They’re generousWilson 6
Doyle 7
Fadz 5
Panzo 6
Dabo 6
Bidwell 6
Sheaf 8
Hamer 7
Allen 5
Godden 5
Gyokeres 7
They’re generous
You give Allen the same score as Sheaf and HamerWilson 6 kicking poor otherwise not too bad
Dabo 3 awful display yet again
McFadzean 5 gave 2nd goal away
Doyle 6 played better than Rose on the right
Panzo 6 improved the defence when he came on
Bidwell 6 steady
Sheaf 6 two brilliant passes but gave the ball away so often
Hamer 6 brilliant goal but other than that it was a 5 awful first half improved second.
Allen 6 ran round like a headless chicken again 2 goal chances
Gyokeres 8 mom really should have had at least 3 goals and that was in the first 15 minutes. Seemed to play them on his own.
Godden 6 didn’t really add anything to the team was surprised he made it to the end.
Moore needs to come back in and Fadz needs to sit on the bench.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
He was the only one in midfield that had any energyYou give Allen the same score as Sheaf and Hamercoz he ran around alot
He was the only one in midfield that had any energy
Wilson 6 (indecisive on occasions but not much he could do about the goals)
Dabo 5 (did improve second half but should have headed clear for first goal and touch was poor)
Rose 6 (felt for him with early injury. His opportunity to get regular starts and another injury)
McFadzean 4 (out-muscled in the air, some wasted long passes and lucky not to have conceded late penalty)
Doyle 5 (missed header leading to first goal and that was one of many. Did some decent work second half but looks very weak in the air)
Bidwell 6 (didn't provide much going forward but defensively okay)
Sheaf 7 (some wayward bits but also brilliant ball for Gyokeres goal and some important tackles)
Hamer 7 (always looking to create, has clearly worked on his discipline and wonderful goal)
Allen 6 (absent first half but much more involved second, taking up good positions enabling two decent shots on target)
Godden 7 (worked tirelessly, set Gyokeres away with early chance and won numerous aerial duals)
Gyokeres 7 motm (some brilliant work with the ball, causing them problems throughout but should have had 3 goals first half. Took his one well)
Panzo 6 (better in the air than Fadz and Doyle today and looked decent progressing forward)
Thought Tavares pace would have caused them problems if brought on last 15. Think we could have won it with fresh legs.
Not to do with ratings as such, but re: your point about Doyle - I'm sure that last season on the Sunderland forum (he was there on loan) someone posted some stats about the percentage of aerial challenges he won. It was scarily low. He is talented with the ball at his feet.
Agreed. I've been really impressed. Looked to be comfortable on the right as well which is goodView attachment 26202
He averaged around 53% of Aerial Duels Won last season & is at 55% in this.
Worth noting though that is a higher % of Aerial Duels than all of Rose, Panzo & even Hyam so far this season. Only Fadz has a better % but from far less Duels.
He also wins far more Ground Duels than all of the others.
I said prior to his signing that I was slightly concerned by his lack of physicality but actually he's done far better than expected.
I was terrified when Adebayo got down the side of him (and on his weaker side too) but he actually shrugged him off the ball with relative ease due to his reading & timing. He's far from perfect at just 18 but he's doing better than anticipated I think.
Must be my mind playing tricks,or it may have been one specific game. Not knocking the lad, as you can see he has ability, and I would always prefer a player who is comfortable on the ball to a hoofball merchant.View attachment 26202
He averaged around 53% of Aerial Duels Won last season & is at 55% in this.
Worth noting though that is a higher % of Aerial Duels than all of Rose, Panzo & even Hyam so far this season. Only Fadz has a better % but from far less Duels.
He also wins far more Ground Duels than all of the others.
I said prior to his signing that I was slightly concerned by his lack of physicality but actually he's done far better than expected.
I was terrified when Adebayo got down the side of him (and on his weaker side too) but he actually shrugged him off the ball with relative ease due to his reading & timing. He's far from perfect at just 18 but he's doing better than anticipated I think.
You can see Doyle has something about him. He's only 18 and he's come in and been pretty impressive. He's comfortable on the ball, made some great tackles as well.
His potential is huge, panzo the same. I think Doyle will go on to be a very good player
Not just your ratings but I am amazed by most of the scores for Allen and Godden both of whom did virtually nothing. I don't see how you can give Gyokeres the same score as Godden and Doyle and Bidwell are way too low.Wilson - 6: Looks so uncomfortable but couldn't have done much about the goal. Distribution is poor.
Dabo - 4: Could have been lower. First half was atrocious. Looked so much better in the second.
Doyle - 5: Some great defending at times but like the rest, struggled at times to handle their long ball.
Fadz - 4: Age starting to show.
Rose - 4: Didn't fancy it!
Bidwell - 6: Really starting to step up now. Still find him weak in the final third but he's willing to get stuck in, unlike most.
Sheaf - 7: Everywhere.
Hamer - 7: Still not at his best but certainly signs that he was more up for it. Still looks a little big around the waist.
Allen - 6: Love the energy and the effort but I can't help but think we need more quality if he's playing more forward. For a little lad, he threw himself about.
God - 6: Held the ball up better than I've ever seen but like with Allen, I also think he's a player lacking that additional quality on the ball.
Gyok - 6: Generally brilliant but knocked down a couple due to the missed chance. He has missed a hatful of those now.
Robins - Too stubborn. They were as bad as us in defence and the space in behind was huge. Tav/Walker would have been a great option later on. Also surprised he didn't put on Palmer for the extra physicality.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?