rob9872
Well-Known Member
Really? I can only remember one before we were 3 down and we didn't create that, it was their error.
Really? I can only remember one before we were 3 down and we didn't create that, it was their error.We created chances and missed sitters.
Really? I can only remember one before we were 3 down and we didn't create that, it was their error.
Which 2 for Gyo and Godden didn't come on until 3-0. We were never in the game.Gyo missed 2 decent ones
Godden should have scored
Honestly don't see anything in Maatsen. Beyond wasteful at wing back. Looks a fish out of water in the attacking midfielder roles, particularly when he has his back to goal (which is understandable).
No we created chances and missed OHareWe created chances and missed sitters.
Which 2 for Gyo and Godden didn't come on until 3-0. We were never in the game.
What I said was we created no clear cut chances until we were 3 down and despite keep replying you've yet to tell me one created.So Godden shouldn't have scored?
Gyo had 2 great chances, didn't he?
Not sure I agree with this.I really want to like Maatsen but I can't.
Just a lightweight 'nothing special' player.
For anyone that moans about OHare see today. No threat without him.
Blame the manager for today too, set us up wrong called the changes needed at HT and he didn't make them. Even at 3down he didn't try anything different even in shape to try 4 at the back. Went 2 up top by removing a midfielder where we were already over run.
Fadz waving his arm around for the first instead of playing to the whistle didn't help and can't believe kane given motm 7 ratings here, personally thought he was abysmal today. For me only JCS came out with any credit. Nice finish by Hamer but most of his silly flicks gave away possession. Not going down, so need to sort something ahead of Tuesday and have a good go at Luton or season could quickly tail off with a whimper.
Not sure I agree with this.
When heads dropped, Maatsen was still busting a gut and trying things, trying to move the team forward. We can't forget he's playing out of position in attacking midfield.
I was one of those advocating probably too soon for Tavares, but 2-0 down at HT after last week's cameo and goal, it looked an ideal time to bring him on for 45.I agree we should have made changes, but those changes would really have been clutching at straws.
Our bench was so weak its untrue. Lack of investment has killed our season.
I was one of those advocating probably too soon for Tavares, but 2-0 down at HT after last week's cameo and goal, it looked an ideal time to bring him on for 45.
It's crazy you have a young lad full of confidence fully fit and you bring on a player who was ill over night and ill in the dressing room I'm sorry Mark Robins but that's fucking ridiculous decision to be making.To overlook him in favour of a player who is ill was baffling
Just read the full interview, he basically says waghorn isn't fit and his plan was to always get him on to get minutes into his legs. Which once again proves MR sets his subs up before hand and doesn't deviate. I'm sure waghorn really appreciated having to come on at 3-0 after being sick all night and still suffering for it as he was ill as soon as he got off the pitch. When has it ever been a good idea to play someone who's got a sickness bug? What if it's a bug that others pick up and on Tuesday there's 5 of them out with it.It's crazy you have a young lad full of confidence fully fit and you bring on a player who was ill over night and ill in the dressing room I'm sorry Mark Robins but that's fucking ridiculous decision to be making.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Ridiculous alright once it went to 3-0 down we were never going to get anything out of the game so changes should have been made with Tuesday in mind. Getting minutes into an ill strikers legs doesn't make sense if he wants to get him minutes into his legs put him in the 23s for a few games. Surely Tavares could of been blooded for half hour or so surely he's more of a chance of being a game changer than an ill strikers who is clearly not fit. Wake up robins stop being so one minded think outside of the box for a change. Why not give howley a run out and take off sheaf to rest him for Tuesday at 3 down alsoJust read the full interview, he basically says waghorn isn't fit and his plan was to always get him on to get minutes into his legs. Which once again proves MR sets his subs up before hand and doesn't deviate. I'm sure waghorn really appreciated having to come on at 3-0 after being sick all night and still suffering for it as he was ill as soon as he got off the pitch. When has it ever been a good idea to play someone who's got a sickness bug? What if it's a bug that others pick up and on Tuesday there's 5 of them out with it.
Forget the hype for Tavares and treat him as a 21 year old striker who just scored a worldie to get us a point in the 98th minute. To then be 3 down with 44 minutes to play and not bring him on at all is ridiculous. To not make 3 subs and take an opportunity to rest rest a key player with Tuesday in mind, again, is ridiculous.
For me subs has and man management as always been his flaw.
Exactly. What is the worst that could happen? Tavares has said everything right in his interviews since his debut, sounds really grounded but if I were him I'd be more than a little miffed if I've shared a hotel with waghorn who's been voming all night and then he comes on instead of meRidiculous alright once it went to 3-0 down we were never going to get anything out of the game so changes should have been made with Tuesday in mind. Getting minutes into an ill strikers legs doesn't make sense if he wants to get him minutes into his legs put him in the 23s for a few games. Surely Tavares could of been blooded for half hour or so surely he's more of a chance of being a game changer than an ill strikers who is clearly not fit. Wake up robins stop being so one minded think outside of the box for a change. Why not give howley a run out and take off sheaf to rest him for Tuesday at 3 down also
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Yes you would be thinking after the impact he made in the previous game and with waghorn being ill and Godden easing back in after abdominal surgery that you would surely be given a run out. Especially when chasing the game ud bring on a fully fit player surely over an ill one surely?Exactly. What is the worst that could happen? Tavares has said everything right in his interviews since his debut, sounds really grounded but if I were him I'd be more than a little miffed if I've shared a hotel with waghorn who's been voming all night and then he comes on instead of me
We had people moaning about Godden missing chances yesterday although he’s back ahead of scheduleYes you would be thinking after the impact he made in the previous game and with waghorn being ill and Godden easing back in after abdominal surgery that you would surely be given a run out. Especially when chasing the game ud bring on a fully fit player surely over an ill one surely?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
See Sterling or McCallum. Same old same old.I really want to like Maatsen but I can't.
Just a lightweight 'nothing special' player.
Exactly. What is the worst that could happen? Tavares has said everything right in his interviews since his debut, sounds really grounded but if I were him I'd be more than a little miffed if I've shared a hotel with waghorn who's been voming all night and then he comes on instead of me
See Sterling or McCallum. Same old same old.
Waghorn played well. If Tavares feels like he’s already entitled to be the first name on the team sheet after seven minutes and a goal then maybe he’s not so grounded after all.
No not yet. Many said the same about Sheaf-still time.This is why I think we signed Bidwell, he wanted a non loanee left back/left wing back with a bit of experience.
Not really worked out so far.
As much as I’m not a fan of waghorn , he didn’t play that badly when he came on yesterday , plus he got an assist so it’s not as if he didn’t contribute??
He got an assist after a dreadful attempt to have a shot.
His moment was the header, another in a long line of good chances he's thrown away.
He got an assist after a dreadful attempt to have a shot.
.
It wasn't a dreadful attempt, the ball bounced up so he sensibly got the ball under control rather than try to slash at a shot. The header wasn't a great chance either as I've posted previously.He got an assist after a dreadful attempt to have a shot.
His moment was the header, another in a long line of good chances he's thrown away.
He has to take his turnIt wasn't a dreadful attempt, the ball bounced up so he sensibly got the ball under control rather than try to slash at a shot. The header wasn't a great chance either as I've posted previously.
I think Waghorn has been disappointing but he's being scapegoated here now
It wasn't a dreadful attempt, the ball bounced up so he sensibly got the ball under control rather than try to slash at a shot. The header wasn't a great chance either as I've posted previously.
I think Waghorn has been disappointing but he's being scapegoated here now
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?