.
Gyokeres 5 - hard to mark really as it was a thankless task he was given. Didn't hold the ball on the few occasions it came to him first half, although Wilson punting everything long didn't help - Gyokeres may be strong, but the long ball doesn't suit him
Waghorn 6 - some nice touches, but I think a January move would suit him and us. Not sure where he gets game time when everybody is fit.
O'Hare 7. Nice shot, and looked on it from the start. Bonus point for being back
Robins 7. Has gone pragmatic, set us up for being hard to break down given where we are in the table. I think we've been lucky the past couple of games but, how often were we unlucky last season? Hopefully we can loosen the strings a bit soon.
Because he was utterly shit in the first half, and would have been a generous five at best.How can you mark Hamer as a 7?
Because he was utterly shit in the first half, and would have been a generous five at best.
Indeed. Better to have a choice over who's the best, rather than least worst!If it makes you feel better mate , I like Allen, and I'm sure the headache for Robins begins now with the players we have available
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?