On a bright note, i had 20quid on Blackpool at 3/1. Chinese, 12 cans and a 1 night subscription to Babestation Xtra.
Hamer finds his space IMOTo be fair to Kane he does find space well. Not saying he’s great but finding space going forward is a good attribute of his.
I want to point you in the direction of all the Internet, or Internets, if you will.Fuck I miss babestation, we don’t have that over in Aus.
I like the race to shoot your load while the nipples are out before they put them away again
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hamer finds his space IMO
I want to point you in the direction of all the Internet, or Internets, if you will.
The motion standsNot the same man…. I like the race against time before she hides the tits
Plus there’s multiple channels and there’s always some elite bird. You can be on pornhub scrolling 20 pages and still haven’t found THE ONE lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Amazed at the good marks for Kane - he was completely off the pace today. Bizarre that we kept funnelling him the ball (just like we did last season).
I thought sheaf was poor today.
Caveated with at least half the team were confirmed as ill by MR and those that weren’t specifically named will surely be confirmed as so over the next few days.
Wilson - 4 - we know he’s over his head, but was especially obvious today. Distribution was poor, but to be fair, at times when the press was on, he literally had no option but to punt it.
Kane - 5 - surprised at the high marks for Kane. Raised his one dimensional ‘cross it from anywhere’ as a concern pre-game, and despite having no striker, that’s what he did. Positionally he was all over the place, looked hesitant on the ball and wasn’t an effective outlet.
Doyle - 5 - poor for the goal. But actually cant recall him being that bad individually otherwise. Still looked confident on the ball when on the front foot.
McFadzean - 6.5 - some great blocks across both halves. Disappointed he didn’t get closer to Madine.
Panzo - 5 - poor in the air and positionally, as exemplified by letting a near like for like ball for the goal on Tuesday through the channel between him and the CB.
Bidwell - 5 - we know he’s (very limited) offensively, but today was non-existent. Also thought he’s have a better plan to stop Yates.
Hamer - 7.5 - absolutely the right Hamer again today. Carried us first half and really stood up as a leader.
Sheaf - 6 - poor due to a number of sloppy passes, but never hid, still wanted the ball and still made a number of good offensive passes.
Allen - 6 - ran around a lot, but can’t remember him doing anything (perhaps harsh) other than the volly past the post.
COH - 7.5 - how he made it though 90 minutes is incredible. Not as involved or sharp as we’d like but that’s to be expected. Still glimpses of him and still a step above most.
Palmer - 7 - tough ask today, hes clearly not a back to goal player, especially today when he was continuously fouled by their CB.
Subs
CBA
When our footballers played well together, we scored.
As we try to play more expansive and possession based football, our WB’s attacking and positional ability will hold us back.
Yup.Agree with @Great_Expectations and @Brighton Sky Blue comments.
If illness is as has been reported, then credit to the players in general for the effort that they put in. I have seen a lot worse displays from a City team (when supposedly fit). Disappointed (and thought we'd be hammered after the first 15 minutes) but we stuck in the game well, and improved as an attacking threat in the second half.
Yup.
Thing is Harry, if this morning we had been told we would have to play with no striker and that pretty much half the team and nearly all the defence were going to have to play ill, we would have written the game off as a defeat anyway wouldn't we. We wouldn't have expected anything out of the game
Just a very unlucky day where sickness hit the club.
Robins said he really wanted to take O'Hare off, because he shouldn't have played the full 90 mins, but that he had no choice because of the situation.At least O'Hare got through a full 90 minutes intact. One plus along with a very good goal.
Robins said he really wanted to take O'Hare off, because he shouldn't have played the full 90 mins, but that he had no choice because of the situation.
Think we’re all forgetting the most important rating:
Robins: 1
get this fraud out of my club
Bidwell is too. He may be solid defensively but he's offered fuck all going forward since game 3. He just passes it back every time now.
Bidwell is too. He may be solid defensively but he's offered fuck all going forward since game 3. He just passes it back every time now.
What did Robins get wrong? Wrong in having to play players who were ill? Should he have picked Gyokeres, who was apparently too ill to start?worst performance so far but when you make Blackpool look like Man City and playing without a striker until vik comes on what do we expect.
whole team 4..
Robin's 3. got it completely wrong yesterday from the first whistle til the last.
Doyle a level to much for him
What did Robins get wrong? Wrong in having to play players who were ill? Should he have picked Gyokeres, who was apparently too ill to start?
Just wondering what else he could have done differently. We had at least 4 players out there that shouldn't have played, but had to. Walker was on the bench because he had only had one day's training and Eccles and Rose were missing through illness too.
So, what did he get wrong?
What did Robins get wrong? Wrong in having to play players who were ill? Should he have picked Gyokeres, who was apparently too ill to start?
Just wondering what else he could have done differently. We had at least 4 players out there that shouldn't have played, but had to. Walker was on the bench because he had only had one day's training and Eccles and Rose were missing through illness too.
So, what did he get wrong?
You can’t remember Doyle being that bad ? , I thought he was awful, didn’t win a thing in the air and is so one footed it defied belief.Caveated with at least half the team were confirmed as ill by MR and those that weren’t specifically named will surely be confirmed as so over the next few days.
Wilson - 4 - we know he’s over his head, but was especially obvious today. Distribution was poor, but to be fair, at times when the press was on, he literally had no option but to punt it.
Kane - 5 - surprised at the high marks for Kane. Raised his one dimensional ‘cross it from anywhere’ as a concern pre-game, and despite having no striker, that’s what he did. Positionally he was all over the place, looked hesitant on the ball and wasn’t an effective outlet.
Doyle - 5 - poor for the goal. But actually cant recall him being that bad individually otherwise. Still looked confident on the ball when on the front foot.
McFadzean - 6.5 - some great blocks across both halves. Disappointed he didn’t get closer to Madine.
Panzo - 5 - poor in the air and positionally, as exemplified by letting a near like for like ball for the goal on Tuesday through the channel between him and the CB.
Bidwell - 5 - we know he’s (very limited) offensively, but today was non-existent. Also thought he’s have a better plan to stop Yates.
Hamer - 7.5 - absolutely the right Hamer again today. Carried us first half and really stood up as a leader.
Sheaf - 6 - poor due to a number of sloppy passes, but never hid, still wanted the ball and still made a number of good offensive passes.
Allen - 6 - ran around a lot, but can’t remember him doing anything (perhaps harsh) other than the volly past the post.
COH - 7.5 - how he made it though 90 minutes is incredible. Not as involved or sharp as we’d like but that’s to be expected. Still glimpses of him and still a step above most.
Palmer - 7 - tough ask today, hes clearly not a back to goal player, especially today when he was continuously fouled by their CB.
Subs
CBA
When our footballers played well together, we scored.
As we try to play more expansive and possession based football, our WB’s attacking and positional ability will hold us back.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?